Loading racecard
Loading racecard
The Bee Bop Classic
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Class | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Rating | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Hitthelids Stevod 5y 34 | N J Deas — 17% R456 W76 P249 Trainer form — last 3 months | 33 | 38 | 70 (3) | 96 (1) | 84 (2) | 74 (4) | 60 (4) | 60 (3) | 68 (2) | 79 (1) | 55 (5) | 76 (1) | 46 | 31 | 10 | 41 | 75 | 46 | 4 | 33/1 | ||
| 2 | ▶ Ballykilduff Gemb 2y 34 | C Condon — 9% R33 W3 P14 Trainer form — last 3 months | 43 | 34 | 66 (5) | 67 (5) | 66 (3) | 81 (1) | 57 (4) | 65 (4) | 32 (4) | 69 (3) | 82 (1) | 69 (6) | 46 | 41 | 18 | 18 | 67 | 37 | 3 | 2/1 | ||
| 3 | ▶ Ivy Hill Maisyb 2yN/R 36 | J M Liles — 19% R429 W82 P226 Trainer form — last 3 months | 37 | 25 | 78 (4) | 64 (5) | 67 (3) | 89 (2) | 96 (1) | 73 (4) | 93 (1) | 71 (5) | 93 (1) | 44 (4) | 40 | 42 | - | 59 | 75 | 48 | - | - | ||
| 4 | ▶ Fabulous Rakiyab 2y 15 | L G Tuffin — 25% R277 W68 P147 Trainer form — last 3 months | 100 | 100 | 68 (5) | 75 (3) | 67 (3) | 55 (5) | 80 (1) | 61 (2) | 56 (4) | 65 (4) | 54 (5) | 51 (5) | 65 | 32 | - | - | 63 | 51 | 1 | 4/1 | ||
| 6 | ▶ Essjay Soniab 2y 25 | F J Gray — 21% R350 W73 P188 Trainer form — last 3 months | 67 | 86 | 57 (5) | 89 (2) | 71 (3) | 84 (1) | 95 (2) | 99 (1) | 93 (2) | 87 (3) | 78 (2) | 65 (4) | 29 | 58 | 14 | 46 | 86 | 52 | 2 | 4/7F | ||
Sonia leads on composite score in this race and carries the best course suitability (58) and solid distance suitability (46) — both reflecting meaningful form at this track and distance. She finished 2nd at Towcester 712m OR last time out (43.40, P89), which is genuine S-grade experience at this exact trip. Her trajectory across the last six runs — P94→P100→P96→P84→P71→P89 — shows sustained high-level output over 500m and 712m at Towcester. The primary concern is T6 at 712m, which the limited ML data (30 runs) shows at just 16.7% — but given the negligible sample, the weight of course, distance, and form evidence outweighs the structural reservation. Tentative confidence given the tiny ML dataset and T6 structural questions, but the form credentials are the strongest in the field on balance.
Danger — S2 winner last time, best improving 712m trajectory, established stayers specialist
Interesting class angle but distance step is unproven — limited 712m suitability is a concern
Stayer with genuine distance suitability — C&D form exists but 942m regular dropping back to 712m
Best bend rating but zero 712m form — distance sphere change makes assessment unreliable
Only 30 runs in the dataset — all figures are statistically unreliable. Composite R1 at 46.1% sounds impressive but is based on 13 runs and could easily be a small-sample artefact. T6 at 16.7% from 6 runs is similarly unreliable. Course and distance form quality is far more important than ML signals at this sample size.
T1:66.7%(6r) T2:25.0%(4r) T3:25.0%(4r) T4:50.0%(4r) T5:0.0%(6r) T6:16.7%(6r)
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 712m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Pace Profile
Avg early pace vs closing speed from last 5 runs
| Dog | Early | Close | Style |
|---|---|---|---|
1Hitthelids Stevo | 70 | 1 | Fader |
2Ballykilduff Gem | 50 | 50 | All-Rounder |
3Ivy Hill Maisy | 0 | 100 | Closer |
4Fabulous Rakiya | 100 | 0 | Fader |
6Essjay Sonia | 0 | 100 | Closer |
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.