| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Glenvale Beaub 4y 14 | I Zivkovic — 13% R602 W81 P284 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 44 | - | 23 (2) | 16 (4) | 24 (6) | 23 (3) | 20 (3) | 19 (4) | 15 (6) | 18 (6) | 28 (4) | - | 21 | 33 | 37 | 33 | 22 | 24 | 4 | 8/1 | |
| 2 | ▶ Teebayb 4y 36 | I Zivkovic — 13% R602 W81 P284 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 49 | 0 | 28 (1) | 27 (2) | 17 (5) | 18 (6) | 27 (2) | 24 (3) | 30 (1) | 19 (4) | 23 (2) | 19 (4) | 34 | 32 | 28 | 30 | 32 | 32 | 6 | 14/1 | |
| 3 | ▶ Racenight Emmab 3y 16 | J G Hurst — 18% R267 W48 P152 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 52 | 0 | 14 (6) | 17 (6) | 16 (6) | 19 (5) | 31 (1) | 20 (5) | 25 (4) | 17 (6) | 19 (5) | 30 (1) | 40 | 28 | 23 | 38 | 24 | 29 | 2 | 6/4F | |
| 4 | ▶ Coolavanny Nanob 3y 28 | M N May — 16% R271 W43 P106 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 51 | 100 | 21 (6) | 59 (1) | 44 (3) | 44 (3) | 38 (5) | 25 (4) | 30 (1) | 37 (5) | 19 (4) | 40 (4) | 47 | 35 | 43 | 35 | 45 | 43 | 5 | 2/1 | |
| 5 | ▶ Unique Beautyb 2y 7 | M N May — 16% R271 W43 P106 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 45 | 100 | 43 (6) | 18 (5) | 21 (3) | 20 (5) | 19 (5) | 30 (1) | 18 (5) | 18 (6) | 19 (5) | 23 (3) | 47 | 37 | 18 | 37 | 23 | 32 | 1 | 8/1 | |
| 6 | ▶ Ineedabreakb 3y 7 | W M Lyons — 19% R1040 W201 P556 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 55 | - | 29 (1) | 27 (2) | 23 (4) | 20 (5) | 23 (4) | 21 (5) | 21 (5) | 30 (1) | 25 (4) | 29 (1) | 25 | 23 | 29 | 24 | 25 | 25 | 3 | 3/1 | |
Extreme Fader (EP=100, CS=0, pace=Fader) with exceptional suitability (track 37, distance 37, trap 47, indicating above-average individual fit to these conditions). T5 is weak (15.7%, 185 runs—a structural disadvantage). Recent form shows 23→15→29→20→16 with one 29 win in five runs, indicating inconsistent form at the mid-20s level with that one 29 peak. M N May (6% WR, poor trainer) has placed the dog, a concern—the 6% win rate is the weakest in the field. Composite 32 is mid-field. Speed 45 is below-average. The pick case is tenuous: exceptional suitability (37/37/47) compensates for the weak T5 trap, but the form is inconsistent (16→20 latest, both below the 29 peak) and trainer backing is poor (6% WR). The Fader pace (EP=100, CS=0) means the dog will lead early (competing with Coolavanny Nano in T4 from T5), but whether that lead is held or fades depends on whether other runners can catch the dog late. At 268m, if the dog establishes a lead and the suitability holds true (37/37 track/distance), the dog could hold position. However, the weak recent form (16→20) and poor trainer placement (6% WR) suggest this is a marginal pick. Speculative confidence reflects the exceptional suitability as the only strong analytical signal against weak trainer backing, poor form, and weak trap position.
Extreme Fader with EP=100 and bend=100 will lead decisively from T4. Structural early-pace advantage at 268m is real threat. However, CS=0 (zero reserve late) and weak recent open form (15, 22) are concerns. Danger rating due to lead potential but form quality limits confidence.
Two 28 D5 wins prove capability but recent drop to 18 indicates form off. Trap 1 disadvantage and form dip limit threat. Respectable but not strong case.
Dominant T2 draw is offset by five-month layoff, recent trial form (22), and lack of recent competitive D5 form. Likely needs a race to build fitness. Not immediate threat despite trap advantage.
Dead trap T3 (15.0%) combined with pure Closer pace profile (no closing space at 268m) creates double negative. Form is inconsistent (30 win among 17-19-14-18). Hard to support from this position.
Field-best speed 55 is strong feature but weak suitability (23-25 across all metrics) and recent form decline (29→18 latest) limit threat. Upside if form bounces but current trajectory downward.
Identical conditions to Race 1 and Race 3. Low separation means composite scores are noise. T2 dominance (25.4%) is structural signal. This field offers no standout utilising T2 advantage effectively and no elite suitability alignment. Competitive field with multiple viable paths to victory depending on pace shape.
T1: 17.3%, T2: 25.4% (DOMINANT, 181 runs), T3: 15.0% (WEAK, 153 runs), T4: 19.4%, T5: 15.7% (WEAK, 185 runs), T6: 18.9%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 268m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.