| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | Bet | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | ||||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Naphillb 4y 17 | E G Samuels — 16% R639 W102 P358 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 49 | 48 | 41 (5) | 67 (2) | 68 (2) | 55 (3) | 62 (2) | 44 (4) | 64 (6) | 60 (3) | 64 (3) | - | 43 | 53 | - | 27 | 64 | 56 | 4 | 5/1 | - | |
| 2 | ▶ Winniewinebottleb 3y 6 | I J Barnard — 23% R257 W60 P160 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 53 | 37 | 63 (3) | 64 (3) | 60 (3) | 64 (2) | 55 (4) | 54 (5) | 72 (2) | 51 (5) | 49 (5) | 63 (3) | 23 | 49 | - | 22 | 62 | 51 | 5 | 20/1 | - | |
| 3 | ▶ Champagne Zombieb 3y 24 | J M Ray — 16% R199 W32 P112 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 46 | 67 | 25 (5) | 22 (6) | 27 (4) | 35 (4) | 33 (5) | 35 (4) | 41 (1) | 24 (1) | 64 (4) | 64 (5) | 51 | 40 | - | - | 70 | 61 | 2 | 3/1 | - | |
| 4 | ▶ Essex Crazyd 2y 310 | M P Brown — 21% R403 W83 P230 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 45 | 52 | 79 (1) | 76 (1) | 60 (5) | 86 (1) | 63 (4) | 22 (1) | 85 (2) | 96 (1) | 37 (2) | 79 (2) | 6 | 18 | - | 18 | 71 | 51 | 6 | 9/4 | - | |
| 5 | ▶ Locationb 4y 35 | I J Barnard — 23% R257 W60 P160 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 57 | 40 | 19 (2) | 65 (6) | 68 (3) | 78 (1) | 65 (3) | 95 (1) | 52 (5) | 50 (5) | 54 (5) | 49 (6) | 45 | 53 | - | 27 | 63 | 56 | 3 | 12/1 | - | |
| 6 | ▶ Golden Acreb 3y 18 | M P Brown — 21% R403 W83 P230 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 50 | 55 | 80 (3) | 91 (1) | 86 (2) | 77 (6) | 72 (2) | 92 (3) | 87 (1) | 73 (1) | 16 (2) | - | 44 | 36 | - | - | 77 | 64 | 1 | 11/8F | - | |
Golden Acre is the model's pick on the strength of a high average performance of 77 — comfortably the best in the field. That figure is boosted by two sensational back-to-back wins at open race level posting 95 each time. His most recent runs have been a step down — 61 for third and 59 for fourth at open level — but even those moderate efforts are competitive for an IT field. He's a fader with extreme early pace which is ordinarily a concern at Yarmouth, but his quality advantage over this opposition is substantial enough that even with some late weakening he could hold the lead. Trainer M P Brown at 24% is steady. The distance suitability of 0 is the concern — his competitive wins have been at 388 metres and he's untried over 462 metres in a proper race. If he stays the trip, the class does the rest.
Proven at a much higher grade with solid venue form — the clear danger based on competitive experience that most rivals lack.
Capable closer with higher-grade experience but the three-week break and inconsistency make her hard to fully trust.
Outstanding bend speed but completely untried at this distance — a pace asset who may set up the race for others.
Explosive raw talent but completely wrong conditions — untried distance, extreme fade, and the weakest suitability profile in the race.
Capable closer with decent higher-grade form but entirely pace-dependent — needs the faders to weaken to have a chance.
Only 52 IT runs at Yarmouth 462m — far too small for meaningful analysis. Composite rank 1 wins at just 16.67% — virtually random. This is an unpredictable introductory field where form from other venues and distances is the best guide.
T1:0% T2:25% T3:0% T4:27.27% T5:11.11% T6:22.22%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 462m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Pace Profile
Avg early pace vs closing speed from last 5 runs
| Dog | Early | Close | Style |
|---|---|---|---|
1Naphill | 0 | 50 | All-Rounder |
2Winniewinebottle | 0 | 69 | Closer |
3Champagne Zombie | 100 | 50 | Front Runner |
4Essex Crazy | 100 | 0 | Fader |
5Location | 0 | 100 | Closer |
6Golden Acre | 100 | 7 | Fader |
Only runs at exactly 462m — no cross-distance comparisons. Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Each dog's average pace per 10m at every distance they've run. Green = fastest, red = slowest — shows where each dog is naturally strongest. Today's distance (462m) is highlighted.
| Dog | 220m | 277m | 388m | 400m | 462m | 659m | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Naphill | — | — | — | — | 0.620 | — |
| 2 | Winniewinebottle | — | — | — | — | 0.617 | — |
| 3 | Champagne Zombie | — | 0.606 | 0.625 | — | 0.619 | — |
| 4 | Essex Crazy | 0.630 | — | 0.614 | 0.614 | 0.615 | — |
| 5 | Location | — | — | — | — | 0.616 | 0.631 |
| 6 | Golden Acre | — | — | — | — | 0.610 | — |
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.