| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Coologue Bessb 6y 25 | W E Smith — 0% R10 W0 P4 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 46 | 38 | 39 (4) | 55 (3) | 22 (3) | 15 (6) | 47 (3) | 40 (4) | 36 (4) | 38 (4) | 58 (1) | 38 (6) | 42 | 32 | - | 40 | 36 | 37 | 4 | 7/1 | |
| 2 | ▶ Teebayb 4y 37 | I Zivkovic — 13% R606 W81 P285 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 58 | 50 | 28 (1) | 27 (2) | 17 (5) | 18 (6) | 27 (2) | 24 (3) | 30 (1) | 19 (4) | 19 (4) | 21 (4) | 32 | 31 | 26 | 17 | 26 | 27 | 1 | 11/8 | |
| 3 | ▶ Mustang Lucad 5y 36 | J Robinson — 19% R297 W56 P169 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 52 | - | 31 (4) | 41 (4) | 43 (2) | 30 (1) | 24 (2) | 15 (6) | 26 (2) | 53 (2) | 28 (1) | 16 (5) | 37 | 29 | 35 | 33 | 23 | 28 | 2 | 8/1 | |
| 4 | ▶ Laylas Friendd 2y 7 | S Smith — 20% R66 W13 P26 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 45 | 54 | 23 (3) | 20 (5) | 20 (5) | 26 (3) | 26 (3) | 30 (4) | 33 (4) | 29 (1) | 20 (4) | - | 38 | 52 | 25 | 45 | 29 | 36 | 6 | 6/5F | |
| 5 | ▶ Jaxleg Jessb 5y 15 | B Heaton — 15% R196 W30 P96 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 50 | - | 15 (6) | 21 (4) | 22 (3) | 19 (5) | 18 (6) | 23 (2) | 18 (5) | 28 (1) | 12 (6) | 14 (5) | 27 | 26 | 24 | 22 | 21 | 23 | 3 | 14/1 | |
| 6 | ▶ Millrose Kennyd 3y 24 | J G Hurst — 18% R271 W49 P154 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 46 | - | 13 (6) | 19 (4) | 14 (6) | 20 (4) | 19 (4) | 14 (6) | 24 (2) | 18 (6) | 19 (4) | 44 (5) | 36 | 31 | 9 | 16 | 17 | 23 | 5 | 9/1 | |
Teebay is the projected winner largely on the strength of his trap draw — trap 2 wins at over 24% in D5 sprints at Kinsley, the best box by a clear margin. His form is nothing to write home about with recent figures of 19, 21, and 22, but at this lowly grade, modest form in the right trap can be enough. He has shown he belongs at D5 level with reasonable consistency and the structural advantage of the draw gives him a genuine edge that his form alone would not. In a sprint where early pace matters, the inside draw should ensure he gets a clean run to the first bend.
If she can repeat her last run she wins easily — but the form history suggests that effort was exceptional rather than typical.
Poor draw and limited form — would need plenty to go right to feature.
Improving form is encouraging and the draw is decent — one to keep an eye on for future starts.
Inconsistent and struggling at this level — a place at best would be a good result.
Weakest form in the field by some distance — the draw cannot overcome the ability gap.
Trap 2 stands out as the dominant box at D5 268m, winning at nearly 8pp above expected. Trap 3 is the weakest. In a low-grade sprint where form is volatile, the draw is the strongest signal.
T1:17.0% T2:24.2% T3:14.8% T4:19.6% T5:17.0% T6:18.5%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 268m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.