Suffolk Down Vs Yarmouth Intertrack
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Aurelia Geegeeb 2y 7 | M P Brown — 21% R425 W89 P244 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 56 | 45 | 31 (6) | 41 (2) | 34 (5) | 33 (5) | 57 (1) | 43 (4) | 43 (3) | 16 (3) | 63 (1) | 47 (2) | 44 | 18 | - | 18 | 41 | 36 | 3 | 7/4 | |
| 3 | ▶ Bump Cornerb 1y 15 | V K Thom — 20% R138 W28 P89 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 31 | 48 | 22 (6) | 30 (4) | 28 (4) | 43 (2) | 29 (5) | 33 (5) | 48 (4) | 38 (3) | 25 (4) | 23 (5) | 25 | 25 | - | 5 | 30 | 26 | 5 | 25/1 | |
| 4 | ▶ Epping Eva Adieub 1y 15 | J G Mullins — 18% R125 W23 P75 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 52 | 39 | 34 (4) | 13 (4) | 34 (4) | 39 (4) | 29 (5) | - | - | - | - | - | 37 | 67 | - | 24 | 34 | 37 | 2 | 7/1 | |
| 5 | ▶ Rathcoole Nutzd 5y 26 | I J Barnard — 23% R262 W59 P162 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 52 | 60 | 26 (5) | 28 (6) | 50 (1) | 15 (3) | 34 (4) | 23 (6) | 52 (1) | 38 (3) | 71 (1) | 28 (4) | 17 | 36 | - | 17 | 34 | 30 | 4 | 8/1 | |
| 6 | ▶ Savana Maceyb 4y 26 | M P Brown — 21% R425 W89 P244 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 53 | 62 | 45 (4) | 43 (6) | 53 (4) | 38 (5) | 68 (1) | 44 (5) | 69 (4) | 62 (3) | 61 (4) | 56 (4) | 36 | 18 | - | 18 | 65 | 51 | 1 | 4/6F | |
Savana Macey stands apart in this introductory trial by virtue of her class credentials alone — she has raced at Open Race level against the very best dogs in the country, running at 548 metres over a much higher class spectrum than anything in this field. That experience and pedigree cannot be ignored. Drawing in trap 6 is neutral for a trial of this nature. Her closing speed rating of 100 indicates she's a finisher, which should help her in Yarmouth's stretch run. However, her form subsequent to that Open Race experience has been patchy, with a win at A3 over a shorter distance followed by variable results. Her track suitability of 18 and distance suitability of 18 are both poor, suggesting Yarmouth 462m is not ideal for her profile. Her recent form line shows inconsistency — she's capable of very good performances but hasn't shown consistency in lower grades. This is a massive class drop into an introductory trial, and while her credentials make her the pick, the speculative nature of a trial race with such thin form guidance means this cannot be rated as a confident prediction.
Speculative Early Pace Threat — Speed credentials exist but profile poorly suited to track characteristics
Unlikely to Compete — Weak form profile and no previous victories at any grade
Could Finish Well But Lacks Winning Form — Competent closer but recent record doesn't suggest victory
Speculative Early Pace Without Obvious Finish — Could lead but unlikely to hold on
Introductory Trial with minimal historical precedent at these exact conditions. Form guidance is speculative. Class, pedigree, stable reputation, and trial work will matter more than statistical patterns. Treat as near-random with heavy bias toward quality credentials and stable form.
Unreliable sample size — treat trap bias data as near-random
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 462m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Pace Profile
Avg early pace vs closing speed from last 5 runs
| Dog | Early | Close | Style |
|---|---|---|---|
1Aurelia Geegee | 100 | 0 | Fader |
3Bump Corner | 50 | 50 | All-Rounder |
4Epping Eva Adieu | 47 | 77 | Closer |
5Rathcoole Nutz | 64 | 46 | Front Runner |
6Savana Macey | 30 | 100 | Closer |
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.