Loading...
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Abbeyside Jetd 1y 24 | S W Deakin — 17% R519 W87 P242 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 39 | 49 | 40 (5) | 34 (6) | 57 (1) | 23 (3) | 15 (1) | 14 (6) | - | - | - | - | 14 | 27 | - | 34 | 14 | 18 | 6 | 7/1 | |
| 2 | ▶ Wingates Elsab 1y 24 | D Welding — 24% R68 W16 P44 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 59 | - | 26 (5) | 30 (1) | 25 (3) | 19 (6) | 22 (4) | - | - | - | - | - | 44 | 51 | - | 35 | 22 | 29 | 1 | 3/10F | |
| 3 | ▶ Attituded 1y 7 | F C O'hare — 0% R3 W0 P1 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 38 | 50 | 26 (2) | 18 (5) | 18 (4) | 18 (5) | - | - | - | - | - | - | 59 | 43 | - | 37 | 18 | 28 | 2 | 18/1 | |
| 4 | ▶ Crypto Dalejod 3y 14 | N P Ralph Jnr — 18% R50 W9 P29 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 53 | - | 23 (3) | 24 (3) | 26 (2) | 18 (6) | 22 (5) | 30 (1) | 26 (3) | 19 (6) | 20 (6) | 31 (1) | 41 | 25 | 39 | 25 | 23 | 26 | 4 | 4/1 | |
| 5 | ▶ Glengar Minervab 3y 4 | R Williams — 15% R321 W47 P156 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 48 | - | 21 (4) | 18 (5) | 23 (2) | 30 (1) | 18 (5) | 18 (5) | 17 (5) | 19 (5) | 21 (4) | 18 (6) | 16 | 25 | 21 | 25 | 19 | 20 | 5 | 10/1 | |
| 6 | ▶ Rathsilla Vaderd 4y 23 | I E Walker — 13% R241 W32 P113 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 60 | 48 | 33 (5) | 25 (6) | 32 (6) | 34 (4) | 41 (2) | 39 (3) | 29 (6) | 23 (6) | 27 (5) | 45 (3) | 20 | 32 | 15 | 28 | 32 | 30 | 3 | 22/1 | |
The most consistent performer at this level with three wins from her last five 270-metre starts. Her track suitability of 51 is the best in the field, confirming proven course form, and she has a respectable speed rating. While trap 2 is neutral rather than dominant at 17.9%, it avoids the dead zones of traps 1 and 3. She was slow away last time and ran on well late from this same box — if she can break more cleanly tonight, she has every chance. Her trainer has a strong 22% win rate. In a low-separation field where nothing stands out on ratings, her consistency and track knowledge give her a slight edge.
Best suited to the grade with a dominant draw — the main danger despite inconsistent recent form.
Weakest on form with the worst structural draw — very hard to see being involved in the finish.
Capable runner undone by the worst draw on the card — her form cannot overcome a 9% trap in a weak field.
Best draw but worst recent form among the contenders — the structural advantage is not enough to overcome persistent poor results.
Speed and draw are positives but a Closer profile in a sprint is a genuine concern — he may not get into the race quickly enough.
Strong outside bias — traps 4, 5 and 6 all win above 22%. Traps 1 and 3 are both dead at under 12%. LOW composite separation (R1 21.9% vs R3 17.4%) means ratings barely distinguish the top three — draw is the primary factor here.
T1:11.1% T2:17.9% T3:8.7% T4:22.2% T5:24.4% T6:23.7%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 270m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.