Loading racecard
Loading...
Loading racecard
The future of racing: PGR TV
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Class | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Rating | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Yassoo Nanb 5y 24 | G Andreas — 18% R280 W51 P145 Trainer form — last 3 months | 48 | - | 36 (2) | 36 (1) | 36 (1) | 29 (3) | 17 (6) | 28 (4) | 34 (6) | 30 (1) | 29 (3) | - | 49 | 38 | 36 | 30 | 27 | 34 | 3 | 9/2 | ||
| 2 | ▶ Eire Beetled 5y 33 | M Mavrias — 20% R336 W66 P182 Trainer form — last 3 months | 50 | - | 22 (3) | 19 (4) | 24 (3) | 27 (3) | 24 (5) | 26 (4) | 31 (1) | 27 (2) | 28 (2) | 24 (2) | 31 | 32 | 26 | 26 | 26 | 28 | 6 | 14/1 | ||
| 3 | ▶ Up Ta Hilld 2y 16 | N F Carter — 16% R243 W39 P128 Trainer form — last 3 months | 52 | 100 | 26 (4) | 21 (6) | 31 (3) | 31 (3) | 27 (4) | 30 (2) | 19 (6) | 63 (5) | 40 (5) | 45 (4) | 21 | 26 | 37 | 26 | 40 | 33 | 4 | 11/8F | ||
| 4 | ▶ Whitehills Gentd 2y 17 | M Mavrias — 20% R336 W66 P182 Trainer form — last 3 months | 54 | - | 21 (6) | 29 (4) | 38 (2) | 28 (4) | 28 (3) | 28 (4) | 31 (2) | 27 (4) | 28 (2) | 26 (4) | 34 | 31 | 13 | 18 | 28 | 29 | 5 | 9/4 | ||
| 5 | ▶ Speedy Elmb 3y 26 | D P Brabon — 24% R347 W82 P205 Trainer form — last 3 months | 45 | 0 | 74 (2) | 79 (1) | 75 (1) | 71 (1) | 59 (2) | 35 (1) | 49 (5) | 56 (3) | 56 (4) | 49 (5) | 10 | - | - | - | 55 | 35 | 2 | 5/1 | ||
| 6 | ▶ Hollyoak Romulusd 2y 15 | R W Butler — 16% R224 W35 P110 Trainer form — last 3 months | 49 | - | 17 (6) | 27 (4) | 32 (2) | 33 (2) | 30 (3) | 32 (1) | 31 (2) | 33 (2) | 30 (1) | 24 (3) | 53 | 46 | 34 | 54 | 31 | 40 | 1 | 7/1 | ||
Hollyoak Romulus won nicely from this very trap last week in a trial, making all the running after breaking smartly. His form figures are modest — consistently in the low 30s — but that tells only half the story. His course and distance record is outstanding: three wins and seven places from ten starts, a place rate of 70% that no other dog in this race comes close to matching. His suitability scores across the board are the highest in the field — he knows this track, this distance, and this trap better than any of his rivals. In a low-separation race where the model can barely distinguish between runners, that kind of proven venue affinity is the most reliable indicator.
Extreme early pace could carry her to the front and on a tight sprint, that's often enough. The main danger with genuine win credentials.
Venue credentials are there but current form is too unreliable. Could place but hard to pick with confidence.
Reliable but rarely winning. A place contender in a low-separation race but not a likely winner.
Consistent mid-range form but a persistent non-winner at course and distance. The marginal trap advantage isn't enough.
The classiest dog on paper but wrong running style, wrong conditions, and terrible recent form. Her quality alone isn't enough to overcome these headwinds.
LOW separation race with no structural trap bias. R1 at 19.5% vs R3 at 16.5% — ratings offer minimal separation. Suitability and course and distance form become the key differentiators.
T1:17.7% T2:14.7% T3:16.8% T4:18.4% T5:16.0% T6:17.1%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 277m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.