Loading...
Intertrack Vs Dunstall Park
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Droppys Typicald 1y 23 | F Macklin — 20% R205 W42 P105 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 47 | 34 | 45 (6) | 63 (5) | 59 0 | 64 (3) | 84 (4) | 78 (1) | 64 (1) | - | - | - | 54 | 80 | - | 50 | 72 | 68 | 4 | 9/4 | |
| 2 | ▶ We Dont Knowd 2y 13 | D T Smith — 16% R403 W64 P196 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 42 | 40 | 61 (4) | 44 (5) | 63 (3) | 38 (6) | 67 (3) | 17 (4) | 22 (1) | 82 (1) | 64 (3) | 14 (5) | 44 | 23 | 23 | 23 | 46 | 40 | 6 | 5/1 | |
| 3 | ▶ Ballintemple Genb 2y 35 | J R Hall — 21% R330 W69 P186 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 100 | 100 | 51 (4) | 55 (5) | 51 (5) | 54 (5) | 48 (6) | 59 (4) | 69 (4) | 59 (6) | 74 (2) | 83 (1) | 51 | 30 | - | - | 66 | 57 | 1 | 13/8F | |
| 4 | ▶ Lovelandb 2y 26 | R Short — 18% R132 W24 P61 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 100 | 100 | 56 (4) | 80 (1) | 42 (6) | 55 (5) | 72 (2) | 68 (2) | 61 (4) | 52 (5) | 51 (6) | 85 (1) | 37 | 15 | - | - | 64 | 51 | 2 | 6/1 | |
| 5 | ▶ Pimlico Princessb 2y 5 | J Gray — 14% R224 W31 P127 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 44 | 60 | 46 (4) | 46 (2) | 74 (1) | 68 (2) | - | - | - | - | - | - | 59 | 86 | - | 51 | 68 | 67 | 3 | 5/1 | |
| 6 | ▶ Kind Ciand 5y 24 | J Llewellin — 17% R365 W61 P195 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 51 | 31 | 58 (5) | 60 (4) | 64 (4) | 53 (5) | 80 (1) | 55 (4) | 78 (2) | 72 (3) | 65 (5) | 81 (1) | 33 | 49 | - | 29 | 67 | 57 | 5 | 8/1 | |
Ballintemple Gen is a fascinating newcomer to Nottingham with his competitive form earned at Dunstall Park in A1 company — a 69 in fourth and a 58 in sixth represents genuine quality at the highest grade level. The projection rates him top here on the basis of outstanding speed and bend ratings, but he's a fader who has never raced at this specific course and distance, and his trial form here has been modest. Drawn in trap 3, which historically is the worst box in IT grade at this distance at just 6.7%, the structure isn't in his favour. This is a speculative selection based on raw ability rather than proven form at this venue. He has the class to win but needs to adapt quickly to unfamiliar surroundings.
Best competitive form and outstanding course knowledge — the most likely winner if you trust proven form over raw potential.
Unknown quantity on competitive form — trial figures are unreliable and the step up could expose her.
Consistent Dunstall A2 form but untested at Nottingham — respect for the ability but course knowledge is lacking.
Exceptional course knowledge and decent closing ability but too few competitive runs to assess properly.
Proven graded form at a decent level but the widest draw in a trial with unknown quantities is unappealing.
Small samples throughout but inside traps strongly favoured. T3 at just 6.7% is notably weak despite being dominant in graded races. Trial races often produce different patterns to competitive action.
T1:24.2% T2:28.1% T3:6.7% T4:21.9% T5:13.9% T6:10.8%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 500m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Pace Profile
Avg early pace vs closing speed from last 5 runs
| Dog | Early | Close | Style |
|---|---|---|---|
1Droppys Typical | 0 | 100 | Closer |
2We Dont Know | 100 | 0 | Fader |
3Ballintemple Gen | 100 | 0 | Fader |
4Loveland | 100 | 0 | Fader |
5Pimlico Princess | 0 | 100 | Closer |
6Kind Cian | 0 | 100 | Closer |
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.