| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Ballymac Indob 2y 111 | A M Kibble — 21% R177 W38 P111 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 41 | 54 | 60 (1) | 44 (4) | 34 (5) | 77 (1) | 61 (2) | 58 (2) | 56 (4) | 49 (4) | 52 (5) | 50 (2) | 60 | 18 | - | 28 | 61 | 52 | 6 | 14/1 | |
| 2 | ▶ Wonkad 2y 35 | C D Hamblin — 24% R63 W15 P43 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 50 | 42 | 85 (5) | 77 (1) | 69 (2) | 60 (2) | 53 (3) | 75 (4) | 72 (2) | 83 (3) | 84 (3) | - | 49 | 32 | 20 | 29 | 70 | 58 | 5 | 4/1 | |
| 3 | ▶ Sawpit Sauvignond 4y 34 | D A Hunt — 5% R37 W2 P25 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 48 | 32 | 52 (5) | 14 (3) | 17 (4) | 80 (3) | 71 (1) | 72 (2) | 55 (2) | 73 (5) | 65 (2) | - | 34 | 52 | 31 | 60 | 68 | 61 | 2 | 7/1 | |
| 4 | ▶ Lets Go Staceyb 2y 26 | D N Lewis — 19% R47 W9 P28 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 56 | 57 | 38 (6) | 39 (6) | 88 (1) | 53 (4) | 85 (1) | 56 (4) | 70 (2) | 86 (1) | 73 (3) | 90 (1) | 60 | 78 | 45 | 60 | 74 | 71 | 1 | 9/4 | |
| 5 | ▶ Zinedine Zedogb 2y 24 | K R Hutton — 27% R121 W33 P72 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 44 | 62 | 54 (5) | 57 (5) | 76 (2) | 56 (5) | 88 (1) | 62 (5) | 88 (2) | 53 (5) | 57 (6) | 69 (5) | 6 | 56 | 30 | 35 | 67 | 55 | 3 | 11/8F | |
| 6 | ▶ Deelish Croftyd 3y 6 | K R Hutton — 27% R121 W33 P72 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 51 | 47 | 86 (2) | 74 (2) | 70 (3) | 84 (1) | 69 (4) | 60 (3) | 72 (3) | 56 (4) | 86 (2) | 73 (3) | 43 | 47 | 20 | 35 | 73 | 62 | 4 | 3/1 | |
Lets Go Stacey is the standout on suitability — track 78, distance 60, trap 60, and class 45 represent the strongest convergence of individual evidence in this race by a clear margin. Her performance rating is the best in the field and she has shown big efforts, with several ratings in the high eighties and low nineties from recent outings. She is a Fader by profile, which is worth noting at 450 metres, but at A2 grade her class edge over the field is large enough that she is likely to fade from first to first rather than from first to last. Trap 4 is just below neutral structurally at 16.24% but the individual data here is simply compelling.
Dominant trap and top trainer make this a genuine danger — the structural case here is the strongest in the race.
Inexperienced at this level, low course suitability, Fader — unlikely to feature.
Decent ability but suitability evidence is thin — one to watch for future runs when he has more Oxford form.
Strong finisher but drawn in the weakest structural position. Structural headwind is a real concern.
Front-end pace only — will lead briefly then weaken. Closing speed data confirms he won't sustain.
LOW SEPARATION race — composite rank 1 wins just 16.85% while rank 3 wins 21.4%. This inverted pattern means ratings barely guide outcomes at A2. T6 is the sole dominant structural draw, but Lets Go Stacey's suitability convergence (track 78, distance 60, trap 60, class 45) is the most compelling individual package in the race.
T1:17.61% T2:18.54% T3:14.07% T4:16.24% T5:17.28% T6:21.2%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 450m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Pace Profile
Avg early pace vs closing speed from last 5 runs
| Dog | Early | Close | Style |
|---|---|---|---|
1Ballymac Indo | 56 | 6 | Fader |
2Wonka | 45 | 63 | Closer |
3Sawpit Sauvignon | 33 | 82 | Closer |
4Lets Go Stacey | 55 | 37 | Fader |
5Zinedine Zedog | 68 | 0 | Fader |
6Deelish Crofty | 44 | 68 | Closer |
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.