Loading racecard
Loading...
Loading racecard
Owlerton Stadium Sprint
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Sunnyside Cairod 2yN/R 26 | E Soppitt — 38% R24 W9 P19 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 52 | 0 | 100 (1) | 90 (2) | 82 (3) | 100 (1) | 67 (4) | 49 (5) | 56 (5) | 64 (1) | - | - | 45 | 61 | 30 | 50 | 90 | 77 | - | - | |
| 2 | ▶ Orchid Legendd 3y 15 | M A P O'donnell — 19% R293 W55 P167 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 46 | 100 | 29 (4) | 37 (3) | 42 (1) | 32 (3) | 32 (5) | 41 (5) | 50 (3) | 48 (4) | 31 (5) | 56 (3) | 62 | 45 | 9 | 38 | 41 | 44 | 1 | 7/1 | |
| 3 | ▶ Finnery Kobed 2y 28 | S C Oxley — 18% R153 W27 P92 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 48 | - | 68 (1) | 57 (2) | 69 (1) | 44 (2) | 47 (1) | 49 (5) | 36 (3) | 48 (1) | 37 (2) | 42 (1) | 32 | 68 | - | 68 | 39 | 45 | 4 | 7/4 | |
| 4 | ▶ Droopys Statd 2y 25 | H J Dimmock — 19% R169 W32 P94 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 36 | 100 | 52 (4) | 50 (4) | 59 (1) | 51 (2) | 82 (2) | 76 (3) | 41 (2) | 36 (4) | 48 (6) | 43 (4) | 21 | 18 | - | - | 47 | 37 | 2 | 6/1 | |
| 5 | ▶ Not So Slowd 3y 4 | W B L Hamilton — 33% R15 W5 P8 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 54 | 0 | 53 (3) | 83 (2) | 57 (3) | 71 (1) | 73 (3) | 44 (5) | 74 (5) | 100 (1) | 68 (6) | 94 (2) | 61 | 62 | 61 | 55 | 62 | 61 | 3 | 8/11F | |
The predicted winner with the textbook sprint profile — EP 100, bend 100, Fader with pace consistency 85. She'll fly out of T2, hit the bend first, and try to hold on. T2 wins 27.3% at these conditions, the second-best trap. Won last time at Sheffield 280m D2 (perf 42) and has shown form at this distance (P1 at D2, P3 at D2). AvgPerf of 41 is modest and well below Sunnyside Cairo's 90, but at 280m the pace profile can overcome raw ability — front runners are so advantaged that a weaker dog with max EP can hold off a stronger dog with no EP. Speed 46 and trap suit 62 both support the sprint credentials. The concern is that she's been inconsistent — P1→P3→P5→P5→P3 with only that latest win breaking a string of moderate efforts.
DANGER — pure Closer at 280m should be opposed but avgPerf 90 represents an enormous class gap over this field. T1 dominant draw and elite trainer compensate for wrong pace profile. Could easily win.
Best suitability scores in the field (trk68, dist68) but below-average perf and no pace data make her hard to assess. CD form exists but consistency is lacking.
Right pace profile (EP 100, bend 100) but wrong draw (T4 at 15.8%) and zero distance suitability. Sprint ability evident from trial wins but hasn't proven it at 280m competitively.
Good raw numbers (perf 62, speed 54) and strong trainer but Closer profile from the dead T5 trap at 280m is an insurmountable combination. Can be confidently opposed.
Strong inside bias at 280m — T1+T2 combine for 58% wins. T5 is effectively dead at 5.6%. Low sample sizes but the directional signal is clear: inside draws dominate sprints at Sheffield.
T1:30.8% T2:27.3% T3:22.7% T4:15.8% T5:5.6% T6:11.8%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 280m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.