| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Crystal Opalb 2y 16 | T D Coote — 19% R573 W110 P290 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 29 | 49 | 14 (6) | 14 (5) | 14 (6) | 17 (5) | 25 (2) | 15 (6) | 17 (5) | 28 (2) | 29 (1) | 20 (4) | 9 | 43 | - | 44 | 22 | 24 | 3 | 3/1 | |
| 2 | ▶ Coolavanny Nanob 3y 28 | M N May — 16% R271 W43 P106 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 30 | 100 | 21 (6) | 59 (1) | 44 (3) | 44 (3) | 38 (5) | 25 (4) | 30 (1) | 37 (5) | 19 (4) | 40 (4) | 37 | 34 | 41 | 34 | 38 | 37 | 1 | 4/1 | |
| 3 | ▶ Coolpeach Sarahb 2y 16 | J Robinson — 19% R295 W56 P168 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 49 | - | 56 (4) | 50 (3) | 54 (3) | 71 (1) | 45 (4) | 52 (4) | 42 (4) | 50 (4) | 25 (4) | 27 (4) | 45 | 46 | - | 46 | 27 | 35 | 5 | 6/4F | |
| 4 | ▶ Slanestown Cindyb 2y 16 | W M Lyons — 19% R1040 W201 P556 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 51 | - | 45 (6) | 76 (1) | 58 (4) | 42 (3) | 69 (5) | 27 (2) | 56 (5) | 61 (3) | 26 (2) | - | 15 | 44 | - | 44 | 39 | 35 | 6 | 8/1 | |
| 5 | ▶ Hazelgrove Dawnb 2y 26 | W M Lyons — 19% R1040 W201 P556 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 61 | 47 | 54 (5) | 69 (6) | 84 (3) | 59 (1) | 82 (4) | 67 (1) | 78 (3) | 64 (1) | 63 (2) | - | 5 | 46 | - | 49 | 61 | 45 | 2 | 5/1 | |
| 6 | ▶ Just Lucyb 4y 27 | T D Coote — 19% R573 W110 P290 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 56 | - | 29 (3) | 32 (3) | 33 (2) | 37 (1) | 59 (4) | 79 (1) | 33 (3) | 37 (2) | 35 (3) | 77 (1) | 58 | 42 | 35 | 42 | 51 | 51 | 4 | 6/1 | |
Coolavanny Nano is the model's selection here and has an extreme pace profile — she leaves the traps at maximum pace and aims to hold on for as long as possible. In a handicap sprint that exploits early speed, a dog who gets away cleanly and establishes an immediate lead can be very hard to catch at 268m. Her recent D5 form has been modest, scoring 20 and 22, but the handicapper's job is to create a level playing field, and she has the early dash to exploit any advantage. The concern is trainer M N May, who has a very poor win record of just 4%. This alone warrants extreme caution, and the Speculative rating reflects the trainer uncertainty as much as the form.
Won HP 268m here last time out — experience and quality make her the strongest case.
Poor recent form, lowest speed rating — unlikely to feature in the finish.
Limited competitive experience — unlikely to beat the more seasoned performers here.
Reasonable handicap experience at this venue but unlikely to win — mid-field expected.
Best ability in the field but pure closer at a sprint — pace profile is the fundamental problem.
Only 194 runs — small dataset. Handicap races require de-weighting of trap bias as staggered starts neutralise draw advantages. Composite Rank 1 wins 32.1% from 56 runs — strongest signal in the data. Speed rating rank 1 wins 33.3% from 54 runs. HANDICAP — trap bias de-weighted, speed and ability profile elevated.
T1:13.3% T2:20.7% T3:18.4% T4:26.3% T5:10.0% T6:31.0%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 268m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.