| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Clay Lionessesb 3y 7 | T D Coote — 19% R573 W110 P290 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | - | - | 69 (2) | 51 (2) | 34 (6) | 47 (3) | 51 (3) | 49 (2) | 52 (3) | 45 (4) | 47 (3) | 31 (6) | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | 12/1 | |
| 2 | ▶ Star Strandd 2y 8 | I Zivkovic — 13% R602 W81 P284 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | - | - | 62 (1) | 54 (3) | 42 (4) | 45 (5) | 45 (5) | 64 (1) | 47 (3) | 49 (3) | 44 (5) | 49 (3) | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3 | 3/1 | |
| 3 | ▶ Monroe Marleyd 2y 16 | J G Hurst — 18% R267 W48 P152 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | - | - | 39 (5) | 56 (3) | 75 (1) | 44 (6) | 76 (1) | 49 (3) | 46 (5) | 59 (2) | 55 (2) | 46 (5) | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4 | 4/6F | |
| 4 | ▶ Bayview Fredd 5y 26 | M N May — 16% R271 W43 P106 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | - | - | 47 (4) | 41 (5) | 44 (5) | 65 (1) | 43 (5) | 47 (4) | 34 (5) | 24 (3) | 42 (5) | 51 (3) | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 8/1 | |
| 5 | ▶ Aussie Fionnd 4y 23 | W M Lyons — 19% R1040 W201 P556 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | - | - | 59 (2) | 43 (5) | 62 (1) | 53 (2) | 38 (5) | 51 (2) | 44 (4) | 52 (3) | 51 (3) | 64 (1) | - | - | - | - | - | - | 5 | 12/1 | |
| 6 | ▶ Twoshookmend 3y 24 | W M Lyons — 19% R1040 W201 P556 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | - | - | 51 (3) | 30 (2) | 31 (3) | 56 (3) | 58 (2) | 46 (4) | 64 (1) | 59 (2) | 28 (3) | 30 (2) | - | - | - | - | - | - | 6 | 5/1 | |
Bayview Fred has the prediction but this is a tentative selection. His last run was a modest third at D4 268 metres — a sprint that tells us very little about his A7 462-metre ability. His recent A7 form before that sprint was moderate: a fifth at 43 when checked and a third at 51 when also checked. He has placed at this level but hasn't won in A7 company and tends to get into trouble at the first bend. Trap 4 is slightly below average at 15.4 percent. The prediction is based on his overall form profile, but on tonight's evidence — back from a sprint, mid-table A7 form, neutral draw — there are runners in this field with stronger claims.
Recent A7 course and distance winner with a strong finishing kick from a good draw — clear danger.
Dead trap and inconsistent form — the draw alone makes her very hard to back.
A6 form and the dominant trap — class dropper from the best draw is always interesting.
Best recent form in the race but below-average draw — could easily outperform the prediction.
Front-running style but fades over this trip — will lead early but others will pass him.
Normal composite separation — the model has some predictive value here. Trap 3 is clearly the best box but the pick is in neutral T4.
T1:10.0%(160) T2:19.5%(246) T3:22.6%(270) T4:15.4%(280) T5:15.0%(287) T6:17.9%(279)
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 462m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.