| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Grouchos Gailb 2yN/R 14 | D Calvert — 17% R545 W93 P315 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 43 | - | 29 (2) | 21 (4) | 24 (3) | 26 (2) | 21 (5) | 30 (1) | 26 (2) | 22 (3) | 25 (2) | 18 (5) | 28 | 21 | - | 32 | 25 | 26 | - | - | |
| 2 | ▶ Cockneychampagneb 2y 36 | S J L Lapidge — 18% R320 W56 P187 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 49 | 60 | 33 (4) | 31 (5) | 35 (5) | 48 (2) | 41 (3) | 49 (6) | 21 (2) | 31 (5) | 24 (2) | - | 36 | 41 | 37 | 30 | 27 | 30 | 2 | 10/3 | |
| 3 | ▶ Get Away Sadieb 2y 7 | S Watson — 31% R414 W128 P292 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 52 | - | 30 (3) | 27 (5) | 28 (3) | 23 (4) | 36 (1) | 27 (3) | 28 (5) | 29 (3) | 33 (2) | 18 (5) | 44 | 32 | 17 | 33 | 27 | 30 | 4 | 6/5F | |
| 4 | ▶ Miss Mini Lulub 4y 14 | C A Williams — 15% R362 W53 P183 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 53 | 47 | 27 (4) | 33 (2) | 23 (5) | 23 (5) | 36 (1) | 35 (1) | 22 (5) | 22 (5) | 29 (4) | 25 (4) | 59 | 41 | 15 | 28 | 28 | 33 | 1 | 11/2 | |
| 5 | ▶ Gizmo Jeckelb 3y 25 | C A Williams — 15% R362 W53 P183 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 51 | - | 34 (5) | 53 (5) | 49 (2) | 28 (5) | 27 (4) | 26 (4) | 32 (1) | 28 (2) | 25 (5) | 26 (4) | 17 | 35 | 12 | 33 | 27 | 27 | 5 | 8/1 | |
| 6 | ▶ Glideaway Falcond 3y 8 | S A Birks — 16% R217 W35 P124 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 54 | 30 | 42 (1) | 41 (1) | 29 (5) | 38 (1) | 31 (3) | 32 (2) | 33 (2) | 29 (3) | 28 (2) | 48 (3) | 30 | 32 | 18 | 40 | 44 | 41 | 3 | 2/1 | |
Glideaway Falcon stands out on class. His average performance across all runs is the highest in this field by a significant margin, boosted by competitive efforts at B3 level over 450 metres — two grades and a different distance above this company. He placed second last time at D3 despite missing the break, which shows his raw ability can compensate even when things go wrong. His earlier trial win from this box was comfortable. The key question is whether the missed break was a one-off or a recurring issue — if he traps cleanly, his superior quality should tell over this sprint. Trainer Birks has a modest win rate at 10% but the dog's individual merit outweighs that concern.
Drawn in the best position on the card for this grade and distance — the structural advantage alone makes her a genuine danger despite modest ability.
Strong draw but recent form disappointing — needs to bounce back from that fifth to be competitive.
Consistent and well trained but needs luck from a neutral draw — likely to be involved in the places without winning.
Out of form and finding trouble — would need a significant turnaround to be competitive here.
Has pace but stepping up in class and drawn in the weakest position — the draw undermines his best asset.
Low separation (2.2pp gap R1 vs R3). T1 is the dominant position — well above expected. Inside draws are strongly favoured at D3 275m.
T1:27.6% T2:23.8% T3:18.8% T4:20.7% T5:17.8% T6:20.8%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 275m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.