Finished 4th last time at D4 with an average performance of 33, which puts him in the middle of this field. A closer by pace profile which is the wrong style for a 280-metre sprint where early pace decides everything — closers simply do not have enough track to make up ground over this short distance. His speed rating of 41 is the slowest in the field and his best time of 16.66 is nearly six-tenths behind the quickest. Trap 2 is the worst draw at D4 Sheffield sprints at just 16.8% from 161 runs. Wrong profile, slowest pace, worst trap — too many negatives stacking up.

Finished 5th last time and has only two career runs, both disappointing. Her average performance of 23 is the lowest in the field and she has zero distance suitability — no proven 280-metre form. Speed rating of 43 is second-slowest. Trap 3 wins 20.5% from 156 runs which is a decent draw, and her trainer Draper at 24% is competitive. But with just two poor runs and no sprint experience, there is nothing here to suggest she can compete with the faster, more experienced dogs in this field.

Placed 3rd last time at D4 level and drawn in the best-performing trap at Sheffield D4 sprints — trap 5 wins 24.6% from 134 runs. Speed rating of 49 is middling and his average performance of 24 is below the field leaders. Has some distance suitability at 25 which shows proven sprint form. The dominant trap draw would normally be a significant factor but the speed deficit to Swift Mel is too large. A place prospect at best who could benefit from the trap advantage to sneak into the frame.

Finished 2nd last time at D4 which is solid placed form. Trained by Oxley at 28% — the best handler in the race. Speed rating of 54 is decent and his best time of 16.56 puts him in the mix behind the leader. His distance suitability of 31 and trap suitability of 31 are both reasonable. Trap 6 wins 17.9% from 169 runs which is below average — not ideal. An honest runner who could place again but lacks the raw pace to trouble Swift Mel, and the outside trap does not help.