Barking Buzz App A5/A6 570
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Princess Mollyb 2y 23 | - | - | 0 | - | 58 (2) | 55 (4) | 52 (5) | 67 (1) | 49 (4) | 38 (6) | 68 (1) | 60 (2) | 57 (4) | 59 (2) | 34 | 29 | 7 | 39 | 56 | 22 | 5 | - | |
| 2 | ▶ Barrymore Herob 2y 34 | - | - | 0 | - | 20 (6) | 84 (1) | 53 (3) | 57 (2) | 62 (3) | 67 (1) | 66 (1) | 39 (6) | 52 (5) | 58 (3) | 55 | 28 | 37 | 26 | 54 | 16 | 6 | - | |
| 3 | ▶ Florida Majord 1y 1 | - | - | 100 | - | 55 (3) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 7 | - | - | - | 55 | 42 | 3 | - | |
| 4 | ▶ Kilkenny Ringod 3y 34 | - | - | 1 | - | 57 (4) | 61 (2) | 55 (4) | 61 (3) | 80 (1) | 78 (1) | 51 (6) | 63 (2) | 76 (3) | 57 (5) | 2 | 27 | 44 | 27 | 63 | 16 | 4 | - | |
| 5 | ▶ Virgil Tibbsd 1y 15 | Kim Taylor — 33% R3 W1 P2 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 100 | - | 70 (3) | 51 (4) | 62 (3) | 70 (1) | 51 (3) | 39 (6) | 54 (3) | - | - | - | 5 | 12 | - | - | 59 | 66 | 2 | - | |
| 6 | ▶ Cabra Kimb 2y 14 | - | - | 100 | - | 50 (4) | 59 (4) | 76 (1) | 73 (1) | 63 (3) | 62 (1) | 38 (5) | 67 (1) | 48 (2) | 43 (4) | - | 35 | 11 | - | 60 | 70 | 1 | - | |
Cabra Kim leads this field with a composite score of 70 — the highest by 4 points over Virgil Tibbs. She won an A6 at Thurles on 25 April from T2, demonstrating recent winning form at this course. Since the win she has collected 4th-place finishes in A5 company: 4th on 30 May (A5, T4) and 4th on 23 May (A5, T1) — competitive in a higher grade without winning. Track suitability of 35 is the highest in the field, indicating consistent Thurles performance. She ran from T2 to win in April, and today draws T6 — the T6 position at Thurles 570m shows 12.9% in the small sample, which is below average. However, at 570m the wide draw matters less as dogs have more time to settle into positions. Her speed rating of 100 is exceptional but this appears to be a data artefact similar to Florida Major (likely a maximum-scored rating with limited supporting runs), so it should be treated cautiously. The composite leadership and Thurles winning form are the primary justifications for selection.
Course-and-distance placing and highest distance suitability. Composite 22 trails Cabra Kim but 570m form gives her legitimacy.
Stamina proven over longer trips and direct 570m form at Thurles in April. Composite 16 is very low despite other positive factors.
Speed rating 100 is outstanding but data is very thin. One ungraded run at 525m — cannot reliably assess for a 570m graded contest.
Highest avgPerformance at 63 but composite only 16. T4 appears weakest at 570m. Contradiction in ratings makes him unreliable.
Composite 66 (second best), consistent A5 form, but distance extension to 570m is a question. Track suitability 12 is low.
570m sample at Thurles only 32 runs per trap — insufficient for reliable trap bias conclusions. Composite and form lead selection. Cabra Kim composite 70 is 4 points clear of the field.
T1:9.7%(31) T2:31.3%(32) T3:21.9%(32) T4:3.1%(32) T5:22.6%(31) T6:12.9%(31)
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 570m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Only runs at exactly 570m — no cross-distance comparisons. Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.