Loading...
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Gothic Cheyenneb 3y 15 | M P Brown — 21% R425 W89 P244 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 47 | - | 39 (1) | 30 (4) | 26 (5) | 32 (2) | 26 (5) | 35 (2) | 36 (1) | 31 (2) | 30 (3) | 33 (2) | 46 | 46 | 32 | 46 | 31 | 38 | 3 | 11/2 | |
| 2 | ▶ Whisper Dollyb 3y 26 | J M Ray — 16% R249 W39 P146 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 60 | 52 | 29 (4) | 40 (1) | 36 (1) | 36 (2) | 17 (4) | 18 (2) | 49 (5) | 29 (3) | 39 (2) | 38 (1) | 51 | 35 | 37 | 39 | 47 | 46 | 1 | 4/6F | |
| 3 | ▶ Daisys Blueboyd 2y 36 | M P Brown — 21% R425 W89 P244 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 58 | 60 | 21 (5) | 20 (5) | 22 (5) | 39 (1) | 33 (1) | 30 (2) | 99 (4) | 37 (1) | 31 (1) | - | 33 | 43 | 25 | 51 | 53 | 47 | 2 | 13/8 | |
| 4 | ▶ Spider Maxxd 4y 21 | P S Rea — 17% R520 W86 P255 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 48 | 39 | 24 (3) | 18 (6) | 27 (3) | 15 (5) | 18 (3) | 19 (2) | 72 (3) | 81 (3) | 72 (2) | 69 (2) | 44 | 43 | 12 | 47 | 63 | 55 | 5 | 7/1 | |
| 6 | ▶ Solob 4y 31 | P S Rea — 17% R520 W86 P255 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 44 | 35 | 14 (6) | 18 (5) | 30 (1) | 19 (5) | 16 (6) | 20 (4) | 17 (4) | 19 (3) | 13 (6) | 11 (6) | 27 | 20 | - | 37 | 38 | 33 | 4 | 25/1 | |
Whisper Dolly takes the projection but faces a severe structural headwind from T2 which is DEAD at 11.11% from 36 runs — one of three dead traps at these conditions. Her Fader profile (EP 70, CS 41) is reasonable for a sprint — at 220m, dogs don't have time to fade severely, so the high EP is the useful component. Speed 57 is the best in the field. Recent sprint form shows 29 (3rd), 39 (2nd), 38 (1st win) — consistent middle-of-pack D2 efforts with one win. AvgPerf 49 is mid-field. Trainer J M Ray at 16% is below awareness but has a 6.9% strike rate at 220m D2 specifically — very poor at these exact conditions. The condition data is extremely concerning: R1 composite wins just 11.11% at these conditions — the model's top pick is historically the worst outcome. This is about as speculative as it gets.
DANGER — and the AI analytical favourite. Best perf (56), best bend (62), best Front Runner profile (EP 70), 99 perf sprint win, and Brown at 36.36% at these conditions. The strongest analytical case in the race by a wide margin.
Consistent placer (2nd, 2nd, 2nd, 3rd) but DEAD T1 at 12.5% means winning is extremely unlikely. Decent individual suitability (trap 47, track 49) but aggregate data from 40 runs says T1 doesn't win at these conditions.
DOMINANT T4 (37.14%) is the most extreme structural signal on the card, but EP 8 in a 220m sprint is a total profile mismatch. The trap advantage assumes early pace — a Closer with EP 8 can't utilise it. High perf (72) is from 388m, not sprints. A fascinating clash between structure and profile.
Dead T6 (10.71%), lowest speed (42), lowest EP (30), lowest track suit (15). Nothing in the data supports a case. One to firmly oppose at 220m sprint distance.
INVERTED SEPARATION: R1 wins just 11.11% — the model's top pick is historically the WORST! R2 wins 30.61%. This is an anomalous condition where standard ratings fail completely. T4 DOMINANT at 37.14% from 35 runs — more than double expected rate. T1, T2, and T6 are all DEAD (<13%). The pick is in DEAD T2 at 11.11% — severe structural headwind.
T1:12.5% T2:11.11% T3:17.65% T4:37.14% T5:26.67% T6:10.71%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 220m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.