Loading...
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Our Jaked 2y 26 | D D Porter — 17% R527 W90 P288 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 49 | - | 34 (6) | 25 (2) | 36 (5) | 35 (1) | 18 (1) | 25 (5) | 22 (5) | 26 (5) | 31 (5) | - | 41 | 40 | 31 | 39 | 28 | 34 | 2 | 5/2 | |
| 2 | ▶ Hesdaguvnord 1y 21 | M P Brown — 21% R425 W89 P244 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 48 | - | 49 (4) | 45 (4) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 14 | 46 | - | 45 | - | 18 | 5 | 9/2 | |
| 3 | ▶ Burrow Hyundid 3y 14 | V A Lea — 15% R191 W29 P78 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 57 | - | 19 (6) | 23 (5) | 21 (6) | 28 (4) | 25 (6) | 33 (2) | 33 (2) | 31 (2) | 33 (2) | 24 (4) | 42 | 34 | 51 | 44 | 31 | 36 | 1 | 13/8F | |
| 4 | ▶ Greencroft Styleb 4y 25 | S J Rayner — 18% R182 W33 P104 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 48 | - | 21 (5) | 20 (6) | 28 (3) | 29 (3) | 36 (1) | 31 (1) | 31 (1) | 27 (2) | 27 (2) | 19 (4) | 37 | 34 | 14 | 43 | 29 | 34 | 3 | 16/1 | |
| 5 | ▶ Hitthelids Lillyb 3y 18 | N J Deas — 17% R454 W77 P249 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 47 | - | 36 (1) | 27 (4) | 30 (2) | 31 (2) | 28 (5) | 29 (5) | 32 (3) | 29 (3) | 25 (6) | 36 (1) | 56 | 38 | 54 | 34 | 30 | 36 | 4 | 4/1 | |
| 6 | ▶ Pullinamixerd 4y 15 | A Welch — 15% R318 W47 P161 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 51 | - | 33 (2) | 30 (2) | 29 (3) | 26 (3) | 30 (2) | 26 (2) | 23 (5) | 26 (5) | 33 (3) | 37 (1) | 29 | 24 | 23 | 20 | 28 | 26 | 6 | 5/1 | |
Takes the ratings pick by the narrowest of margins with an average performance of 30 and consistent recent form of 2-2-5-5-3. The suitability profile is the strongest in the race for this particular race — trap suitability of 56 stands out, and the track and distance scores of 38 and 34 are solid. Trainer Deas at 20% is competent. The significant concern is the draw: trap 5 is dead at 14.0% from 329 runs, and in a low-separation race where the model offers minimal predictive advantage, that structural headwind could be the difference between winning and losing. The ratings edge exists but it's wafer-thin, and the draw works against her.
Dominant draw with recent winning form in a race with no clear standout. Structural advantage could be the deciding factor.
Best speed in the field with ultra-consistent placing form. Ties the pick on ratings and has a better structural draw.
Lightly raced and hard to assess, but drawn in the best box with decent venue form. The unknown factor could cut either way.
Three wins from five starts shows a dog in terrific form at this level. Neutral draw and good suitability make him a live contender.
Dead draw, weak suitability, and modest recent form. Would need multiple rivals to underperform to have any chance.
LOW SEPARATION — R1 at 22.3% vs R3 at 17.9% (4.4pp gap). Inside traps dominate: T1 and T2 both above 23%. Outside traps T5 and T6 are dead. The pick is drawn in T5 — the structural headwind is significant. The danger should come from inside draws.
T1:23.0% T2:23.7% T3:20.2% T4:20.4% T5:14.0% T6:12.9%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 270m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.