The future of racing: PGR TV
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Abbodabbo Emmab 5y 18 | L B Pearce — 14% R164 W23 P81 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 61 | 52 | 68 (1) | 49 (4) | 65 (1) | 68 (1) | 58 (2) | 36 (5) | 57 (2) | 40 (4) | 51 (2) | 35 (6) | 40 | 43 | 42 | 39 | 47 | 44 | 2 | 7/2 | |
| 2 | ▶ Montana Faithfulb 1y 13 | T M Levers — 17% R114 W19 P65 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 49 | 34 | 41 (5) | 47 (4) | 47 (5) | 48 (3) | 70 (1) | 45 (3) | 32 (6) | 69 (1) | 17 (6) | - | 42 | 46 | - | 37 | 40 | 41 | 3 | 7/4 | |
| 3 | ▶ Hollyhill Patsyd 2y 16 | M Mavrias — 18% R345 W63 P181 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 67 | 66 | 35 (5) | 36 (6) | 39 (4) | 51 (3) | 57 (2) | 60 (1) | 52 (2) | 50 (2) | 30 (1) | 29 (1) | 55 | 49 | 18 | 40 | 31 | 40 | 1 | 1/1F | |
| 4 | ▶ Marcias Blue Boyd 5y 25 | S Mavrias — 17% R242 W42 P134 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 39 | 58 | 48 (2) | 39 (5) | 31 (6) | 46 (5) | 43 (4) | 50 (3) | 49 (3) | 24 (6) | 16 (5) | 23 (4) | 31 | 28 | 25 | 23 | 40 | 35 | 5 | 50/1 | |
| 5 | ▶ Beach Partyb 3y 16 | T M Levers — 17% R114 W19 P65 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 53 | 48 | 39 (5) | 35 (6) | 43 (4) | 51 (3) | 55 (3) | 52 (2) | 41 (4) | 61 (1) | 49 (4) | 17 (4) | 14 | 28 | 8 | 11 | 32 | 26 | 4 | 12/1 | |
| 6 | ▶ Montana Ladyb 1y 3 | T M Levers — 17% R114 W19 P65 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 48 | 26 | 48 (4) | 50 (4) | 69 (1) | 44 (3) | 48 (3) | 69 (1) | 39 (5) | 14 (6) | - | - | 28 | 28 | - | 25 | 28 | 28 | 6 | 10/1 | |
Hollyhill Patsy has been the form dog at this course in recent weeks, winning twice and finishing second once in her last three starts. Her average performance figure of 31 looks modest, but that number undersells her — it's the speed and bend figures that tell the true story. She has the highest speed and bend ratings in the field by a comfortable margin, and her early pace is exceptional. She's a confirmed front-runner who gets to the lead quickly and uses that positional advantage through Central Park's decisive first bend. The front-running style is perfectly suited to a track where 44% of winners lead all the way. Trap 3 is near the expected rate and her trap suitability of 55 is excellent. Trained by M Mavrias at 10% which is below average, but the dog is clearly in top form and well suited.
Highest raw performance and confirmed early pace from the rail — the main danger to the pick.
Recent course and distance winner but wildly inconsistent and wrong pace profile for this track.
Returning from a break with below-par suitability — needs to find his best form to feature here.
Sprint winner trying 491m for effectively the first time — wrong trip, wrong pace profile.
Worst bend rating and weakest suitability in the field — the course and distance win looks a one-off.
Smaller sample size of 351 runs means trap data is less reliable. T5 looks dominant at 25% but from only 56 runs. Speed rank 1 wins 22.4% — pace is a strong predictor at this level. Composite R1 at 20.7% provides decent separation.
T1:16.7% T2:18.8% T3:15.1% T4:13.6% T5:25.0% T6:10.5%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 491m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Pace Profile
Avg early pace vs closing speed from last 5 runs
| Dog | Early | Close | Style |
|---|---|---|---|
1Abbodabbo Emma | 59 | 16 | Fader |
2Montana Faithful | 41 | 84 | Closer |
3Hollyhill Patsy | 73 | 0 | Fader |
4Marcias Blue Boy | 64 | 0 | Fader |
5Beach Party | 0 | 100 | Closer |
6Montana Lady | 34 | 100 | Closer |
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.