| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Syds Ladd 4y 55 | C J Murray — 11% R19 W2 P8 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 54 | 50 | 49 (4) | 41 (5) | 54 (4) | 66 (2) | 55 (3) | 66 (1) | 25 (2) | 17 (4) | 31 (1) | 19 (3) | 45 | 43 | 23 | 57 | 27 | 34 | 3 | 5/1 | |
| 2 | ▶ Gambrinus Unod 2y 17 | S G Tighe — 38% R63 W24 P44 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 45 | - | 22 (4) | 24 (2) | 26 (4) | 29 (3) | 31 (2) | 24 (4) | - | - | - | - | 70 | 39 | 18 | 39 | 26 | 34 | 4 | 6/4 | |
| 3 | ▶ Rocking Skyeb 2y 27 | C M Dibb — 12% R310 W38 P154 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 49 | 23 | 46 (4) | 61 (2) | 65 (1) | 24 (3) | 20 (4) | 25 (3) | 18 (5) | 24 (3) | 14 (6) | 24 (2) | 43 | 23 | 31 | 22 | 30 | 30 | 1 | 7/1 | |
| 4 | ▶ Loughside Roisinb 2y 18 | G A Foot — 19% R295 W57 P171 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 43 | 53 | 34 (3) | 37 (1) | 30 (4) | 28 (3) | 32 (1) | 21 (3) | 20 (4) | 21 (3) | 31 (1) | 22 (4) | 16 | 12 | - | 15 | 20 | 18 | 2 | 1/1F | |
| 5 | ▶ The Old Ole Taled 2y 25 | C M Dibb — 12% R310 W38 P154 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 51 | - | 18 (6) | 32 (1) | 23 (5) | 28 (1) | 23 (1) | 19 (2) | 30 (2) | 17 (1) | 21 (4) | - | 31 | 34 | 26 | 34 | 24 | 27 | 5 | 7/1 | |
Drawn in the massively DOMINANT T3 at 30.6% from 36 runs — nearly double the expected rate and the strongest structural signal on the entire card. Her avgP of 30 is the best in this weak D4 field, and form reads 23→25→25→39→22, showing a ceiling of 39 which topped this field on that occasion. The Closer profile (EP 23, CS 69) is normally a deal-breaker at 245m sprints, but the T3 structural advantage at 30.6% is so overwhelming that it overrides the tactical concern — one in three T3 dogs wins here regardless of running style. Her suitability is moderate: trap 43, distance 22, track 23 — the trap suit 43 confirms she's handled T3 specifically. Recent CD form: 2nd twice at D4 (15.21s, 15.58s) and 4th at D3 — she places consistently at this level. Speed 49 is mid-field. Trainer Dibb at 16% is average. The selection is primarily structural — T3's dominance from 36 runs is the kind of signal that overrides individual profile concerns.
DANGER: Second-best trap (23.3%) with the best sprint pace profile (EP 54, bend 53). But form is the worst in the field and suitability is near-zero everywhere. The trap + pace combination keeps her in contention despite the form.
CD winner with decent suitability but T1 is DEAD at 10.3%. The structural barrier is too severe for a dog without a clear class advantage over the field.
Elite trainer (54%) and high trap suit (70) but poor recent form. Tighe might coax a better performance but the form doesn't support this dog beating the structurally advantaged runners.
T5 at 3.2% is the single most extreme dead-trap signal across all Star Pelaw conditions today. Can be confidently opposed regardless of form or ability.
T3 massively dominant at 30.6%. T5 virtually never wins (3.2%). T1 also dead at 10.3%. CompR1 wins 27.8% — ratings have predictive value at D4. But trap bias is the bigger signal.
T1:10.3% T2:16.7% T3:30.6% T4:23.3% T5:3.2% T6:18.5%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 245m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.