Loading...
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Choices Bevb 1y 4 | J M Liles — 19% R423 W79 P222 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 50 | - | 22 (3) | 25 (2) | 25 (3) | 21 (4) | 28 (2) | 21 (5) | 25 (4) | 25 (3) | 15 (6) | 30 (1) | 39 | 42 | 11 | 42 | 23 | 29 | 1 | 3/1 | |
| 2 | ▶ Choices Bronteb 1y 7 | J M Liles — 19% R423 W79 P222 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 41 | - | 30 (1) | 18 (5) | 30 (1) | 29 (1) | 16 (5) | 20 (4) | 26 (2) | 17 (6) | 19 (5) | 26 (3) | 24 | 38 | 19 | 38 | 21 | 25 | 6 | 16/1 | |
| 3 | ▶ Makeit Ombudsmand 1y 16 | F J Gray — 20% R350 W70 P186 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 46 | - | 49 (3) | 55 (1) | 43 (3) | 38 (6) | 29 (3) | 15 (1) | - | - | - | - | 43 | 35 | - | 39 | 23 | 29 | 4 | 4/1 | |
| 4 | ▶ Glenvale Berylb 2y 17 | N J Deas — 17% R447 W76 P245 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 50 | - | 22 (2) | 21 (4) | 24 (4) | 29 (1) | 21 (3) | 20 (3) | 22 (4) | 21 (4) | 24 (2) | 26 (2) | 29 | 17 | 14 | 17 | 24 | 23 | 5 | 8/1 | |
| 5 | ▶ Eire Katieb 2y 6 | V A Lea — 15% R191 W29 P78 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 53 | - | 32 (1) | 19 (6) | 31 (1) | 19 (5) | 27 (3) | 24 (4) | 18 (6) | 20 (5) | 24 (2) | 19 (4) | 26 | 35 | 17 | 35 | 23 | 26 | 2 | 9/4 | |
| 6 | ▶ Salacres Emmab 3y 17 | P H Harnden — 18% R396 W71 P224 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 54 | - | 21 (4) | 22 (5) | 20 (5) | 28 (3) | 29 (3) | 32 (1) | 28 (2) | 22 (4) | 24 (2) | 24 (3) | 18 | 28 | 45 | 28 | 25 | 25 | 3 | 15/8F | |
Choices Bev has the best suitability profile in the field with strong course and distance credentials at 42 apiece. Her form has been mixed — a third and a sixth sandwiching a win at this level three starts back — but the average performance is level with the top of the field and her h3 score edges the rest. The trap 1 draw is neutral at just under 18% which isn't a structural advantage, but she knows these conditions well and her recent win at D4 proves she can get the job done. In a race where no dog clearly stands out, her venue knowledge and suitability give her the marginal edge.
Ultra-consistent at this level with good speed — the principal danger.
Weakest form and speed figures in the field — very hard to make a case.
Good draw but lightly raced and stepping up in class on inconsistent form.
Best draw in the race by a wide margin but low suitability and modest form limit her ceiling.
Best speed and solid recent form but the wide draw and poor trap suitability hold her back.
T4 dominates D4 sprints at 27.44% but the runner drawn there (Glenvale Beryl) has poor form. Speed rank 1 wins 26.64% — the fastest dog tends to prevail.
T1:17.78% T2:19.67% T3:22.4% T4:27.44% T5:19.64% T6:17.94%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 270m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.