EVERY SOFA DESERVES A GREYHOUND
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | Bet | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | ||||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Katsumotod 4y 35 | G E Evans — 21% R297 W62 P157 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 48 | 51 | 39 (5) | 52 (4) | 49 (5) | 40 (5) | 61 (2) | 34 (6) | 51 (5) | 43 (6) | 90 (1) | 59 (5) | 43 | 37 | - | 22 | 49 | 40 | 5 | 5/1 | - | |
| 2 | ▶ Lansdowne Vinnyd 1y 16 | D Mullins — 21% R357 W74 P230 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 51 | 29 | 69 (1) | 55 (3) | 49 (3) | 38 (5) | - | - | - | - | - | - | 25 | 13 | 10 | 21 | 55 | 38 | 1 | 5/1 | - | |
| 3 | ▶ Jacktavern Lunab 2y 28 | P W Young — 18% R1290 W229 P713 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 39 | 67 | 49 (6) | 69 (5) | 53 (1) | 48 (3) | 46 (4) | 51 (3) | 33 (4) | 41 (6) | 27 (4) | - | 31 | 33 | 20 | 22 | 50 | 35 | 6 | 5/1 | - | |
| 4 | ▶ Yahoo Heidib 1y 6 | P W Young — 18% R1290 W229 P713 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 49 | 53 | 50 (5) | 70 (4) | 64 (1) | 40 (2) | 30 (5) | 43 (6) | 51 (6) | 63 (1) | - | - | 28 | 33 | 6 | 30 | 52 | 45 | 4 | 10/3 | - | |
| 5 | ▶ Harley Hitchb 2y 9 | D W Lee — 23% R237 W55 P127 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 53 | 53 | 60 (3) | 70 (1) | 56 (3) | 54 (4) | 51 (4) | 58 (3) | 52 (2) | 50 (4) | 51 (4) | 49 (5) | 29 | 31 | 20 | 25 | 57 | 47 | 3 | 9/2 | - | |
| 6 | ▶ Gallant Kingd 4y 18 | G E Evans — 21% R297 W62 P157 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 58 | 44 | 58 (2) | 62 (2) | 67 (2) | 68 (2) | 50 (5) | 68 (2) | 50 (6) | 51 (5) | 66 (3) | 67 (3) | 34 | 33 | 31 | 39 | 61 | 51 | 2 | 7/4F | - | |
The model's selection in the final race, rooted in A5-grade dynamics and the dominant draw. Trap 2 wins 24.3% from 226 runs at A5 — the most productive box for this grade and distance — and the ultra-composite algorithm's speed metrics support Lansdowne Vinny's pace profile above more highly-composited rivals. Composite of 38 is not the field's highest, but in A5 grade (composite R1 wins only 20.8%) the algorithm explicitly down-weights composite and prioritises fieldSpeed and first-bend data. Average performance of 55 is competitive. The dominant trap draw combined with a validated speed advantage makes this a coherent, grade-appropriate selection.
Second-best composite and strong avgP. Main analytical threat despite below-average trap.
Below the composite leaders and mid-field on performance. Against.
Near-lowest composite and model's last pick. Against.
Third-best composite but worst draw. Limited prospect at top of market.
Highest composite and performance in the field but model's 2nd pick in A5 dead zone. Each-way interest.
A5 composite dead zone: R1 wins only 20.8%. Trap 2 dominates at 24.3%. Speed override common at this grade — algorithm built for it.
T1:19.7% T2:24.3% T3:20.5% T4:12.7% T5:14.5% T6:16.6%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 400m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Pace Profile
Avg early pace vs closing speed from last 5 runs
| Dog | Early | Close | Style |
|---|---|---|---|
1Katsumoto | 49 | 47 | All-Rounder |
2Lansdowne Vinny | 33 | 99 | Closer |
3Jacktavern Luna | 58 | 18 | Fader |
4Yahoo Heidi | 58 | 19 | Fader |
5Harley Hitch | 51 | 53 | All-Rounder |
6Gallant King | 46 | 82 | Closer |
Only runs at exactly 400m — no cross-distance comparisons. Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.