| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Markstreet Lilyb 2y 18 | T D Coote — 19% R575 W110 P292 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 50 | 40 | 74 (1) | 39 (5) | 50 (3) | 36 (2) | 58 (6) | 50 (2) | 48 (4) | 46 (4) | 44 (3) | - | 29 | 32 | 27 | 44 | 48 | 41 | 2 | 5/1 | |
| 2 | ▶ Hazelgrove Duskb 2y 7 | W M Lyons — 19% R1048 W203 P559 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 49 | 42 | 78 (1) | 57 (3) | 76 (1) | 63 (2) | 60 (3) | 54 (3) | 31 (4) | 61 (5) | 74 (3) | - | 39 | 29 | 14 | 10 | 49 | 41 | 4 | 2/1F | |
| 3 | ▶ Pounda Prisnab 5y 25 | J G Hurst — 18% R272 W49 P154 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 51 | 50 | 43 (5) | 50 (2) | 48 (4) | 75 (6) | 69 (1) | 57 (1) | 53 (2) | 23 (3) | 58 (6) | - | 53 | 43 | 32 | 39 | 51 | 49 | 3 | 9/4 | |
| 4 | ▶ Grumpy Miab 2y 18 | N Langley — 16% R209 W33 P116 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 44 | 52 | 40 (6) | 43 (6) | 54 (6) | 46 (2) | 50 (3) | 37 (4) | 49 (6) | 70 (5) | 41 (1) | - | 63 | 43 | 37 | 38 | 52 | 52 | 1 | 10/3 | |
| 5 | ▶ Hazelgrove Amanib 3y 8 | W M Lyons — 19% R1048 W203 P559 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 49 | 64 | 70 (1) | 54 (3) | 47 (3) | 45 (6) | 56 (2) | 46 (5) | 68 (1) | 42 (5) | 64 (1) | 56 (3) | 30 | 31 | 16 | 24 | 47 | 39 | 5 | 14/1 | |
| 6 | ▶ Julies Treatb 2y 17 | T D Coote — 19% R575 W110 P292 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 44 | 44 | 55 (4) | 40 (5) | 48 (6) | 43 (5) | 75 (5) | 61 (2) | 76 (3) | 47 (1) | 61 (5) | - | 22 | 33 | 28 | 33 | 45 | 37 | 6 | 5/1 | |
Grumpy Mia is the most complete package in this field. Best P (52), AR profile (EP51, CS45, pc88), and crucially the best trap suitability in the entire race at 63 — an exceptional individual record from T4. Her suit mean of 45.2 is the highest, with track suit 43, distance suit 38, trap suit 63, and class suit 37 all confirming strong Kinsley 462m credentials. Form is reliably good: 41→59→70→65 — three consecutive 59+ runs with a peak of 70 that represents genuine A5 quality. The AR profile is the perfect pace type for this race shape: she has enough EP (51) to sit close behind Amani through the first bend, and enough CS (45) to maintain position as the Closers close. In a Closer-heavy race on a front-runner track, the All-Rounder who can both lead and sustain has the tactical advantage — she doesn't need the pace to collapse to win, she just needs to be within striking distance at the second bend. T4 at 18.04% from 327 runs is above average. Trainer Langley at 18% is moderate but the dog's consistent high-level form speaks for itself.
DANGER: DOMINANT trap (24.63%) + best CS (76) + consistent 50+ form. In a Closer-heavy race where the pace will collapse, the rail gives her the shortest route to the lead when Amani fades. Trap suit 29 introduces some doubt.
Best pace consistency (94) and prior form at 59-65 show genuine ability, but latest crash to 28 is too concerning. Cannot be backed until she bounces back.
Latest 69 is the best recent form in the field and suit mean 41.8 is excellent, but form volatility (23 to 69 in two starts) makes her too unreliable. Could win or finish last.
Will lead through the first bend (EP57, bend64) but DEAD trap (11.18%) + Fader CS35 over 462m = the lead evaporates. Four Closers behind her will all pass. Her role is pace-setter, not winner.
Same AR profile as Mia but 7 points lower on P, 19 points lower on suit mean, and worse speed. Will track the pace but lacks the ability to win. Mid-field finisher.
LOW SEPARATION — R1 17.44% vs R3 16.39% (1.05pp gap). T1 strongly DOMINANT at 24.63%. T5 DEAD at 11.18%. This race has an unusual Closer-heavy field (4 of 6) on a front-runner track — the two All-Rounders have a pace profile advantage.
T1:24.63% T2:16.12% T3:17.20% T4:18.04% T5:11.18% T6:17.45%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 462m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Pace Profile
Avg early pace vs closing speed from last 5 runs
| Dog | Early | Close | Style |
|---|---|---|---|
1Markstreet Lily | 41 | 76 | Closer |
2Hazelgrove Dusk | 42 | 70 | Closer |
3Pounda Prisna | 49 | 55 | Closer |
4Grumpy Mia | 51 | 45 | All-Rounder |
5Hazelgrove Amani | 57 | 35 | Fader |
6Julies Treat | 52 | 41 | All-Rounder |
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.