Loading...
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Not Wired Upd 3y 14 | I Zivkovic — 13% R604 W81 P285 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 59 | 50 | 29 (3) | 29 (4) | 28 (4) | 34 (5) | 37 (3) | 28 (1) | 37 (5) | 44 (2) | 33 (5) | - | 33 | 28 | 20 | 40 | 46 | 40 | 1 | 3/1 | |
| 2 | ▶ Westfield Frankd 4y 14 | J S Atkins — 14% R290 W40 P154 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 47 | - | 33 (4) | 35 (2) | 33 (2) | 24 (6) | 35 (3) | 35 (3) | 64 (4) | 63 (3) | 29 (5) | 42 (1) | 34 | 37 | 36 | 30 | 44 | 40 | 6 | 9/1 | |
| 3 | ▶ Deecee Gracieb 2y 37 | W M Lyons — 19% R1043 W202 P557 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 53 | 53 | 41 (6) | 46 (5) | 84 (1) | 47 (1) | 40 (6) | 46 (1) | 43 (1) | 60 (4) | 54 (5) | 81 (1) | 61 | 57 | - | 31 | 61 | 58 | 2 | 4/1 | |
| 4 | ▶ Nellys Promiseb 3y 36 | W M Lyons — 19% R1043 W202 P557 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 49 | 50 | 41 (6) | 45 (6) | 45 (6) | 41 (6) | 71 (2) | 48 (5) | 61 (4) | 57 (4) | 49 (4) | 53 (5) | 37 | 47 | - | - | 60 | 51 | 4 | 10/1 | |
| 5 | ▶ Grovenor Apached 2y 5 | B Heaton — 15% R196 W30 P96 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 53 | - | 23 (6) | 32 (3) | 25 (5) | 23 (6) | 31 (3) | 31 (4) | 30 (4) | 87 (2) | 47 (1) | 40 (2) | 32 | 47 | 40 | 41 | 37 | 38 | 3 | 9/4 | |
| 6 | ▶ Nurney Sniperb 4y 26 | J S Atkins — 14% R290 W40 P154 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 49 | - | 29 (3) | 42 (1) | 34 (2) | 37 (3) | 30 (2) | 35 (4) | 37 (2) | 34 (2) | 30 (1) | - | 30 | 45 | 38 | 44 | 31 | 34 | 5 | 2/1F | |
Not Wired Up is the projected winner from the marginally best trap on the card, with trap 1 winning at 18.2% in D2 sprints. His form has been frustrating — a peak of 71 in his recent history shows he has genuine D2 ability, but he has not been able to sustain it, dropping to 37 last time and 26 the run before. That inconsistency is the hallmark of his profile and makes him a risky pick despite his proven ceiling. If he turns up in anything like his best form, the rail draw will help him dictate from the front. The pick is based on overall ability rather than current momentum.
In the form of his life right now — if the improvement is real, he's the one to beat.
Class act when right — the 82 shows her ceiling but the 25 shows her floor. A genuine danger on her better days.
Most consistent and highest-rated runner in the field — a genuine contender regardless of the draw.
Dead draw and form in steep decline — very hard to see him featuring tonight.
Improving steadily but still well below the class of the main contenders.
Relatively flat trap distribution except T5 which is severely dead at 7.4%. Composite rank shows no meaningful separation — R3 actually beats R1. Pure ratings are unreliable at D2 268m; form and ability are more important than structural factors.
T1:18.2% T2:16.5% T3:16.7% T4:15.1% T5:7.4% T6:15.3%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 268m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.