DANGER. Dominant on raw numbers — avgP 58 is 8+ points clear, Speed R1 at 59, and C&D place rate of 67% (1w/4p from 6r). The T1 rail draw provides ground-saving advantage through every bend. Peak of 67 from an A7 P1 confirms class. However, the critical weakness is Bend R5 — the worst in the field at a track where Bend R1 converts at 28.6%. The pattern of 1 win from 6 C&D runs despite 4 places is telling — she's always competitive but gets caught through the bends. This is exactly the profile the track data predicts: high speed establishes position, poor bending surrenders it through turns 2-4. Still dangerous because the raw class is so far ahead, but the structural mismatch is real.

Zero wins and zero places from 4 C&D runs eliminates her from serious contention. T2 is the worst draw at Harlow 415m (18.8% win rate). AvgP 48 and Speed R2 (57) show competence but 4 failed attempts at this exact configuration is a damning record. Recent A7 form of P3, P3 is consistently mid-pack. The combination of poor draw and zero C&D placings means the data doesn't support her here.

Zero wins from 5 C&D runs with just 1 place is a poor return for a dog with avgP 50 (Performance R2). Bend R3 is mid-field. Recent A7 form shows P2, P4, P4 — one good run amongst moderate efforts. The sole place from 5 attempts suggests the 415m trip at Harlow doesn't suit despite adequate overall ability. Cannot recommend ahead of dogs with proven C&D winning form.

Bend R2 (55) from a neutral T4 draw is a solid structural profile for this track. C&D form of 1w/1p from 5 runs proves she can win at this configuration. However, avgP 40 is the lowest in the field — a significant class gap. Peak of 65 from historical form shows she has run to a higher level, but recent performances have been lower. Speed R5 (42) means she won't establish early position through pace. The bend skill gives her a path to a place finish but winning requires the top dogs to underperform.