| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Yassoo Nanb 5y 23 | G Andreas — 18% R284 W50 P149 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 49 | - | 31 (4) | 36 (2) | 36 (1) | 36 (1) | 29 (3) | 32 (2) | 28 (4) | 34 (6) | 30 (1) | - | 50 | 38 | 37 | 38 | 30 | 36 | 3 | 5/1 | |
| 2 | ▶ Broadway Worldd 6y 24 | M Mavrias — 18% R343 W63 P181 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 48 | - | 28 (3) | 20 (6) | 32 (3) | 37 (1) | 26 (5) | 31 (4) | 26 (4) | 33 (3) | 32 (4) | 33 (3) | 63 | 43 | - | 40 | 29 | 40 | 2 | 7/2 | |
| 3 | ▶ Dance Callieb 2y 25 | G Andreas — 18% R284 W50 P149 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 54 | - | 43 (6) | 21 (6) | 39 (2) | 32 (3) | 41 (1) | 37 (1) | 28 (3) | 26 (5) | 29 (5) | 21 (6) | 45 | 39 | 18 | 39 | 28 | 34 | 1 | 7/4F | |
| 4 | ▶ Kratosd 5y 35 | N F Carter — 17% R250 W42 P132 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 47 | - | 13 (6) | 24 (4) | 22 (5) | 28 (3) | 22 (5) | 33 (2) | 25 (4) | 27 (3) | 30 (2) | 23 (5) | 44 | 28 | 34 | 28 | 28 | 32 | 4 | 8/1 | |
| 5 | ▶ Whitehills Gentd 2y 17 | M Mavrias — 18% R343 W63 P181 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 50 | - | 21 (6) | 29 (4) | 38 (2) | 35 (1) | 28 (3) | 28 (4) | 31 (2) | 27 (4) | 28 (2) | 26 (4) | 16 | 32 | 14 | 30 | 28 | 26 | 5 | 5/1 | |
| 6 | ▶ Fahoura Ladd 5y 15 | M Mavrias — 18% R343 W63 P181 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 48 | - | 30 (4) | 29 (3) | 32 (1) | 23 (3) | 22 (4) | 19 (6) | 26 (4) | 32 (2) | 28 (4) | 23 (5) | 32 | 32 | 28 | 27 | 26 | 28 | 6 | 3/1 | |
Dance Callie has the model's projection but it's a marginal call at best in a low-separation sprint. Her form is modest — a sequence of mid-to-high twenties ratings with plenty of fifth and sixth-place finishes mixed in. She won at D2 level six starts ago but has struggled since dropping in class, which isn't an encouraging sign. Trap three is a neutral position and her suitability scores are middling across the board. The speed figure of 54 is the best in the field, which gives her an edge in a race where raw early pace matters, and that appears to be what the model has latched onto.
Best suitability scores in the field, proven from this box — the danger despite the weak structural draw.
Good trap suitability and a decent draw but too inconsistent to trust.
Best structural draw but a consistent placer rather than a winner. Frame only.
Ultra-consistent mid-pack performer with the weakest suitability scores in the field. Against.
Recent D4 winner but looks moderate at D3 level. Place chance at best.
LOW SEPARATION — R1 wins 19.41% vs R3 at 16.29%, just a 3.12pp gap. Very flat trap bias with no dominant position. This is a near-random grade where trap and form barely separate dogs.
T1:17.76% T2:14.34% T3:16.89% T4:18.53% T5:15.95% T6:16.95%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 277m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.