Loading...
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Amazing Forced 3y 23 | R J Holloway — 20% R302 W61 P164 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 56 | 43 | 57 (5) | 74 (4) | 60 (4) | 76 (1) | 54 (4) | 68 (2) | 53 (4) | 61 (3) | 64 (2) | 53 (3) | 44 | 43 | 30 | 43 | 60 | 54 | 1 | 13/8F | |
| 2 | ▶ Fastlane Hoffad 3y 25 | P M Donovan — 18% R130 W23 P78 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 41 | 51 | 47 (1) | 28 (4) | 30 (5) | 29 (4) | 58 (3) | 50 (6) | 62 (5) | 88 (3) | 84 (3) | 48 (1) | 35 | 12 | - | 17 | 64 | 49 | 2 | 5/2 | |
| 3 | ▶ Bowles Bulletd 3y 25 | A J Taylor — 13% R339 W45 P158 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 51 | 55 | 35 (5) | 43 (6) | 43 (5) | 42 (5) | 68 (2) | 52 (4) | 54 (4) | 69 (2) | 64 (3) | 52 (5) | 30 | 41 | 48 | 34 | 59 | 51 | 4 | 4/1 | |
| 4 | ▶ Boogie Bulletb 2y 13 | A J Taylor — 13% R339 W45 P158 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 47 | 49 | 33 (5) | 66 (2) | 72 (1) | 51 (4) | 43 (6) | 54 (2) | 54 (3) | 54 (4) | 46 (5) | 49 (5) | 34 | 33 | 21 | 23 | 54 | 46 | 5 | 9/1 | |
| 5 | ▶ Peroni Sarahb 2y 26 | B S Green — 20% R422 W83 P248 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 39 | 33 | 70 (4) | 71 0 | 55 (1) | 61 (3) | 47 (2) | 65 (5) | 53 (1) | 54 (3) | 57 (2) | - | 3 | 37 | - | 15 | - | 6 | 6 | 16/1 | |
| 6 | ▶ Titanic Maryb 1y 15 | J T Kingsley — 14% R160 W22 P83 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 50 | 55 | 60 (2) | 41 (6) | 48 (3) | 68 (2) | 72 (1) | 63 (2) | 44 (5) | 61 (2) | 53 (4) | 55 (4) | 38 | 50 | 40 | 42 | 56 | 52 | 3 | 3/1 | |
Amazing Force commands the prediction-snapshot pick with a 54 composite score and dominant 78% closer strength indicator, positioning him as the field's primary closer threat. His T1 trap position (24.61% at Hove 500m A5) is the strongest in the field, providing a measurable 4.8 percentage-point edge over secondary traps—material advantage in marginal separation conditions. Performance rating 60 sits well above the field mid-tier, and recent form consolidation at A4 level (3rd, 2nd, 3rd, 2nd in last five outings) demonstrates reliability at near-equivalent class testing. His 56 speed ranking is solid, and the 43 bend rating paired with 78% closer strength creates late-stage execution potential aligned with Hove's fair 500m closing dynamics. Trainer Holloway's 22% A5 baseline is respectable. The convergent factors—T1 trap dominance (24.61%), 54 composite edge, 78% closer mechanics, and A4-level form consistency—create the strongest structural case. However, the marginal 2.9pp ranking gap means execution consistency rather than overwhelming dominance will determine the outcome. Force must translate mechanical advantage into racecraft.
Titanic Mary's recent form consolidation (53-63 range with 63, 61 peaks) combined with fader mechanics (55% EP) create secondary danger despite T6 trap liability (16.00%). Her early-pace establishment could hold if genuine closers falter. However, the 8.61 percentage-point trap disadvantage against Force's T1 dominance creates substantial structural headwind. Form quality compensates partially, but trap liability limits primary-pick appeal. She is a danger only if Force's closing advantage fails to translate.
Fastlane Hoffa's catastrophic recent form collapse (58→18→14→10→22) is the decisive signal. While his performance rating (64) is high and fader profile (0% CS) creates early-pace potential, the trajectory from 58 to 10 indicates form deterioration that outweighs any mechanical advantage. Zero closer strength at a 500m distance that favors closing dynamics makes him non-competitive. Form collapse eliminates contention.
Bowles Bullet's hybrid profile (42 EP, 67% CS) and T3 trap support (22.77%) create competitive secondary positioning, yet his 51 composite score (3pp below Amazing Force) and lower trainer baseline (16%) limit primary-pick appeal. Recent form is consistent (52-69 range) without peaks. Solid supporting contender but secondary to Force's structural edge.
Boogie Bullet's recent form progression (54→60) is positive, yet his 46 composite score, neutral T4 trap (19.91%), modest performance (54), and lowest trainer baseline (16%) position him as a supporting contender. His recent improvement doesn't match Amazing Force's proven A4-level reliability or superior trap positioning. Supporting role but not primary threat.
Peroni Sarah is a trial-grade prospect (three trial races totaling 12-13-22 form) jumping into A5 racing. Her composite score of 6 reflects zero established A-grade form. Weak distance suitability (15), poor class suitability (0), and T5 trap liability create compounding concerns. She is substantially outclassed by the established A-grade field. Trial racing does not predict A-grade performance.
Marginal 2.9pp gap indicates measurable but non-crushing separation. Trap positioning and form consistency matter. T1 dominance is material. Recent form momentum and closer mechanics become decisive.
T1: 24.61% | T2: 19.32% | T3: 22.77% | T4: 19.91% | T5: 17.95% | T6: 16.00%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 500m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Pace Profile
Avg early pace vs closing speed from last 5 runs
| Dog | Early | Close | Style |
|---|---|---|---|
1Amazing Force | 47 | 78 | Closer |
2Fastlane Hoffa | 68 | 0 | Fader |
3Bowles Bullet | 42 | 67 | Closer |
4Boogie Bullet | 53 | 33 | All-Rounder |
5Peroni Sarah | 39 | 67 | Closer |
6Titanic Mary | 55 | 31 | Fader |
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.