| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Moaning Mccoistd 3y 6 | D B Whitton — 26% R312 W81 P196 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 61 | 51 | 23 (4) | 28 (2) | 49 (3) | 60 (2) | 54 (3) | 28 (3) | 28 (2) | 53 (3) | 31 (2) | 74 (1) | 25 | 56 | 27 | 50 | 47 | 44 | 3 | 2/1 | |
| 2 | ▶ Manic Mondayb 3y 16 | D F Carter — 15% R392 W58 P205 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 59 | - | 24 (5) | 33 (5) | 28 (2) | 27 (2) | - | - | - | - | - | - | 44 | 60 | 30 | 56 | 29 | 39 | 1 | 6/5F | |
| 3 | ▶ Essjay Evergreenb 5y 16 | P Clarke — 14% R522 W75 P287 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 46 | 49 | 32 (1) | 20 (5) | 30 (1) | 17 (6) | 33 (1) | 26 (3) | 23 (5) | 26 (2) | 21 (5) | 22 (5) | 35 | 30 | 34 | 30 | 28 | 30 | 5 | 20/1 | |
| 4 | ▶ Tickets Kingd 2y 13 | S A Clark — 25% R185 W47 P104 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 43 | - | 28 (3) | 34 (1) | 28 (2) | 28 (2) | 31 (1) | 19 (6) | 54 (6) | 73 (4) | 54 (6) | 70 (5) | 30 | 47 | 30 | 47 | 68 | 55 | 2 | 5/1 | |
| 5 | ▶ Kerabellec Nelld 4y 24 | P Ward — 15% R216 W33 P110 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 46 | - | 19 (5) | 33 (1) | 22 (4) | 33 (1) | 27 (3) | 33 (1) | 25 (4) | 19 (6) | 23 (5) | 34 (1) | 34 | 30 | 29 | 32 | 28 | 30 | 6 | 6/1 | |
| 6 | ▶ Outlanderd 5y 26 | P Crowson — 33% R6 W2 P5 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 50 | - | 31 (2) | 25 (4) | 23 (4) | 22 (5) | 25 (5) | 34 (1) | 26 (5) | 33 (1) | 28 (3) | 20 (4) | 40 | 41 | 35 | 25 | 26 | 31 | 4 | 4/1 | |
Manic Monday takes the prediction on the strength of a very quick speed rating of 59 — second only to Moaning Mccoist and well ahead of the rest. Her recent form average of 29 is middling for a D4 but at this level in a low-separation sprint, speed is far more predictive than form figures. The trap 2 draw is below expected at 16.63% which is a concern, but her individual trap suitability of 44 — the highest in the field — suggests she handles this position better than most. No pace profile data is available, adding an element of uncertainty.
Best speed and a strong draw offset the closing style — genuine danger despite the profile mismatch.
The dominant draw is his main weapon — modest form but the trap does a lot of the heavy lifting.
Right running style but doesn't have the speed to compete with the faster dogs.
Huge class drop but desperately short of speed for a 238-metre sprint — the trip may not suit.
Dead draw and modest ability — hard to see a path to victory.
Extreme low separation — R1 barely beats R3. T6 dominant and T1 strong. Trap bias should lead the analysis. Speed rank 1 is far more predictive than composite.
T1:20.19% T2:16.63% T3:17.62% T4:17.52% T5:15.11% T6:23.52%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 238m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.