Loading...
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Treanmanagh Rubyb 2y 6 | J G Hurst — 18% R275 W49 P154 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 51 | - | 22 | 21 (6) | 22 (6) | 24 (1) | 18 (5) | 22 (5) | 24 (6) | 32 (5) | - | - | 32 | 41 | 23 | 42 | 55 | 47 | 5 | 11/4 | |
| 2 | ▶ Disengaged 2y 7 | T D Coote — 19% R578 W111 P295 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 46 | - | 30 (3) | 36 (1) | 24 (6) | 23 (5) | 19 (5) | 17 (6) | 24 (5) | 27 (3) | 32 (3) | 33 (2) | 31 | 37 | 11 | 34 | 59 | 47 | 6 | 5/2F | |
| 3 | ▶ Island Magsb 4y 27 | M N May — 16% R276 W45 P110 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 50 | - | 21 (5) | 36 (1) | 23 (4) | 26 (4) | 33 (1) | 23 (5) | 22 (4) | 25 (3) | 23 (5) | 26 (5) | 42 | 61 | 51 | 61 | 65 | 59 | 1 | 7/2 | |
| 4 | ▶ Nolas Jackond 2y 28 | M N May — 16% R276 W45 P110 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 52 | - | 39 (6) | 64 (5) | 25 (1) | 44 (4) | 26 (5) | 37 (4) | 38 (1) | 26 (1) | 30 (4) | - | 42 | 42 | 27 | 42 | 61 | 52 | 4 | 6/1 | |
| 5 | ▶ Russanda Lexib 4y 38 | M N May — 16% R276 W45 P110 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 41 | - | 70 (1) | 50 (4) | 43 (5) | 65 (2) | 31 (3) | 30 (2) | 32 (2) | 25 (1) | 22 (4) | - | 41 | 37 | 49 | 37 | 64 | 53 | 2 | 10/1 | |
| 6 | ▶ Tally Ho Lexib 4y 24 | B Heaton — 15% R196 W30 P96 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 58 | - | 33 (2) | 26 (4) | 30 (3) | 24 (6) | 28 (5) | 38 (1) | 33 (2) | 24 (6) | 31 (3) | 32 (3) | 38 | 34 | 43 | 41 | 59 | 49 | 3 | 11/4 | |
Best average performance in the field (65) with the highest suitability mean by a wide margin (54 — track 61, distance 61, trap 42, class 51). Recent form is strong: 63→78→76 from her last three runs, with two trial wins showing she is in excellent current form. Has run at 268m and 280m recently showing distance flexibility. No pace data available limits assessment of race shape role, but her quality at this CD is undeniable. Trainer May at 14% is modest — the main negative alongside the worst trap in the field (T3 12.3% from 253 runs). But when AP, suitability, and form all point to the same runner, trap statistics become secondary.
DANGER: Second-best AP (64), best class suit (49), two trial wins. The profile of a quality dog. Speed 41 is the main concern at 268m sprint, but if she breaks well she has the quality to compete.
DANGER: Best speed (58) + best trap (20.9%) is the sprint formula. AP 59 is not dominant but at D3 grade, speed from the right trap wins races. If she breaks well from T6, she could lead gate-to-wire.
Minor chance. One D3 win but too inconsistent (43 to 77 range) to trust.
ELIMINATE. Five consecutive declining performances (74→48) is the clearest negative signal in the field. The trajectory says he is not competitive right now.
Minor chance. Has a D3 win but form too variable and AP 61 is below the top two.
T6 dominates at 20.9% from 254 runs. T3 is the weakest at 12.3% — a significant negative for the top-rated runner. Composite R1 wins 18.8% — top dogs have an edge at D3.
T1:17.2%(279) T2:18.2%(358) T3:12.3%(253) T4:15.4%(267) T5:16.5%(236) T6:20.9%(254)
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 268m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.