Adopt a Greyhound @ Sheffield Retired Greyhounds
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ La Florb 4y 24 | D L Fretwell — 16% R162 W26 P102 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 49 | 100 | 32 (5) | 31 (2) | 30 (3) | 35 (3) | 26 (1) | 31 (5) | 30 (3) | 27 (3) | 28 (3) | - | 33 | 28 | 34 | 37 | 60 | 50 | 2 | 4/1 | |
| 3 | ▶ Lowgate Jackd 2y 37 | J E Hayton — 12% R25 W3 P11 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 51 | - | 74 (1) | 69 (2) | 37 (5) | 59 (2) | 33 (2) | 27 (5) | 40 (1) | 36 (1) | 26 (4) | 28 (2) | 54 | 54 | 45 | 52 | 60 | 58 | 1 | 3/1 | |
| 4 | ▶ Fiery Pad 4y 25 | S C Oxley — 18% R153 W27 P92 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 49 | - | 23 (4) | 29 (2) | 30 (3) | 30 (3) | 27 (3) | 28 (3) | 27 (4) | 37 (2) | 30 (3) | 25 (5) | 37 | 27 | 38 | 27 | 57 | 48 | 5 | 9/4F | |
| 5 | ▶ Mr Boombasticd 3y 8 | S C Oxley — 18% R153 W27 P92 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 48 | - | 28 (3) | 25 (4) | 36 (1) | 23 (5) | 29 (3) | 25 (4) | 26 (4) | 27 (2) | 24 (5) | 29 (4) | 28 | 41 | 28 | 36 | 56 | 49 | 4 | 3/1 | |
| 6 | ▶ Acomb Mob 3y 19 | K J Ferguson — 31% R51 W16 P40 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 49 | 0 | 31 (3) | 71 (1) | 68 (1) | 51 (3) | 61 (2) | 54 (3) | 55 (3) | 67 (1) | 28 (5) | 31 (4) | 26 | 39 | 24 | 32 | 60 | 50 | 3 | 5/2 | |
Multiple factors align for a Strong pick. T3 dominates at 29.3% from 157 runs at D3 280m — the best trap by 8 percentage points. Trainer at 38% is the highest in the field — a strong-tier signal that historically correlates with 43%+ win rates when they're the best trainer. AP 60 is joint field-best. Suitability scores are comfortably the highest in the field: trap 54, class 45, track 54, distance 52 — a well-matched specialist. C&D record of 10 runs, 3 wins (30%) — excellent proven form at this exact combo. Form shows some variability (58→58→62→49→75) but the most recent 75 is a standout performance showing peak ability. Speed 51 is joint field-best. No pace data available but the structural advantages are overwhelming.
DANGER: Field-best bend rating (100) in a sprint is a huge positive. Joint-best AP and improving form. But T1 at D3 280m doesn't carry the structural edge of T3, and the 10% CD conversion rate is a concern.
The T4 draw is reasonable but zero wins from 10 CD attempts tells the story. He runs competitively but doesn't convert at Sheffield 280m.
Strong trainer but the lowest AP and speed in the field. The combination doesn't support a win — class gap is too much despite trainer quality.
T3 dominates at 29.3% — best trap by 8 points. Lowgate Jack's 30% CD WR from T3 with 38% trainer is a powerful combination.
T1:18.3% T2:17.5% T3:29.3% T4:21.6% T5:21.1% T6:10.8%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 280m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.