Loading...
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Lets Go Yankeesd 2y 9 | C Gardiner — 22% R365 W79 P201 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 54 | 50 | 40 (1) | 28 (5) | 36 (3) | 31 (5) | 31 (5) | 41 (1) | 65 (2) | 34 (2) | 35 (2) | 36 (2) | 79 | 59 | - | 68 | 47 | 55 | 2 | 5/1 | |
| 2 | ▶ Untold Tetherd 2y 28 | S Maplesden — 17% R274 W46 P151 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 46 | 25 | 56 (3) | 55 (4) | 61 (4) | 63 (4) | 81 (1) | 76 (1) | 43 (6) | 32 (3) | 35 (2) | 40 (1) | 44 | 47 | 15 | 45 | 38 | 41 | 3 | 4/1 | |
| 3 | ▶ Buzzingerd 1y 14 | P J Browne — 16% R115 W18 P64 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 54 | - | 25 (5) | 25 (4) | 28 (5) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 80 | 61 | - | 61 | - | 24 | 1 | 5/2 | |
| 4 | ▶ The Hilld 4y 36 | S A Cahill — 19% R380 W73 P227 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 54 | 100 | 28 (4) | 32 (5) | 100 (1) | 46 (1) | 41 (2) | 28 (5) | 31 (4) | 42 (1) | 31 (4) | 29 (5) | 39 | 35 | 26 | 40 | 38 | 38 | 5 | 8/1 | |
| 5 | ▶ Curtin Raiserd 3y 16 | S A Cahill — 19% R380 W73 P227 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 51 | - | 25 (6) | 34 (4) | 30 (5) | 44 (1) | 35 (2) | 46 (1) | 30 (4) | 39 (2) | 26 (5) | 41 (1) | 60 | 36 | 28 | 36 | 36 | 39 | 4 | 11/10F | |
Only three career runs, so the data is limited — but what there is points strongly in one direction. P J Browne at 42% (strong-tier) has placed this dog in T3, which wins 31.51% of Hove 285m D1 races from 73 runs — nearly double the expected rate. That's not a coincidence: Browne places dogs to win, and T3 at this distance is where he's chosen to put an improving young dog. Form shows P2, P1, P1 — two wins from three starts in what are likely debut-level races. The suitability data supports the placement: TSuit 61, DSuit 61, TrpS 80 (the highest in the field). Speed 54 matches the best in the race. The AP of 0 reflects insufficient data rather than poor ability — the model needs more runs to calculate a meaningful average. The risk is inexperience: three career runs means this dog could do anything. But the combination of a dominant trainer, the statistically best practical trap, and winning debut form makes this a calculated bet on quality over data quantity.
DANGER: Best AP (47), excellent suitability (DSuit 68, TrpS 79), and proven CD form. The inconsistent form and lack of explosive EP prevent a pick, but he's the most dangerous runner if things fall right.
Closer in a sprint from the worst trap — the data doesn't support this dog in any scenario. EP19 means she'll be lengths behind before the first bend. Strongly opposed.
Explosive early pace (EP100, bend 100) from the worst possible draw. T4 at 10% is a structural problem that raw speed alone can't solve. Would be the pick from T3 or T5 — from T4 he's one to oppose.
Best trap statistically (33.33%) but the dog lacks the ability to exploit it fully. AP36 and inconsistent form (30→44→35→46→30) suggest the trap is doing the heavy lifting. Place chance at best.
Massive trap biases. T3 at 31.51% and T5 at 33.33% are the dominant draws — both nearly double the expected 16.67% share. T2 and T4 are dead draws at 10%. In a sprint where early positioning is everything, trap position is the primary analytical factor.
T1:20%(65) T2:10.29%(68) T3:31.51%(73) T4:10%(70) T5:33.33%(57) T6:28.57%(70)
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 285m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.