Loading...
CORAL SPRINGTIME 285 MAIDEN SPRINT
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 2 | ▶ Burrows Titand 2y 16 | J J Heath — 21% R377 W81 P238 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 100 | - | 75 (3) | 46 (6) | 59 (4) | 88 (1) | 49 (5) | 70 (3) | 53 (5) | - | - | - | 76 | 85 | - | 85 | - | 29 | 3 | 3/10F | |
| 3 | ▶ Trinity Hoffad 3y 22 | A Kelly-pilgrim — 14% R206 W28 P90 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 0 | 19 | 68 (3) | 49 (4) | 63 (4) | 58 (5) | 44 (6) | 73 (3) | 64 (4) | 70 (4) | 48 (5) | 81 (1) | 69 | - | - | - | 64 | 66 | 1 | 18/1 | |
| 4 | ▶ Hypershockb 2y 13 | B S Green — 20% R420 W83 P246 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 100 | - | 32 (2) | 29 (3) | 30 (3) | 33 (1) | 30 (4) | 31 (4) | 33 (4) | 35 (3) | 30 (3) | 26 (5) | 27 | 43 | 30 | 43 | 44 | 42 | 2 | 5/2 | |
| 5 | ▶ Airlie Isabellab 2y 34 | A Herbert — 15% R67 W10 P35 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 0 | 81 | 37 (4) | 41 (4) | 37 (5) | 52 (2) | 37 (5) | 51 (1) | 48 (1) | 43 (2) | 32 (5) | 38 (4) | 16 | 28 | - | - | 42 | 35 | 4 | 12/1 | |
Burrows Titan is the pick, contingent on his P=0 being a data anomaly rather than a true reflection of form. His suitability profile is exceptional—track suitability (Tk=85), distance suitability (D=85), and trap suitability (Tp=76) average to 82.3 mean, the highest in this field by a significant margin. These are elite numbers suggesting he's built precisely for 285m sprints at Hove. His speed rating of 100 is field-leading and critical in a sprint distance where every fraction of a second compounds. His form line (P25, P22, P22, P24, P24) shows consistency around mid-placing, but a P=0 in the ML condition data is unusual and suspicious—it may reflect missing historical data or a misrecording. If his true performance profile is sound (consistent P24-P25 finishes suggest he's a reliable mid-tier performer), then his suitability advantage alone is substantial for a sprint. Trap 2 at 285m wins only 11.76% (weak condition), but his suitability and speed transcend structural disadvantage. The critical risk is the P=0 rating; if this represents true form collapse, he's overrated. However, his form line's consistency and the exceptional suitability profile suggest the P=0 is a data error. In a four-dog sprint where tactical control is paramount, his suitability and speed advantage are decisive.
Danger via speed advantage, but zero early pace and erratic form limit confidence. Could get outpaced early in a sprint and struggle to recover despite elite speed.
Danger as an early leader via bend/early pace. Will likely lead through the bend but lack the speed to hold on in the final 100m. Likely to fade to faster dogs.
Perimeter runner. Zero speed, erratic form, worst trap at this distance, poorest trainer record. Structurally disadvantaged across all dimensions.
Sprint distance at Hove 285m is a bend-speed dominated race. T6's historical dominance is severe (32.14%), but this race has no T6 runner. The absence of T6 and T1 creates a wide-open competitive landscape. Closers are structurally disadvantaged at sprints—early pace and bend execution matter far more than closing power. Raw speed (0-120 scale) is the dominant factor here.
T6 DOMINANT at 32.14% (56 wins from 174 runs). T3 DEAD at 2.27% (only 1 win from 44 runs). T2 weak at 11.76% (4 wins from 34 runs).
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 285m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.