Loading track analysis
Loading track analysis
A spacious galloping circuit where stamina and quality shine through
Nottingham Greyhound Stadium at Colwick Park is one of the premier racing venues in the East Midlands and a major player on the national BAGS circuit. The stadium benefits from a large, purpose-built facility with excellent spectator amenities, modern kennelling, and a well-maintained racing surface. Nottingham regularly hosts high-profile events and attracts strong competition across all grades.
The track operates under Arena Racing Company management and broadcasts nationally, making it one of the most-watched venues outside London. Its Midlands location makes it accessible from a wide catchment area, and it draws runners and trainers from across the region. The meeting schedule is busy, with multiple fixtures per week featuring a full spectrum of graded racing.
Nottingham has earned a reputation as one of the fairest tracks in Britain — a venue where genuine quality is rewarded and freakish results are relatively rare. This makes it a favourite among form students and systematic bettors who appreciate tracks where careful analysis can produce consistent returns.
Schedule: Tuesday, Thursday, Friday & Saturday
| Races | Wins | Win% | Places | Place% | Win P&L | Place P&L | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All Time | 514 | 136 | 26% | 243 | 47% | £-58.86 | £-94.53 |
| Today | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | +£0.00 | +£0.00 |
1st pick performance · £1 level stakes at SP · Place = 1/4 odds top 2
Dogs dropping in grade today
Composite 30% · Rating 25% · Speed 15% · Bend 10% · Suit 20%
Win rate at Nottingham & their runners
Nottingham's circuit is one of the larger in UK greyhound racing, with a circumference of approximately 460 metres. The bends are wide and sweeping, with a generous radius that allows dogs to race cleanly through the turns without severe inside-rail bias. The run-up to the first bend is long enough to let all runners establish their position fairly, which is why trap draw has less influence here than at tighter tracks.
The home straight is one of the longest in UK racing, providing ample opportunity for closers to make up ground in the final stages. This physical characteristic is the primary reason that Nottingham produces fewer front-runner-dominated results than the national average — there is genuinely enough time and distance for stayers to close down leaders on the run to the line.
The surface at Colwick Park is well-drained and consistently maintained, with going conditions tending to stay in the normal range. The stadium sits in a relatively open location by the River Trent, which means it can be affected by weather — particularly heavy rain can shift the going more noticeably than at urban, sheltered venues. The inside rail provides a clean racing line but the wide bends mean that a dog racing two wide is not catastrophically penalised.
Nottingham is a true galloping track. Dogs need sustained speed, stamina, and the class to maintain their effort over wider, more demanding bends. Front-runners can and do win, but they need to be genuinely quick rather than simply relying on favourable draw — because the wide bends and long straight give rivals every opportunity to run them down.
Performance ratings are the strongest single predictor at Nottingham. Dogs with higher overall race quality — measured across pace, position, beaten distance, and sectional progression — consistently outperform dogs that may have faster raw speed but lack the stamina to sustain it. This is a track that rewards the complete greyhound rather than the one-dimensional speedster.
Class movement is particularly telling at Nottingham. Dogs dropping down in grade tend to win at a higher rate here than the national average, because the fair track allows them to express their superior ability without being undone by draw or interference. Conversely, dogs stepping up face a genuine test against established competitors who know how to use the track's wide bends to their advantage.
| Distance | Races | Avg Field | Avg Winner Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| 255m | 18 | 1.3 | 15.02s |
| 305m | 437 | 2 | 18.12s |
| 480m | 165 | 1.2 | 28.86s |
| 500m | 3903 | 1.3 | 30.49s |
| 680m | 51 | 1.4 | 41.82s |
| 730m | 15 | 0.7 | 44.28s |
| 905m | 2 | 3 | 56.73s |
The Nottingham sprint. Relatively short and decided more by early pace than at the standard trip, but the wide bends still prevent extreme inside bias. Sprint specialists can prosper but need clean breaks.
The standard Nottingham trip and the distance that best defines the track's galloping character. A genuine test of all-round ability where sustained speed, stamina, and class are rewarded. The long home straight makes this an exciting distance for spectators and a rewarding one for form analysts.
The Nottingham stayers' trip. Stamina is critical here and the extra circuit significantly reduces the importance of early pace and draw. Look for proven stayers with strong late-race finishing speed. This distance often produces the most competitive and exciting races at the venue.
The marathon trip at Nottingham. Only specialist stayers should be considered. The race is won by fitness, stamina, and racing intelligence rather than raw speed. Trainer form and preparation become important factors at this distance.
How to read this: In a fair 6-runner race, each trap would win ~17% and place (finish 1st or 2nd) ~33% of the time.
Win% = how often this trap produces the winner. Place% = how often this trap finishes 1st or 2nd (standard place bet).
+ / − columns show the difference from fair share — positive means the trap wins/places more than expected, negative means less.
| Trap | Runs | Wins | Win% | +/− | 1st/2nd | Place% | +/− | Avg Pos |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | 1 | 7.7% | -9.0 | 4 | 30.8% | -2.5 | 3.23 |
| 2 | 15 | 3 | 20.0% | +3.3 | 7 | 46.7% | +13.4 | 3.07 |
| 3 | 13 | 4 | 30.8% | +14.1 | 5 | 38.5% | +5.2 | 2.85 |
| 4 | 10 | 2 | 20.0% | +3.3 | 4 | 40.0% | +6.7 | 3.40 |
| 5 | 13 | 3 | 23.1% | +6.4 | 6 | 46.2% | +12.9 | 2.92 |
| 6 | 12 | 1 | 8.3% | -8.4 | 3 | 25.0% | -8.3 | 3.92 |
| Trap | Runs | Wins | Win% | +/− | 1st/2nd | Place% | +/− | Avg Pos |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 342 | 57 | 16.7% | 0.0 | 127 | 37.1% | +3.8 | 3.24 |
| 2 | 337 | 69 | 20.5% | +3.8 | 131 | 38.9% | +5.6 | 3.24 |
| 3 | 322 | 65 | 20.2% | +3.5 | 120 | 37.3% | +4.0 | 3.26 |
| 4 | 289 | 56 | 19.4% | +2.7 | 91 | 31.5% | -1.8 | 3.52 |
| 5 | 331 | 50 | 15.1% | -1.6 | 114 | 34.4% | +1.1 | 3.46 |
| 6 | 294 | 46 | 15.6% | -1.1 | 111 | 37.8% | +4.5 | 3.29 |
| Trap | Runs | Wins | Win% | +/− | 1st/2nd | Place% | +/− | Avg Pos |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 105 | 31 | 29.5% | +12.8 | 55 | 52.4% | +19.1 | 2.74 |
| 2 | 115 | 18 | 15.7% | -1.0 | 44 | 38.3% | +5.0 | 3.34 |
| 3 | 97 | 25 | 25.8% | +9.1 | 46 | 47.4% | +14.1 | 2.97 |
| 4 | 110 | 21 | 19.1% | +2.4 | 36 | 32.7% | -0.6 | 3.46 |
| 5 | 100 | 12 | 12.0% | -4.7 | 28 | 28.0% | -5.3 | 3.64 |
| 6 | 105 | 11 | 10.5% | -6.2 | 26 | 24.8% | -8.5 | 3.51 |
| Trap | Runs | Wins | Win% | +/− | 1st/2nd | Place% | +/− | Avg Pos |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2852 | 523 | 18.3% | +1.6 | 1126 | 39.5% | +6.2 | 3.19 |
| 2 | 2765 | 555 | 20.1% | +3.4 | 1094 | 39.6% | +6.3 | 3.23 |
| 3 | 2641 | 478 | 18.1% | +1.4 | 887 | 33.6% | +0.3 | 3.41 |
| 4 | 2783 | 494 | 17.8% | +1.1 | 927 | 33.3% | 0.0 | 3.44 |
| 5 | 2967 | 527 | 17.8% | +1.1 | 1064 | 35.9% | +2.6 | 3.36 |
| 6 | 2696 | 409 | 15.2% | -1.5 | 879 | 32.6% | -0.7 | 3.43 |
| Trap | Runs | Wins | Win% | +/− | 1st/2nd | Place% | +/− | Avg Pos |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 30 | 5 | 16.7% | 0.0 | 13 | 43.3% | +10.0 | 2.87 |
| 2 | 35 | 7 | 20.0% | +3.3 | 16 | 45.7% | +12.4 | 2.77 |
| 3 | 40 | 10 | 25.0% | +8.3 | 21 | 52.5% | +19.2 | 2.85 |
| 4 | 29 | 4 | 13.8% | -2.9 | 8 | 27.6% | -5.7 | 3.52 |
| 5 | 28 | 3 | 10.7% | -6.0 | 8 | 28.6% | -4.7 | 3.71 |
| 6 | 27 | 3 | 11.1% | -5.6 | 8 | 29.6% | -3.7 | 3.85 |
| Trap | Runs | Wins | Win% | +/− | 1st/2nd | Place% | +/− | Avg Pos |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | 2 | 18.2% | +1.5 | 7 | 63.6% | +30.3 | 2.55 |
| 2 | 11 | 4 | 36.4% | +19.7 | 4 | 36.4% | +3.1 | 3.00 |
| 3 | 9 | 3 | 33.3% | +16.6 | 5 | 55.6% | +22.3 | 2.44 |
| 4 | 10 | 0 | 0.0% | -16.7 | 5 | 50.0% | +16.7 | 3.50 |
| 5 | 4 | 1 | 25.0% | +8.3 | 1 | 25.0% | -8.3 | 3.25 |
| 6 | 5 | 0 | 0.0% | -16.7 | 0 | 0.0% | -33.3 | 4.00 |
| Trap | Runs | Wins | Win% | +/− | 1st/2nd | Place% | +/− | Avg Pos |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | -16.7 | 0 | 0.0% | -33.3 | 3.00 |
| 2 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% | +33.3 | 2 | 100.0% | +66.7 | 1.50 |
| 3 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% | +33.3 | 1 | 50.0% | +16.7 | 3.00 |
| 4 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | -16.7 | 1 | 50.0% | +16.7 | 3.50 |
| 5 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | -16.7 | 0 | 0.0% | -33.3 | 4.00 |
| 6 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | -16.7 | 0 | 0.0% | -33.3 | 3.50 |
How often each going allowance occurs and its effect on run times. Positive = fast ground, negative = slow/heavy.
| Going | Label | Races | Avg Run Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| -60 | Very Heavy | 3 | 28.89s |
| -50 | Very Heavy | 4 | 31.53s |
| -40 | Very Heavy | 12 | 31.54s |
| -30 | Heavy | 9 | 31.63s |
| -20 | Heavy | 21 | 30.56s |
| -10 | Slow | 66 | 30.24s |
| 0 | Normal | 188 | 26.09s |
| +10 | Fast | 534 | 26.85s |
| +20 | Very Fast | 792 | 28.56s |
| +30 | Very Fast | 932 | 30.50s |
| +40 | Very Fast | 932 | 30.79s |
| +50 | Very Fast | 541 | 30.98s |
| +60 | Very Fast | 241 | 31.20s |
| +70 | Very Fast | 80 | 31.20s |
| +80 | Very Fast | 32 | 32.07s |
| +90 | Very Fast | 11 | 35.89s |
| +100 | Very Fast | 4 | 40.40s |
| +110 | Very Fast | 1 | 30.78s |
| +120 | Very Fast | 1 | 30.77s |
| Trainer | Runners | Wins | Win% | Places | Place% | Win P&L | Place P&L |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ★K L Windebank | 4 | 2 | 50% | 2 | 50% | +£1.10 | £-1.23 |
| R Lambe | 3 | 1 | 33% | 1 | 33% | +£4.00 | £-0.50 |
| K Wilton | 58 | 18 | 31% | 22 | 38% | +£26.59 | £-13.85 |
| B Denby | 92 | 26 | 28% | 39 | 42% | +£2.91 | £-23.31 |
| P Timmins | 12 | 3 | 25% | 7 | 58% | £-0.04 | +£4.30 |
| E O Driver | 76 | 18 | 24% | 32 | 42% | £-4.69 | £-18.84 |
| L Cook | 38 | 8 | 21% | 17 | 45% | £-10.10 | £-6.96 |
| M T Munslow | 44 | 9 | 20% | 22 | 50% | £-11.12 | £-5.61 |
| P J Wilson | 31 | 6 | 19% | 8 | 26% | +£3.08 | £-14.54 |
| F Macklin | 58 | 11 | 19% | 16 | 28% | £-7.91 | £-24.30 |
| J Daly | 64 | 11 | 17% | 17 | 27% | £-19.25 | £-32.48 |
| S W Deakin | 26 | 4 | 15% | 4 | 15% | £-2.30 | £-17.07 |
| K A Lempard | 14 | 2 | 14% | 6 | 43% | £-7.50 | £-2.22 |
| J R Hall | 7 | 1 | 14% | 2 | 29% | +£0.00 | £-1.75 |
| P M Holland | 14 | 2 | 14% | 3 | 21% | £-10.53 | £-9.94 |
Min 3 runners · £1 level stakes at SP · Sorted by win rate
| Dog | Runs | Wins | Win% | Places | Best Time | Avg Pos | Last Run |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ★Platinumheatwave | 3 | 3 | 100% | 3 | 18.09s | 1.00 | 2026-05-27 |
| Emers Summer | 2 | 2 | 100% | 2 | 17.83s | 1.00 | 2026-05-29 |
| Bills Lassie | 4 | 3 | 75% | 3 | 29.99s | 2.00 | 2026-05-27 |
| Bene N Hot | 4 | 3 | 75% | 3 | 30.70s | 2.25 | 2026-05-27 |
| Drombane Bono | 4 | 3 | 75% | 3 | 18.70s | 1.75 | 2026-05-28 |
| Noirs Fly | 4 | 3 | 75% | 3 | 30.62s | 1.50 | 2026-05-28 |
| Triller | 4 | 3 | 75% | 3 | 31.02s | 1.75 | 2026-05-27 |
| Swift Doireann | 4 | 3 | 75% | 4 | 30.33s | 1.25 | 2026-05-29 |
| Aegean Song | 3 | 2 | 67% | 3 | 30.38s | 1.33 | 2026-05-27 |
| Kylenoe Stan | 3 | 2 | 67% | 2 | 30.41s | 2.33 | 2026-05-18 |
| Headford Spider | 3 | 2 | 67% | 2 | 30.64s | 1.67 | 2026-05-29 |
| Swift Kipper | 3 | 2 | 67% | 2 | 28.82s | 2.00 | 2026-05-18 |
| Furcombe Hall | 3 | 2 | 67% | 2 | 30.95s | 2.33 | 2026-05-20 |
| Magic Hands | 3 | 2 | 67% | 2 | 29.69s | 2.00 | 2026-05-18 |
| Crafty Coco | 3 | 2 | 67% | 2 | 18.28s | 2.00 | 2026-05-27 |
Min 2 runs · Sorted by win rate then volume
How often the shortest-priced dog (market favourite) wins and places at Nottingham. National average favourite win rate is approximately 30%.
Races analysed
3,959
Fav wins
33%
1322 wins
Fav places (top 2)
56%
2199 places
Avg winning SP
4.23
decimal odds
Fastest adjusted times in our database for each distance at Nottingham.
Newinn Bachelor
14.87s · OR3 · 2025-11-17
Roanna Mamba
17.52s · OR2 · 2025-12-08
Droopys Poker
28.28s · OR3 · 2025-10-06
Proper Heiress
29.25s · OR1 · 2025-11-24
Vale Bluebell
41.71s · OR · 2025-10-06
Mongys Wild
44.42s · OR1 · 2025-09-08
Greenwell Gypsy
57.11s · OR3 · 2026-03-16
Breakdown of race grades at Nottingham. Shows the type and quality of racing the track hosts.
HP
709 (15%)
A3
645 (14%)
A4
551 (12%)
A5
532 (11%)
A2
432 (9%)
A6
369 (8%)
OR
255 (5%)
A7
234 (5%)
OR3
213 (5%)
A1
137 (3%)
D2
104 (2%)
D3
100 (2%)
A8
77 (2%)
D4
70 (1%)
OR1
64 (1%)
IT
52 (1%)
D1
23 (0%)
A9
21 (0%)
B2
21 (0%)
OR2
19 (0%)
B3
12 (0%)
B5
7 (0%)
B4
6 (0%)
S2
5 (0%)
IV
5 (0%)
S1
4 (0%)
D5
4 (0%)
B8
4 (0%)
B1
1 (0%)
B7
1 (0%)
B6
1 (0%)
At Nottingham, trust the form book more than the trap draw. Your analysis should be weighted heavily towards performance ratings, class, and course form rather than which box a dog has been allocated. While inside-drawn dogs have a very slight edge (as at all anti-clockwise tracks), it's nowhere near as significant as at Monmore or Romford.
This is one of the best tracks for systematic place betting. The fair racing and long home straight mean that quality dogs consistently finish in the frame. If you can identify genuine class dogs running in lower grades, place betting at Nottingham offers some of the most reliable returns in the sport. Our prediction accuracy tends to be among the highest at this venue precisely because quality tells so reliably.
Keep an eye on going conditions and the weather. Nottingham's open location means the track can change character in heavy rain — when the going turns slow, inside-drawn dogs gain a slight extra advantage and front-runners hold their positions more easily. On fast ground, the track is at its fairest and the home straight is most effective for closers.
| Date | Time | Dist | Grade | Winner | Trap | Time | SP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-29 | 21:48 | 500m | A4 | Aremagicaremagic | 3 | 29.92s | 6/1 |
| 2026-05-29 | 21:28 | 500m | A1 | Stellas Smartie | 5 | 29.80s | 11/8F |
| 2026-05-29 | 21:08 | 500m | A6 | Silverwing | 5 | 30.58s | 9/4 |
| 2026-05-29 | 20:48 | 500m | A3 | Soapbox Keli | 4 | 29.69s | 9/4F |
| 2026-05-29 | 20:28 | 680m | S1 | Mallogs Miley | 6 | 41.96s | 5/1 |
| 2026-05-29 | 20:08 | 500m | A2 | Wolf Gold | 3 | 29.43s | 5/2F |
| 2026-05-29 | 19:48 | 500m | A2 | Rosie Jackell | 2 | 29.90s | 13/8F |
| 2026-05-29 | 19:28 | 500m | A5 | Swift Doireann | 1 | 30.61s | 2/1 |
| 2026-05-29 | 19:08 | 305m | D1 | Emers Summer | 1 | 17.71s | 8/13F |
| 2026-05-29 | 18:48 | 500m | A1 | Skeard Daisy May | 2 | 29.40s | 4/6F |
| 2026-05-29 | 18:28 | 500m | A3 | Skyfall Kitzie | 3 | 30.12s | 6/4F |
| 2026-05-29 | 18:08 | 500m | A4 | Saleen Stunner | 3 | 30.10s | 9/4 |
| 2026-05-28 | 13:52 | 500m | A3 | Coin Box | 2 | 29.88s | 7/2 |
| 2026-05-28 | 13:36 | 500m | A4 | Princes Legacy | 1 | 30.16s | 5/4F |
| 2026-05-28 | 13:21 | 500m | A4 | Springwood Frida | 3 | 30.37s | 7/1 |
| 2026-05-28 | 13:06 | 500m | A4 | Nidderdalesummer | 3 | 30.32s | 7/2 |
| 2026-05-28 | 12:48 | 500m | HP | Noirs Fly | 5 | 30.04s | 7/2 |
| 2026-05-28 | 12:31 | 500m | A3 | Invincia Jet | 3 | 29.85s | 11/4 |
| 2026-05-28 | 12:14 | 500m | A5 | Wolf Flare | 4 | 30.43s | 6/1 |
| 2026-05-28 | 11:58 | 500m | A2 | Skyfall Boss Man | 4 | 29.88s | 15/8F |
| 2026-05-28 | 11:41 | 305m | D4 | Drombane Bono | 2 | 18.40s | 7/2 |
| 2026-05-28 | 11:25 | 500m | A7 | Honour Tracy | 2 | 30.38s | 7/4 |
| 2026-05-27 | 13:52 | 500m | A2 | De Lifeofriley | 2 | 30.07s | 10/3 |
| 2026-05-27 | 13:36 | 500m | HP | Triller | 6 | 30.78s | 4/1 |
| 2026-05-27 | 13:21 | 500m | HP | Rondayhere | 5 | 30.64s | 11/10F |
| 2026-05-27 | 13:06 | 500m | A3 | Bills Lassie | 5 | 30.24s | 9/1 |
| 2026-05-27 | 12:48 | 500m | A5 | Cooliodolly | 2 | 30.28s | 6/5F |
| 2026-05-27 | 12:31 | 500m | A6 | Churchill Queen | 4 | 30.73s | 1/1F |
| 2026-05-27 | 12:14 | 500m | HP | Ballyhimikin Lee | 3 | 30.33s | 10/11F |
| 2026-05-27 | 11:58 | 500m | HP | Lemon Shirley | 5 | 30.51s | 9/4 |
| 2026-05-27 | 11:41 | 500m | A1 | Stonepark Nathan | 1 | 29.80s | 4/1 |
| 2026-05-27 | 11:25 | 305m | D2 | Fancroftmawbaker | 4 | 17.99s | 6/5F |
Data from 2017-01-09 to 2026-06-01 · 4,678 races analysed · 651 meetings
© ratethat.dog — The definitive greyhound racing analytics platform
Interference & Run Comment Patterns
The 10 most common run comments from the last 1,000 completed runs. High rates of "crowded" or "checked" indicate a track where interference affects results.
ClrRun
231/1000 runs (23%)
SAw
145/1000 runs (14%)
Mid
134/1000 runs (13%)
Crd1
118/1000 runs (12%)
EP
95/1000 runs (10%)
Crd3
92/1000 runs (9%)
Rls
80/1000 runs (8%)
W
79/1000 runs (8%)
Rls-Mid
79/1000 runs (8%)
Mid-Rls
69/1000 runs (7%)