HARLOW V SUFFOLF DOWNS INTERTRACK
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Townsend Tonyab 2y 17 | D R Jinks — 16% R534 W85 P292 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 47 | - | 39 (4) | 29 (2) | 25 (3) | 29 (2) | 25 (4) | 28 (2) | 19 (3) | 20 (6) | 26 (3) | 25 (4) | 31 | 47 | - | 24 | 25 | 29 | 5 | 5/1 | |
| 2 | ▶ Hillcroft Mickd 3y 26 | P S Rea — 17% R520 W86 P255 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 97 | 30 | 53 (2) | 39 (5) | 9 (5) | 11 (6) | 11 (6) | 69 (3) | 72 (4) | 78 (1) | 80 (1) | 76 (1) | 46 | 15 | - | - | 69 | 53 | 1 | 2/1 | |
| 3 | ▶ Grouchos Kingd 3y 22 | P S Rea — 17% R520 W86 P255 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 38 | 47 | 45 (5) | 49 (4) | 53 (3) | 79 (1) | 34 (1) | 22 (2) | 17 (4) | 33 (3) | 35 (2) | 41 (1) | 65 | - | - | - | 36 | 49 | 4 | 1/1F | |
| 4 | ▶ Sallins Flyerd 1y 4 | D R E Ellerker — 20% R684 W138 P359 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 51 | - | 20 (4) | 27 (3) | 30 (2) | 21 (5) | 34 (4) | 23 (4) | 50 (2) | 21 (1) | 21 (4) | 31 (2) | 21 | 48 | - | 39 | 25 | 28 | 6 | 8/1 | |
| 5 | ▶ Up Northb 2y 16 | P S Rea — 17% R520 W86 P255 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 75 | 59 | 61 (2) | 71 (1) | 65 (1) | 47 (3) | 22 (1) | 21 (1) | 16 (3) | 48 (4) | 49 (4) | 44 (5) | 30 | - | - | - | 45 | 38 | 2 | 12/1 | |
| 6 | ▶ Sussex Orchidb 4y 35 | P B Witchell — 17% R103 W17 P54 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 51 | - | 13 (6) | 26 (3) | 24 (3) | 33 (4) | 31 (1) | 25 (1) | 23 (3) | 25 (4) | 25 (3) | - | 42 | 44 | - | 36 | 27 | 33 | 3 | 9/2 | |
Hillcroft Mick is an extraordinary class dropper arriving from A3 company with form figures in the seventies and eighties — a level of ability these rivals simply cannot match. Three wins from his last five starts at top-class level confirm he's in excellent form. The concerns are genuine though: he's never raced at Harlow, he's a closer which is the wrong style for a tight sprint, trap 2 is a weak draw, and his trainer has a very low win rate. The class edge is enormous but the venue, trip, and style all work against him.
Strong class dropper from A5 — the main danger despite the draw.
Honest D4 form but outclassed by the stronger arrivals.
Best trap suitability from a good draw — could outrun expectations.
Solid venue form but not in the same league as the class droppers.
Dominant draw with venue form — a place chance if the big guns falter.
IT trial grade with minimal condition data. Rely on individual form, pace profile, and general Harlow 238m trap bias. Maximum uncertainty — Speculative confidence.
Insufficient data (25 runs). Using general Harlow 238m profile: T6 dominant, T3 second-best, T5 dead.
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 238m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.