The Future Of Racing: PGR TV Stakes
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Vale Bluebellb 3y 23 | J Llewellin — 17% R365 W61 P195 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 53 | 18 | 76 (1) | 38 (6) | 48 (5) | 51 (6) | 52 (6) | 66 (4) | 57 (6) | 58 (6) | 53 (5) | 74 (3) | 45 | 43 | 25 | 22 | 51 | 46 | 4 | 9/2 | |
| 2 | ▶ Mohican Miab 2y 27 | D T Smith — 16% R403 W64 P196 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 41 | 51 | 61 (3) | 40 (6) | 45 (5) | 62 (2) | 62 (4) | 71 (1) | 51 (5) | 22 (1) | 18 (3) | 19 (2) | 33 | 29 | - | 39 | 33 | 33 | 5 | 8/1 | |
| 3 | ▶ Michelle My Bellb 1y 24 | F Macklin — 20% R205 W42 P105 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 48 | 64 | 52 (5) | 66 (3) | 48 (5) | 100 (1) | 92 (1) | 79 (1) | 32 (6) | 52 (5) | 80 (3) | 70 (1) | 38 | 29 | - | 44 | 62 | 53 | 2 | 15/8F | |
| 4 | ▶ Bombay Tildab 2y 4 | D T Smith — 16% R403 W64 P196 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 37 | 33 | 46 (5) | 15 (3) | 20 (2) | 14 (5) | 55 (6) | 13 (6) | 62 (3) | 48 (5) | 63 (3) | 80 (1) | 28 | 1 | 20 | 11 | 33 | 26 | 6 | 6/1 | |
| 5 | ▶ Swift Namelessd 2y 7 | M T Munslow — 23% R148 W34 P93 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 54 | 56 | 60 (3) | 69 (2) | 66 (2) | 59 (3) | 48 (6) | 62 (3) | 72 (2) | 75 (2) | 59 (4) | 52 (5) | 48 | 44 | 31 | 40 | 67 | 59 | 1 | 9/4 | |
| 6 | ▶ Asland 5y 35 | J Llewellin — 17% R365 W61 P195 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 57 | 49 | 37 (6) | 74 (2) | 62 (4) | 57 (6) | 65 (4) | 75 (3) | 78 (2) | 59 (1) | 74 (3) | - | 12 | 34 | 31 | 36 | 68 | 54 | 3 | 9/2 | |
Swift Nameless is the classiest dog in this field by a clear margin. An average performance of 67 puts him head and shoulders above his rivals, and he's produced consistent figures at this exact course, distance and grade — second last time with a 72, second the time before with a 75, and a win back in early March with an 83. The concern is his pace profile: he shows decent early speed but tends to weaken through the closing stages, which at Nottingham's tight 500 metres means he needs to be far enough clear through the first two bends. His speed rating of 54 is the best in the field, and the trap draw at 5 is neutral rather than unfavourable. The class edge here is substantial enough that even allowing for an imperfect draw, he should have too much quality for these rivals.
Best bend ability in the field from a favoured trap — the chief threat to the selection if she turns up.
Course form is too patchy and the class gap to the principals is significant — place chance at best.
Significant class rise and a tendency to weaken late — unlikely to feature in the finish.
Dominant trap position is irrelevant given the huge class gap — others much preferred.
Has the quality but drawn widest with poor trap suitability — needs things to fall right and may find the pick too strong.
Low separation race — R1 wins just 20.0% vs R3 at 15.3%. T4 is the best-performing box from 346 runs. Speed rank is the strongest predictor here with R1 at 21.7%. Bend rank shows no clear pattern.
T1:15.8% T2:18.2% T3:20.3% T4:22.0% T5:16.1% T6:19.1%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 500m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Pace Profile
Avg early pace vs closing speed from last 5 runs
| Dog | Early | Close | Style |
|---|---|---|---|
1Vale Bluebell | 0 | 100 | Closer |
2Mohican Mia | 100 | 0 | Fader |
3Michelle My Bell | 72 | 100 | All-Rounder |
4Bombay Tilda | 10 | 0 | Fader |
5Swift Nameless | 61 | 21 | Fader |
6Aslan | 39 | 79 | Closer |
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.