Loading...
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Crokers Sistab 4y 15 | A N J Morgan — 14% R1165 W168 P574 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 53 | 40 | 19 (3) | 20 (4) | 15 (5) | 21 (2) | 20 (2) | 46 (3) | 23 (3) | 19 (5) | 27 (1) | 19 (3) | 18 | 23 | 20 | 23 | 26 | 24 | 5 | 7/1 | |
| 2 | ▶ Tickets Hollyb 4y 25 | A N J Morgan — 14% R1165 W168 P574 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 51 | 51 | 21 (4) | 43 (3) | 28 (6) | 50 (6) | 23 (5) | 38 (3) | 30 (5) | 20 (1) | 25 (4) | - | 25 | 28 | 31 | 31 | 28 | 28 | 1 | 3/1 | |
| 3 | ▶ Slid Johnd 4y 43 | A N J Morgan — 14% R1165 W168 P574 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 54 | 45 | 56 (2) | 44 (3) | 55 (3) | 43 (4) | 20 (3) | 19 (5) | 24 (3) | 47 (4) | 49 (3) | 54 (2) | 52 | 55 | 48 | 48 | 35 | 43 | 3 | 11/4 | |
| 4 | ▶ Imgoodiamd 3y 36 | J A Danahar — 18% R312 W55 P177 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 52 | 53 | 50 (3) | 52 (4) | 56 (2) | 55 (3) | 71 (1) | 25 (6) | 32 (5) | 23 (2) | 18 (4) | 23 (5) | 21 | 22 | 30 | 25 | 28 | 25 | 4 | 6/4F | |
| 5 | ▶ Home Colleenb 3y 6 | A N J Morgan — 14% R1165 W168 P574 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 41 | - | 15 (4) | 24 (2) | 19 (2) | 16 (5) | 15 (4) | 23 (2) | 18 (5) | 18 (4) | 18 (5) | 23 (4) | 17 | 29 | 32 | 31 | 20 | 22 | 6 | 10/1 | |
| 6 | ▶ Knockmant Zeeb 3y 17 | A N J Morgan — 14% R1165 W168 P574 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 32 | 52 | 31 (1) | 22 (3) | 27 (1) | 38 (4) | 19 (3) | 23 (1) | 17 (4) | 35 (4) | 22 (4) | 16 (5) | 9 | 23 | 14 | 24 | 33 | 25 | 2 | 11/4 | |
An All-Rounder with the best-balanced pace profile among the serious contenders: early pace of 50 and bend rating of 51, placing her clearly ahead of Crokers Sista on pace and only marginally behind Imgoodiam who is drawn in the worst trap. Her speed rating of 51 is solid and her average performance of 27.5 is moderate. Course and distance record of 8 runs with 1 win gives reasonable track familiarity. Recent form of 3rd, 5th, 1st, 4th, 2nd shows a win at D5 and a 2nd-place finish, confirming she can compete at this level. Her performance figures of 23, 38, 30, 20, 25 peak at 38 from an A5 race showing ability above her current grade.
DANGER — best trap (27.04%), best performance (37.4), decent pace metrics. The dominant trap makes him dangerous despite the lowest speed rating. If his pace gets him to the bend first from T6, the speed deficiency may not matter over 260 metres.
Strong course form but the lowest pace metrics in the field make it hard to support at a sprint where first to the bend wins.
Strong course form (40% from 5 runs) but the Closer profile is an absolute bar at Valley 260 metres. Must be opposed.
Best pace metrics but drawn in the worst trap (13.47%). Even the best early pace can't fully overcome the structural disadvantage at Valley 260m.
Low speed, low performance, no pace data, and a poor trap. Very unlikely to feature.
T6 dominates at 27.04% from 1,398 runs. No runner combines the ideal pace profile with the best trap draw.
T1:15.33% T2:14.09% T3:16.12% T4:13.47% T5:13.96% T6:27.04%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 260m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.