| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Harlequin Manilab 3y 7 | K L Windebank — 17% R548 W92 P308 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 40 | 46 | 45 (4) | 41 (4) | 53 (3) | 45 (4) | 46 (4) | 51 (3) | 47 (3) | 35 (6) | 53 (3) | 63 (1) | 39 | 45 | - | 34 | 49 | 46 | 2 | 20/1 | |
| 2 | ▶ Giant Killerb 4y 24 | M P Brown — 21% R425 W89 P244 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 48 | 45 | 45 (4) | 34 (6) | 54 (2) | 13 (5) | 69 (5) | 63 (2) | 65 (2) | 48 (3) | 76 (4) | - | 37 | 25 | - | 24 | 53 | 44 | 4 | 11/8JF | |
| 3 | ▶ Swift Jordanab 3y 23 | J M Ray — 16% R249 W39 P146 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 52 | 57 | 47 (2) | 50 (2) | 15 (4) | 48 (4) | 57 (2) | 61 (3) | 57 (2) | 88 (1) | 59 (3) | 73 (4) | 43 | 30 | 23 | 30 | 61 | 52 | 1 | 8/1 | |
| 4 | ▶ Yellow Submarined 2y 15 | M P Brown — 21% R425 W89 P244 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 49 | 39 | 22 (6) | 24 (4) | 26 (5) | 25 (6) | 18 (4) | 16 (4) | 86 (3) | 58 (2) | 39 (6) | 44 (4) | 17 | 15 | - | 14 | 52 | 39 | 5 | 10/3 | |
| 5 | ▶ Unlikely Biscuitb 2y 16 | K L Windebank — 17% R548 W92 P308 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 57 | 58 | 27 (5) | 62 (6) | 42 (2) | 65 (5) | 59 (1) | 17 (1) | 50 (2) | 58 (2) | 46 (2) | - | 33 | 39 | 18 | 48 | 48 | 45 | 3 | 11/8JF | |
| 6 | ▶ Good Annab 2yN/R 16 | C R Morris — 28% R250 W71 P166 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 54 | 55 | 37 (4) | 39 (5) | 16 (3) | 46 (4) | 36 (5) | 58 (4) | 54 (3) | 42 (5) | 60 (1) | 42 (4) | 26 | 28 | - | 10 | 42 | 35 | - | - | |
Swift Jordana has the strongest competitive form profile in this field, with an average performance of 61 that stands well clear of her rivals. She's been running at A6 level at another venue, managing seconds with figures of 57 and 57 and a third with 61 — consistent mid-table A6 form that represents a significant quality edge in an IT contest. Won her trial here on Saturday confirming she handles the track. A confirmed closer with maximum closing speed, she's ideally suited to Yarmouth's galloping layout where late runners regularly overhaul the leaders. Her speed and bend ratings of 52 and 57 are strong for this field. The only concern is that she hasn't raced competitively at this venue before, but the trial win at least shows she's comfortable on the surface.
Best venue form in the field with proven graded ability — the main threat to the pick if she can establish a commanding early lead.
Good form elsewhere but a poor debut at Yarmouth raises questions — needs to prove he handles this track before he can be trusted.
One big performance to his name but nothing about his Yarmouth debut suggests he'll reproduce it here — poor suitability across the board.
Solid competitive form and the best speed figures in the field — place contender who'll fade late but could hang on for third.
Extreme closer from a top trainer but the form figures are too inconsistent and the suitability too low to be a genuine contender.
52 IT runs — negligible sample. Composite rank 1 at just 16.67% means the model's pick barely outperforms random selection. However, Swift Jordana's A6 competitive form is a cut above the rest of this field.
T1:0% T2:25% T3:0% T4:27.27% T5:11.11% T6:22.22%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 462m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Pace Profile
Avg early pace vs closing speed from last 5 runs
| Dog | Early | Close | Style |
|---|---|---|---|
1Harlequin Manila | 100 | 27 | Fader |
2Giant Killer | 100 | 45 | Front Runner |
3Swift Jordana | 0 | 100 | Closer |
4Yellow Submarine | 0 | 55 | Closer |
5Unlikely Biscuit | 100 | 19 | Fader |
6Good Anna | 0 | 100 | Closer |
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.