PGR: THE GLOBAL HOME OF GREYHOUND RACING
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Moneypoint Wiljod 3y 15 | R Lambe — 21% R126 W26 P63 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 48 | 31 | 27 (5) | 62 (3) | 47 (6) | 59 (6) | 68 (2) | 80 (4) | 59 (5) | 40 (2) | 85 (2) | 67 (3) | 55 | 53 | 14 | 49 | 62 | 59 | 5 | 2/1 | |
| 2 | ▶ No Jay Nod 2y 7 | D T Smith — 16% R403 W64 P196 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 48 | 51 | 43 (5) | 50 (5) | 79 (2) | 89 (2) | 60 (4) | 85 (1) | 58 (5) | 85 (1) | 92 (2) | 67 (4) | 54 | 37 | - | 48 | 77 | 66 | 4 | 10/1 | |
| 3 | ▶ Glenrock Aced 2y 18 | J R Hall — 21% R330 W69 P186 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 44 | 42 | 79 (2) | 53 (6) | 49 (5) | 74 (3) | 65 (4) | 91 (1) | 90 (1) | 79 (2) | 50 (5) | 70 (2) | 59 | 69 | 48 | 57 | 65 | 64 | 2 | 5/6F | |
| 4 | ▶ Moyar Browd 4y 26 | D Welding — 24% R68 W16 P44 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 55 | 55 | 41 (6) | 60 (5) | 84 (2) | 66 (4) | 75 (3) | 69 (4) | 91 (1) | 74 (2) | 88 (1) | 78 (2) | 56 | 63 | 27 | 45 | 74 | 67 | 1 | 7/2 | |
| 5 | ▶ Swift Zilchb 3y 6 | P A Holder — 12% R142 W17 P67 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 52 | 57 | 73 (3) | 86 (1) | 66 (4) | 54 (4) | 86 (1) | 66 (3) | 53 (6) | 61 (5) | 92 (1) | 89 (1) | 30 | 57 | 37 | 48 | 71 | 62 | 3 | 22/1 | |
The model favours him despite a historically dire trap — and there is logic to it. He has the best speed figures in the field and his Fader profile with strong early pace should see him lead from the boxes. His average performance of 74 puts him among the best in the race, and he has been consistent at this level with runs of 60, 83, 66, 75, and 69. His trainer has a solid 22% win rate and his suitability scores are strong across the board. The trap 4 concern is real from the aggregate data, but the sample is just 22 runs — too small to be conclusive. His class, speed, and consistency make him the model is selection.
Best dog in the race on raw form but a dead draw is a genuine concern — the main threat if he overcomes the structural headwind.
Strong draw and decent closing ability but gives too much ground early to be a serious winner — a place chance.
Outstanding course credentials but inconsistent recent form and a poor draw — capable of better but hard to rely on.
Extraordinary trap history supports him but his recent form has been poor — the draw keeps him in the conversation despite current struggles.
Small sample sizes but trap 5 is historically extraordinary at 47.6% from 21 runs — almost three times the expected rate. Trap 4 is dire at 4.5%. The top composite rank wins 29.8% — class tells at A1 level. Sample sizes are limited at this grade so treat trap data with caution.
T1:26.3% T2:12.5% T3:10.3% T4:4.5% T5:47.6% T6:21.4%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 480m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Pace Profile
Avg early pace vs closing speed from last 5 runs
| Dog | Early | Close | Style |
|---|---|---|---|
1Moneypoint Wiljo | 9 | 100 | Closer |
2No Jay No | 0 | 100 | Closer |
3Glenrock Ace | 50 | 50 | All-Rounder |
4Moyar Brow | 61 | 0 | Fader |
5Swift Zilch | 65 | 0 | Fader |
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.