Loading racecard
Loading racecard
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Glenadda Lilyb 4y 15 | P Ward — 16% R211 W33 P107 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 61 | 38 | 66 (1) | 53 (3) | 54 (4) | 37 (3) | 63 (2) | 50 (3) | 67 (1) | 26 (2) | 29 (1) | 23 (3) | 38 | 27 | 29 | 22 | 40 | 36 | 4 | 7/2 | |
| 2 | ▶ Salems Bansheeb 1y 14 | S A Clark — 25% R177 W45 P98 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 54 | 47 | 21 (5) | 34 (6) | 19 (6) | 45 (4) | 47 (3) | 46 (3) | 56 (2) | 44 (4) | 66 (1) | 43 (4) | 35 | 35 | 23 | 20 | 43 | 38 | 3 | 10/11F | |
| 3 | ▶ Tanvalley Blonded 2y 17 | D K Hurlock — 19% R918 W173 P504 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 100 | 100 | 25 (2) | 23 (4) | 30 (1) | 27 (2) | 24 (2) | 18 (3) | 22 (5) | - | - | - | 28 | 27 | - | - | 21 | 24 | 1 | 11/2 | |
| 4 | ▶ Moaning Ivyb 5y 33 | D F Carter — 15% R383 W57 P200 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 34 | 52 | 29 (6) | 42 (6) | 35 (4) | 45 (5) | 64 (2) | 23 (1) | 15 (3) | 43 (6) | 18 (5) | - | 24 | 26 | 28 | 25 | 36 | 31 | 5 | 8/1 | |
| 5 | ▶ Salems Mickeyd 2y 15 | S A Clark — 25% R177 W45 P98 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 37 | 51 | 48 (2) | 45 (4) | 49 (3) | 64 (1) | 30 (6) | 56 (2) | 48 (2) | 28 (2) | 45 (3) | 41 (4) | 20 | 19 | 24 | 14 | 39 | 30 | 6 | 7/2 | |
| 6 | ▶ Ardnasool Hulkd 4y 26 | P Clarke — 14% R517 W74 P285 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 47 | 47 | 30 (1) | 20 (5) | 45 (3) | 37 (5) | 63 (1) | 39 (5) | 45 (4) | 24 (3) | 40 (2) | - | 36 | 33 | 38 | 35 | 49 | 43 | 2 | 6/1 | |
Tanvalley Blonde is a fascinating gamble. Her speed, bend, and early pace numbers are all the highest possible — she's clearly an outstanding sprinter with devastating early pace. The prediction model has identified her as the winner based on these extraordinary speed figures. The concern is fundamental: her distance suitability is zero, meaning she has no form at 415 metres. This is a sprint specialist stepping up to a four-bend trip for the first time. If her blistering early pace builds a big enough lead, the closers may never catch her. But if the stamina runs out through bends three and four, she could fade dramatically. An intriguing but highly uncertain selection.
Dominant rail draw with strong speed — the four-bend geometry compounds the advantage for the closer.
Much the best on proven form from a strong draw — the banker alternative if the pick's stamina gives out.
Solid closer from a good kennel but the draw doesn't help and she lacks the structural advantages of others.
Will be involved early but lacks the speed and quality to sustain a challenge.
Right running style but the lowest suitability scores in the race suggest these conditions don't suit.
Pick has extraordinary sprint data (speed, bend, EP all 100) but zero distance suitability — a sprinter stepping up to 415m for the first time. High risk. T1 dominates from 734 runs.
T1:21.53% T2:16.88% T3:16.39% T4:17.59% T5:17.70% T6:19.91%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 415m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Pace Profile
Avg early pace vs closing speed from last 5 runs
| Dog | Early | Close | Style |
|---|---|---|---|
1Glenadda Lily | 31 | 100 | Closer |
2Salems Banshee | 47 | 67 | Closer |
3Tanvalley Blonde | 100 | 0 | Fader |
4Moaning Ivy | 49 | 41 | All-Rounder |
5Salems Mickey | 52 | 43 | All-Rounder |
6Ardnasool Hulk | 51 | 57 | Closer |
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.