Loading...
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Cofam Princessb 2y 5 | D K Hurlock — 19% R930 W176 P509 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 50 | - | 26 (4) | 34 (2) | 34 (1) | 20 (5) | 19 (5) | 24 (4) | 49 (3) | 22 (6) | 23 (4) | - | 4 | 53 | - | 49 | - | 12 | 6 | 11/4 | |
| 2 | ▶ Brosna Stard 4y 15 | D F Carter — 15% R395 W58 P207 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 53 | - | 29 (1) | 19 (6) | 24 (3) | 25 (2) | 18 (5) | 20 (4) | 23 (3) | 29 (1) | 26 (2) | 24 (3) | 30 | 33 | 35 | 32 | 24 | 27 | 4 | 9/2 | |
| 3 | ▶ Moaning Louiseb 1y 6 | D B Whitton — 26% R313 W82 P197 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 46 | - | 31 (1) | 17 (5) | 26 (3) | 20 (5) | 24 (4) | 32 (1) | 19 (5) | 25 (3) | 30 (1) | 25 (2) | 34 | 52 | 45 | 48 | 26 | 33 | 2 | 3/1 | |
| 4 | ▶ Oppod 3y 36 | D F Carter — 15% R395 W58 P207 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 48 | 49 | 44 (3) | 22 (3) | 36 (5) | 19 (5) | 20 (3) | 51 (2) | 23 (3) | 47 (3) | 35 (4) | 50 (3) | 30 | 44 | 19 | 9 | 46 | 39 | 1 | 8/1 | |
| 5 | ▶ Mister Bojanglesd 2y 6 | D B Whitton — 26% R313 W82 P197 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 51 | - | 26 (2) | 18 (5) | 30 (1) | 19 (4) | 19 (5) | 20 (5) | 28 (2) | 20 (5) | 30 (1) | 25 (3) | 29 | 37 | 31 | 41 | 24 | 28 | 3 | 5/2JF | |
| 6 | ▶ Glenadda Poppyb 4y 24 | P Ward — 15% R218 W33 P111 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 49 | 51 | 21 (6) | 47 (4) | 30 (3) | 22 (1) | 18 (4) | 29 (6) | 18 (2) | 30 (6) | 19 (1) | - | 28 | 28 | 42 | 34 | 22 | 25 | 5 | 5/2JF | |
Oppo is the most talented dog in this race by an enormous margin — his average performance of 46 is twenty points clear of the next best. The prediction model has identified this class edge as decisive. The concern is his closing style and a distance suitability of just 9, which screams that the 238-metre sprint isn't his natural trip. He's built to close over longer distances and the tight Harlow circuit at this sprint distance gives closers almost no room to make up ground. If he overcomes the style mismatch through sheer quality, he'll win easily. If the trip catches him out, don't be surprised.
Strong suitability from a good draw — the course knowledge could prove decisive if the pick's style doesn't suit.
The right running style from the right trap — the structural favourite regardless of modest form figures.
No form to work with and the worst trap suitability in the field — a complete unknown.
Honest runner with decent speed but lacking a clear edge over the field.
Reasonable ability but the dead draw at trap 5 is a structural wall.
Pick has enormous class advantage (P46 vs field avg ~24) but is a Closer with distance suitability of just 9 — severe structural mismatch at 238m.
T1:17.41% T2:17.03% T3:19.48% T4:18.65% T5:15.82% T6:22.53%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 238m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.