| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Westfield Wispab 4y 15 | J S Atkins — 14% R296 W41 P157 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 55 | 65 | 38 (1) | 24 (5) | 30 (3) | 30 (4) | 37 (1) | 25 (4) | 27 (5) | 73 (4) | 69 (3) | 54 (3) | 53 | 68 | 37 | 50 | 60 | 59 | 1 | 5/1 | |
| 2 | ▶ Rackethall Pennyb 2y 28 | I Zivkovic — 13% R613 W82 P289 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 43 | 49 | 29 (5) | 80 (1) | 51 (5) | 76 (1) | 41 (1) | 51 (5) | 61 (2) | 48 (5) | 52 (4) | 66 (3) | 27 | 44 | - | 9 | 55 | 43 | 4 | 6/1 | |
| 3 | ▶ Grumpy Florenceb 3y 4 | N Langley — 16% R211 W34 P117 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 51 | 41 | 29 | 35 (5) | 35 (2) | 29 (3) | 24 (4) | 42 (6) | 38 (1) | 22 (1) | 18 (5) | - | 56 | 41 | 27 | 38 | 33 | 40 | 3 | 11/4 | |
| 4 | ▶ How Are Neverd 2y 18 | J G Hurst — 18% R274 W49 P154 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 53 | - | 30 (2) | 29 (3) | 21 (6) | 30 (2) | 33 (3) | 25 (6) | 30 (4) | 38 (1) | 24 (5) | 31 (3) | 37 | 29 | - | 36 | 29 | 31 | 6 | 7/2 | |
| 5 | ▶ Grantstown Roadd 2y 37 | T D Coote — 19% R578 W111 P295 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 54 | 56 | 63 (3) | 51 (5) | 58 (3) | 80 (1) | 65 (3) | 42 (6) | 62 (4) | 70 (2) | 81 (1) | 35 (6) | 24 | 57 | - | - | 64 | 52 | 2 | 15/8F | |
| 6 | ▶ Rhoden Esmaeb 3y 11 | J S Atkins — 14% R296 W41 P157 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 45 | - | 20 (5) | 25 (4) | 18 (6) | 26 (4) | 27 (4) | 39 (2) | 42 (1) | 32 (3) | 68 (4) | 98 (1) | 63 | 56 | 45 | 58 | 45 | 52 | 5 | 7/1 | |
Strong historical ability with best speed rating in the field. Excellent track suit of sixty-eight suggests genuine advantage at this venue. However dog is returning from trials with recent competitive runs showing seventy-three and sixty-nine. Best speed and quality track suitability offer genuine edge despite trial returns.
Recently racing at 462 metres in A4 grade and now dropping down to 268m sprint. Distance suitability is terrible at only nine. Closer pace profile is normally poor at sprint distance suggesting no advantage from recent A4 experience. Poor distance suit score suggests vulnerability here.
Consistent regular at these conditions with recent form at course and distance. Excellent track suitability of forty-one shows genuine advantage at this venue. Performance rating is modest but consistency suggests fair record. Reliable rather than exciting.
Won last time out at D3 stepping up to D2. Excellent speed rating in the field suggests genuine pace ability. However performance rating is modest at twenty-nine suggesting limited overall ability. Recent win is good but upgrading in grade and modest historical ability suggests limited chance.
Very talented dog with strong recent form normally at 462 metres in A4 grade. Distance suitability is zero at 268m suggesting major structural disadvantage in sprint. Racing from dead trap five which is worst statistically at these conditions. Exceptional talent fights against double negative of distance move and trap position.
Trial runs only with two wins at T1 and one at T3. Great suitability scores across all dimensions suggest potential. Newcomer to competitive racing makes form assessment difficult. Trap six disadvantage at sprint distance offsets excellent suitability scores. Potential but unproven.
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 268m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.