Loading...
Greyhounds Make Great Pets A7 525
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Hollyhill Hunterd 1y 5 | Paraic Campion — 14% R14 W2 P7 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 60 | - | 59 (4) | 46 (4) | 47 (4) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | 5 | - | - | 51 | 45 | 1 | - | |
| 2 | ▶ Cabra Kloyyd 4y 33 | - | - | 36 | - | 44 (4) | 46 (3) | 50 (4) | 36 (5) | 51 (2) | 31 (6) | 59 (4) | 43 (6) | 37 (6) | 42 (5) | 28 | 22 | 21 | 11 | 44 | 27 | 6 | - | |
| 3 | ▶ Enchanted Divab 1y 15 | Kim Taylor — 33% R3 W1 P2 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 55 | - | 44 (5) | 59 (3) | 47 (5) | 47 (5) | 63 (2) | 60 (3) | 70 (1) | 38 (4) | - | - | - | 22 | 16 | 13 | 53 | 43 | 2 | - | |
| 4 | ▶ Grandads Gangd 1y 6 | - | - | 43 | - | 49 (3) | 36 (4) | 49 (2) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | 14 | 12 | 13 | 45 | 36 | 4 | - | |
| 5 | ▶ Bull Run Nuggetb 2y 6 | - | - | 38 | - | 54 (4) | 40 (5) | 33 (5) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 43 | 31 | 5 | - | |
| 6 | ▶ Bogger Rebeccab 3y 14 | - | - | 53 | - | 42 (5) | 48 (5) | 59 (2) | 69 (1) | 52 (4) | 63 (3) | 63 (3) | 60 (3) | 78 (1) | 60 (4) | 1 | 30 | 36 | 25 | 56 | 43 | 3 | - | |
Hollyhill Hunter leads on composite score at 45 and draws T1, the second-best historical position at Thurles 525m (18.1%, 386 runs). His speed rating of 60 is among the highest in this field, and his avgPerformance of 51 is respectable for A7 company. His three most recent runs are all 4th-place finishes in A6 company — a higher grade than today's A7 — which represents a class drop that should improve his finishing position. Consistent mid-field running in harder company often translates to front-end performances when stepping down. Track suitability of 5 is low, suggesting limited Thurles experience, but the performance ratings and composite edge justify the selection. The condWeighted and consensus models are split, but the ratings-forward models (h3FullHybrid, perfHeavy) both point to Hollyhill Hunter. At 525m with low trap separation, the best composite at an inside draw is the strongest statistical case available in this compressed field.
Composite 43 vs 45 for the pick — very close contest. Class drop and T3 draw make her the main danger.
Best draw position but ratings (avgPerf 44, speed 36, composite 27) lag behind the leaders.
Regular A7 runner, recent 2nd and 3rd at this level, but composite 36 lags behind the leaders.
Three consecutive 4th and 5th finishes. Lowest ratings. Weakest draw. Very unlikely to win.
Highest avgPerformance but two recent 5th finishes in A6. T6 draw and composite 43 trail the pick.
Thurles 525m low separation. Top three composites within 2 points of each other. Draw quality and race pace intelligence become the key differentiators in this compressed field.
T1:18.1% T2:18.7% T3:16.0% T4:17.3% T5:14.2% T6:16.1%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 525m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Only runs at exactly 525m — no cross-distance comparisons. Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.