Loading...
GREYHOUNDS MAKE GREAT PETS
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Tip Top Katieb 2y 7 | K M O'flaherty — 19% R329 W64 P174 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 44 | 42 | 44 (1) | 32 (2) | 58 (1) | 46 (2) | 24 (5) | 31 (4) | 23 (5) | 29 (4) | 44 (1) | 20 (6) | 40 | 47 | 36 | 34 | 34 | 37 | 3 | 6/1 | |
| 2 | ▶ Miss Manageb 2y 19 | D K Hurlock — 19% R926 W175 P508 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 48 | 54 | 52 (1) | 41 (3) | 39 (3) | 40 (3) | 29 (6) | 53 (1) | 39 (3) | 45 (1) | 55 (1) | 28 (4) | 27 | 28 | 12 | 28 | 31 | 29 | 4 | 9/2 | |
| 3 | ▶ Ruadhans Boyd 1y 7 | D K Hurlock — 19% R926 W175 P508 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 52 | 46 | 48 (3) | 46 (3) | 59 (1) | 51 (1) | 45 (1) | 37 (3) | 47 (2) | 43 (2) | 31 (5) | 46 (1) | 62 | 50 | 30 | 45 | 41 | 47 | 1 | 7/4F | |
| 4 | ▶ Blue Girl Sadieb 3y 47 | B Doyle — 15% R240 W37 P122 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 52 | 52 | 30 (5) | 26 (5) | 31 (4) | 24 (4) | 21 (4) | 35 (1) | 25 (5) | 30 (2) | 32 (1) | 31 (2) | 26 | 19 | - | 16 | 28 | 25 | 6 | 4/1 | |
| 5 | ▶ Clovass Spiceb 3y 3 | A Kelly-pilgrim — 14% R206 W28 P90 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 45 | 48 | 29 (6) | 31 (3) | 57 (1) | 34 (5) | 28 (6) | 34 (5) | 28 | 20 (4) | 20 (6) | - | 31 | 35 | 31 | 35 | 31 | 32 | 5 | 16/1 | |
| 6 | ▶ Tea Leaf Thord 3y 5 | G E Evans — 23% R291 W66 P152 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 52 | 50 | 41 (3) | 50 (1) | 27 (5) | 23 (6) | 38 (4) | 41 (3) | 33 (5) | 54 (1) | 46 (1) | 29 (5) | 34 | 36 | 58 | 29 | 35 | 34 | 2 | 2/1 | |
Ruadhans Boy is the standout composite threat in this field and represents genuine quality meeting genuine form at the right grade. Composite 47 (race high) paired with exceptional trap suitability of 62 positions him to exploit Romford's early-position advantage while his consistent back-end strength (bend 46) means he won't fade as second-bend pressures mount. Recent form is substantive: p2→p5→p1→p1→p4 with performances tracking 43→31→46→54→36 shows two competitive wins in the last four runs, the perf-54 representing genuine A11 quality. He's from D K Hurlock (WR 14%) whose record is modest, but individual quality shines through. Trap T3 sits in dominant group (20.46%) and his trap suit (62) is highest in the field, giving direct structural advantage at a track where early position is premium currency. The suitability profile across all four dimensions is balanced (track 50, distance 45, trap 62, class 30), suggesting he's arrived at this level with genuine capability rather than quirky compatibility. Pace profile as a Closer (PaceCon 78) means he won't lead early but his speed (52) and bend rating (46) position him to capitalize when Katie begins to fade through the middle stages. This is a pick backed by composite strength, suitability advantage, structural trap positioning, and recent form trajectory. Medium-confidence assignment reflects the competitive nature of A11 and Romford's early-pace bias.
T1 advantage is real but compromised by below-average composite, modest suitability across dimensions, and recent wins at lower grades. Dangerous if she leads early, but lacks back-end strength to hold position against Ruadhans Boy's fitness.
Improving trajectory (29→27→34→40→49 over five runs) is most consistent in field. Class suit (58) is field-leading, indicating genuine A11 fitness. Trap penalty (T6, 14.42%) is real but his form development is strong enough to overcome it. Danger if early pace is strong and middle phases offer opportunity.
Composite 29, terrible class suitability (12), consistent mid-rear form, poor suitability across all four dimensions. Trap dominance cannot overcome fundamental grade mismatch. Expect mid-field finish.
Extreme Fader from poor trap with zero class suitability and composite 25. Will show early promise then fade through bends 2-4. Recent wins at much lower grades. Fundamentally over-graded and pace archetype is worst-case for Romford 400m.
Composite 32, consistent rear-of-field form, no winning trajectory, modest trainer record. T5 dominance offers structural positioning but cannot overcome weak individual metrics. Mid-field finish expected.
Normal separation (11.3pp) suggests predictable race; trap dominance is moderate. Romford 400m favourites trap placement but class field (A11) has sufficient depth that suitability becomes critical.
T1: 21.2%, T2: 21.07%, T3: 20.46%, T4: 18.92%, T5: 20.81%, T6: 14.42%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 400m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Pace Profile
Avg early pace vs closing speed from last 5 runs
| Dog | Early | Close | Style |
|---|---|---|---|
1Tip Top Katie | 45 | 60 | Closer |
2Miss Manage | 50 | 38 | All-Rounder |
3Ruadhans Boy | 39 | 62 | Closer |
4Blue Girl Sadie | 55 | 42 | Fader |
5Clovass Spice | 51 | 49 | All-Rounder |
6Tea Leaf Thor | 50 | 51 | All-Rounder |
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.