Loading racecard
Loading racecard
Watch PGR On greyhounds.attheraces.com Stakes
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Emers Summerb 2y 19 | F Macklin — 20% R205 W42 P105 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 50 | 66 | 47 (1) | 47 (1) | 56 (5) | 79 (3) | 25 (5) | 82 (3) | 44 (6) | 86 (2) | 74 (3) | 95 (1) | 49 | 15 | - | 16 | 76 | 59 | 1 | 7/2 | |
| 2 | ▶ Time Countsd 5y 14 | J Llewellin — 17% R372 W62 P197 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 52 | - | 32 (2) | 41 (1) | 31 (4) | 29 (4) | 39 (2) | 42 (2) | 39 (3) | 40 (3) | 98 (1) | 94 (2) | 57 | 45 | 43 | 44 | 49 | 49 | 5 | 9/2 | |
| 3 | ▶ Nunos Nuggetd 2y 17 | L Cook — 19% R135 W25 P77 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 55 | - | 31 (6) | 76 (4) | 34 (4) | 39 (2) | 76 (3) | 74 (4) | 47 (1) | 60 (5) | 100 (1) | 52 (6) | 89 | 68 | 53 | 44 | 63 | 64 | 2 | 11/10F | |
| 4 | ▶ Fancroftmawbakerb 2y 9 | K Wilton — 23% R179 W42 P95 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 48 | 20 | 97 (1) | 41 (1) | 46 (4) | 47 (5) | 35 (2) | 34 (3) | 40 (1) | 75 (4) | 81 (2) | 41 (1) | 65 | 53 | - | 62 | 58 | 59 | 4 | 6/1 | |
| 5 | ▶ Mohican Baled 1y 16 | D T Smith — 16% R410 W66 P203 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 44 | 100 | 41 (1) | 37 (1) | 23 (5) | 32 (3) | 30 (2) | 24 (1) | 24 (1) | 18 (2) | 19 (6) | 28 (3) | 22 | 51 | - | 62 | 25 | 32 | 6 | 16/1 | |
| 6 | ▶ Leeladd 2y 5 | J Llewellin — 17% R372 W62 P197 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 48 | 20 | 69 (4) | 33 (5) | 38 (3) | 77 (3) | 55 (5) | 28 (6) | 54 (4) | 69 (4) | 67 (2) | 46 (1) | 63 | 67 | 61 | 58 | 63 | 63 | 3 | 4/1 | |
Emers Summer has the highest average performance in the field at 76, backed up by strong open-race form — an 83 third, an 86 second, and a 96 first in her last four competitive outings at various sprint distances. She's clearly a class above D1 level on ability. The concern is her last run was just a trial at 305 metres producing a 19, and before that she ran at different courses and distances. Her Nottingham sprint form is limited, with track suitability of just 15 and distance suitability of 16. But the raw class advantage is significant — she's averaging 76 in open company while most of these are averaging 25-63 in low grades. If she adapts to the sprint distance here, the ability gap should prove decisive. Macklin's 28% is the best trainer rate in the field.
Exceptional trap suitability and open-race form — the chief threat with course knowledge the pick lacks.
Reliable at D1 level but a class below the stronger runners — should place but winning looks tough.
Improving but inconsistent — has the course knowledge but not the class to trouble the top two.
Well below the required standard — trial form is no guide to D1 competitiveness.
Strong course knowledge and historical form but the recent regression makes him hard to support with confidence.
Only 59 total runs in this condition — all trap percentages are unreliable. Composite R1 wins 31.8% from 22 runs, suggesting the best dog usually wins, but sample is tiny. Sprint distance at Nottingham — treat as pace-and-form assessment.
T1:23.1% T2:30.0% T3:40.0% T4:12.5% T5:7.7% T6:40.0%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 305m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.