Loading racecard
Loading...
Loading racecard
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Class | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Rating | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Cotswold Miladyb 1y 211 | M N May — 17% R267 W45 P105 Trainer form — last 3 months | 39 | 100 | 71 (1) | 63 (1) | 51 (2) | 29 (1) | 56 (2) | 43 (3) | 21 (4) | 37 (6) | 48 (4) | 51 (4) | 50 | 28 | - | 28 | 36 | 37 | 5 | 5/1 | ||
| 2 | ▶ Speedy Stellab 5y 26 | J G Hurst — 18% R273 W49 P154 Trainer form — last 3 months | 43 | - | 18 (5) | 31 (1) | 29 (6) | 21 (2) | 26 (6) | 27 (3) | 27 (3) | 23 (2) | 22 (4) | - | 28 | 38 | - | 39 | 23 | 28 | 4 | 9/4F | ||
| 3 | ▶ Caddells Prideb 3y 5 | D Cooper — 19% R73 W14 P39 Trainer form — last 3 months | 50 | - | 29 (2) | 17 (2) | 52 (6) | 19 (5) | 37 (6) | 23 (1) | 30 (5) | 28 (3) | 33 (3) | - | 49 | 35 | 40 | 35 | 31 | 36 | 6 | 5/2 | ||
| 4 | ▶ Hayleys Sparkb 3y 26 | D Cooper — 19% R73 W14 P39 Trainer form — last 3 months | 49 | 50 | 71 (1) | 42 (5) | 32 (6) | 19 (1) | 23 (6) | 59 (6) | 21 (3) | 26 (6) | 31 (5) | - | 46 | 32 | 30 | 41 | 28 | 34 | 1 | 3/1 | ||
| 5 | ▶ Westfield Frankd 4y 24 | J S Atkins — 14% R295 W42 P154 Trainer form — last 3 months | 59 | 1 | 33 (4) | 35 (2) | 33 (2) | 24 (6) | 35 (3) | 35 (3) | 33 (3) | 64 (4) | 29 (5) | 42 (1) | 6 | 43 | - | 43 | 37 | 31 | 2 | 5/1 | ||
| 6 | ▶ Grumpy Sandstormd 2y 16 | N Langley — 16% R202 W32 P115 Trainer form — last 3 months | 52 | - | 23 (5) | 25 (6) | 25 (5) | 29 (4) | 27 (4) | 46 (6) | 69 (2) | 27 (5) | 27 (5) | 42 (1) | 14 | 33 | 15 | 34 | 39 | 32 | 3 | 9/1 | ||
Composite 34 sits third in the field but the analytical strength lies in pace profile perfectly suited to HP format: All-Rounder pace with 95 consistency (highest in field by far, indicating sustainable and reliable performance across race types). Speed 49 is solid mid-field, not elite but adequate. T4 at 27.0% is second-best trap position (small sample of 35 runs). Suitability across track (32), distance (41), and trap (46) shows balanced fit with distance particularly strong at 41. D Cooper (22% WR, moderate-to-strong) has placed this dog in the structurally advantageous position. Recent D3 form (22→26→31→22→19) shows volatile performances typical of a dog at the margins of a higher grade, and the most recent 19 is concerning. However, in the HP context, the All-Rounder pace profile combined with 95 consistency is the decisive factor. This is a dog that adapts to race dynamics—if early pace is quick, the dog settles; if pace slows, the dog is capable of pressing forward. This flexibility is ideal when stagger neutralises trap disadvantage and pace profile becomes the primary differentiator. Composite 34 (third-best) is not dominant over Westfield Frank's 37 or Caddells Pride's 36, but the All-Rounder + 95 consistency profile in a handicap format where adaptability matters more than pure early or late speed makes this the baseline winner. The T4 position (27.0% small sample) is secondary to the pace profile, which is the real edge.
Elite speed (59 field-best) and avgPerf (37 best) make this a class leader, but T5 draw (10.3%, trap suit 6) and pure Closer pace profile create structural headwind. Form at D1/D2 (42-42 peaks) is elite, but recent 29 is lowest in recent runs. Genuine danger if pace is strong and the elite speed can overcome T5, but structural concerns prevent strong danger rating.
Recent form collapse (24→14 recent runs), slowest speed in field (39), and below-average trainer (6% WR) make this uncompetitive. HP format elevates speed importance; this dog has the field's poorest speed rating. Can be opposed.
Improving form with last-run 27 and D5 30 perf shows upside. Speed 43 is below field but composite 28 sits mid-range. Live middle-order runner but lacks elite speed or form dominance for danger status.
Class drop from D3 (avgPerf 31 best in field, composite 36 second-best) is significant advantage. Speed 50 and above-average suitability support case. However, form consistency is at D3, not proven in HP. Live threat if class dominates but lacks proven HP form for strong danger rating.
HP specialist with 69 peak performance proves capability at exact conditions, but form volatility (69-46-27 range) and below-average overall suitability (trap suit 14 especially) suggest inconsistency. Not reliable enough for danger rating despite peak performance.
HANDICAP—trap bias de-weighted, speed/pace profile elevated. Small sample sizes per trap (28-37 runs) mean trap data is less reliable than in larger D4/D5 datasets. Staggered starts equalise position advantage. Composite separation is normal (8.4pp R1-R3 gap), so performance ratings carry weight. Speed rating becomes primary factor; pace profile (All-Rounder vs Closer vs Fader) secondary factor. Ignore T5/T1 disadvantage if the dog has compensatory speed or form advantage.
SMALL SAMPLE: T4: 27.0% (35 runs), T6: 32.1% (34 runs), T2: 21.4% (32 runs), T3: 16.2% (31 runs), T1: 13.8% (30 runs), T5: 10.3% (28 runs)
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 268m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.