We race every Monday afternoon, Tuesday night, Friday morning and Saturday night
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Insane Simoneb 5y 55 | G Andreas — 18% R284 W50 P149 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 47 | 48 | 56 (3) | 46 (4) | 46 (4) | 20 (5) | 31 (1) | 75 (1) | 46 (5) | 45 (6) | 58 (2) | 65 (2) | 45 | 39 | - | 18 | 58 | 49 | 1 | 9/4 | |
| 2 | ▶ Head To Townd 5y 25 | S Mavrias — 17% R242 W42 P134 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 48 | - | 18 (5) | 27 (3) | 16 (6) | 26 (2) | 29 (1) | 18 (5) | 17 (5) | 18 (6) | 21 (5) | 19 (5) | 36 | 38 | 33 | 18 | 21 | 26 | 3 | 9/2 | |
| 3 | ▶ Draconian Timesb 1yN/R 16 | L E Morrison — 23% R192 W45 P120 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 48 | 52 | 58 (2) | 39 (6) | 48 (4) | 48 (5) | 54 (3) | 45 (5) | 38 (4) | 28 (1) | 22 (2) | 21 (4) | 40 | 52 | - | 62 | 40 | 44 | - | - | |
| 4 | ▶ Same Againb 5y 25 | G Andreas — 18% R284 W50 P149 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 54 | - | 26 (3) | 15 (6) | 19 (5) | 18 (5) | 25 (2) | 22 (5) | 23 (5) | 24 (5) | 28 (3) | - | 29 | 22 | 35 | 19 | 25 | 25 | 4 | 11/4 | |
| 5 | ▶ Imokilly Florab 3y 4 | G L Davidson — 13% R236 W30 P106 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 45 | - | 26 (4) | 31 (1) | 24 (4) | 24 (3) | 19 (5) | 13 (6) | 25 (3) | 22 (6) | 23 (5) | 31 (1) | 3 | 47 | 31 | 39 | 26 | 25 | 5 | 11/1 | |
| 6 | ▶ Financial Ruind 2y 17 | B D O'sullivan — 18% R539 W96 P298 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 52 | - | 24 (3) | 11 (6) | 31 (1) | 25 (2) | 26 (2) | 21 (4) | 26 (2) | 22 (4) | 23 (3) | 24 (3) | 39 | 26 | 29 | 19 | 23 | 27 | 2 | 6/4F | |
Insane Simone is the undeniable class act in this field, rated almost 20 points above her nearest rival on average performance. She ran a creditable second in a trial last week and has posted some explosive figures including a 76 two starts back. The concern is obvious — trap 1 is structurally poor at these conditions, winning barely 14% from nearly 200 runs, and her closing style doesn't suit a tight sprint where front runners hold sway. However, her raw ability advantage over this field is so significant that even from a poor draw, she has the quality to overcome the structural headwind. Whether she does so consistently enough is the question.
Outstanding course and distance form from a dominant trap with an ideal running style. The main threat to the pick.
Best draw in the race but well below the required standard on form. Structural advantage alone isn't enough here.
Moderate ability in a neutral draw. Others have stronger claims from better structural positions.
Good course record historically but current form is poor and the wide draw doesn't suit. Hard to make a case tonight.
Led last time from this trap and could be prominent early, but not sure he has enough to hold off the classier rivals.
LOW separation race — R1 wins 22.9% vs R3 at 18.6%. T2 and T3 are dominant boxes. T1 is a dead draw. Ratings are tiebreakers here; structural position matters more.
T1:13.8% T2:24.3% T3:22.4% T4:15.6% T5:14.1% T6:19.6%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 277m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.