Loading...
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Swift Unod 6y 15 | M J Rice — 21% R125 W26 P76 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 46 | 50 | 18 (6) | 28 (2) | 52 (3) | 33 (1) | 19 (2) | 22 (1) | 19 (1) | 61 (2) | 21 (2) | - | 38 | 41 | 32 | 35 | 37 | 38 | 3 | 7/2 | |
| 2 | ▶ Jura Yala Enkib 4y 46 | M J Rice — 21% R125 W26 P76 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 53 | 34 | 62 (2) | 22 (5) | 55 (4) | 61 (2) | 32 (1) | 58 (2) | 22 (1) | 28 (3) | 55 (4) | 53 (2) | 52 | 66 | 23 | 55 | 38 | 46 | 2 | 4/1 | |
| 3 | ▶ Links Aphrodited 3y 14 | D R Jinks — 16% R534 W85 P292 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 46 | - | 24 (1) | 20 (5) | 20 (4) | 23 (4) | 25 (3) | 33 (1) | 15 (5) | 27 (3) | 21 (5) | 28 (3) | 37 | 28 | 21 | 25 | 24 | 28 | 6 | 8/1 | |
| 4 | ▶ Outdoor Tunnesd 3y 36 | D R Jinks — 16% R534 W85 P292 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 50 | 64 | 36 (3) | 30 (6) | 46 (4) | 18 (2) | 17 (3) | 14 (5) | 18 (3) | 56 (3) | 28 (2) | 42 (4) | 34 | 45 | 23 | 22 | 43 | 39 | 1 | 6/5F | |
| 5 | ▶ Edermine Bucksd 2y 6 | D R E Ellerker — 20% R684 W138 P359 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 46 | - | 34 (1) | 24 (4) | 27 (3) | 27 (3) | 52 (2) | 33 (1) | 15 (5) | 18 (4) | 20 (4) | - | 39 | 36 | 27 | 40 | 26 | 32 | 5 | 7/1 | |
| 6 | ▶ Sussex Orchidb 4y 35 | P B Witchell — 17% R103 W17 P54 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 54 | - | 13 (6) | 26 (3) | 21 (3) | 33 (2) | 31 (1) | 25 (1) | 23 (3) | 25 (4) | 25 (3) | - | 42 | 35 | 25 | 39 | 28 | 33 | 4 | 10/3 | |
Best perf in the field by 5 points (P43 vs P38) with the best early pace by a wide margin: EP71 and Bend64 are the most explosive numbers in any D4 sprint this evening. She'll blaze to the first bend from T4 and lead through the bend. At 238m, the Fader profile (CS20) is mitigated because the trip is too short for the full fade to develop — the same principle that makes Faders viable at all sprint distances. Form is concerning: 72→26→22→21→30 shows a steep decline from a 72 peak, with recent runs of 22→21→30 showing only a modest recovery. The 72 was clearly her ceiling but even the recent 30 is competitive with this field's second-best (P38 average). Jinks at 20% is awareness-level. T4 at D4 wins 17.26% — mid-table, not a trap advantage. The selection is driven by the combination of best perf + best early pace at a sprint distance where leading through the bend is usually decisive.
DANGER: Best suit (SM49, track 66) + P38 second-best. Would be the pick at 415m but Closer at 238m is structurally mismatched. She'll finish close but needs Outdoor Tunnes to have problems.
Balanced profile + T1 rail + recent 48 peak. But P37 is 6 behind and she lacks the extreme pace to lead or close. Solid but not a winner here.
Outclassed by 19 points. T3 sweet spot is irrelevant when the ability gap is this wide.
Improving but from too low a base and in the dead draw. The 31 ceiling is 12 points behind the leader.
T6 draw + best speed is normally a strong combination but the 15-point perf gap to the leader is too wide. One for the place market only.
T6 dominant at 23.57%. T4 at 17.26% is mid-table — the trap isn't a structural advantage. But when a Fader with EP71 leads from T4 at 238m, the pace profile overrides the trap statistics.
T1:20.22% T2:16.85% T3:17.83% T4:17.26% T5:14.86% T6:23.57%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 238m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.