Loading...
STEVE SIMMONS SPRINT FINAL
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Bretons Boyd 4y 41 | N J Hunt — 19% R372 W72 P205 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 51 | 65 | 91 (1) | 87 (2) | 29 (5) | 35 (3) | 21 (6) | 25 (6) | 80 (2) | 67 (5) | 78 (4) | 39 (2) | 31 | 33 | 30 | 20 | 64 | 48 | 3 | 5/1 | |
| 2 | ▶ Lesleys Buddyd 1y 19 | P W Young — 18% R1322 W243 P772 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 50 | 100 | 100 (1) | 100 (1) | 81 (3) | 87 (2) | 100 (1) | 97 (1) | 54 (5) | 92 (1) | 76 (1) | - | 61 | 82 | 23 | 68 | 67 | 68 | 2 | 5/1 | |
| 3 | ▶ Rockmount Kellieb 2y 37 | C R Morris — 28% R250 W71 P166 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 50 | 0 | 71 (2) | 96 (2) | 94 (2) | 100 (1) | 46 (2) | 78 (1) | 62 (3) | 68 (6) | 92 (3) | - | 53 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 77 | 61 | 1 | 11/8F | |
| 4 | ▶ Bombay Trendd 3y 26 | M E Wiley — 19% R510 W99 P262 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 56 | 50 | 94 (6) | 77 (1) | 62 (1) | 45 (3) | 62 (5) | 74 (2) | 61 (1) | 52 (3) | 37 (5) | - | 39 | 39 | 30 | 27 | 65 | 52 | 6 | 7/1 | |
| 5 | ▶ Jayar Rogued 2y 26 | M L Locke — 23% R292 W66 P171 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 45 | 48 | 76 (4) | 74 (3) | 62 (4) | 77 (2) | 66 (2) | 52 (5) | 64 (4) | 58 (3) | 61 (4) | - | - | 45 | 14 | 63 | 66 | 61 | 5 | 18/1 | |
| 6 | ▶ Mahoonagh Hoffad 3y 45 | P W Young — 18% R1322 W243 P772 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 46 | 53 | 32 (6) | 74 (2) | 56 (5) | 61 (4) | 44 (6) | 91 (1) | 53 (5) | 65 (3) | 81 (2) | 78 (2) | - | 73 | - | 60 | 70 | 68 | 4 | 9/4 | |
Dominant class. AP 77 is 10 clear of the next best (Lesleys Buddy at 67). Trainer at 36% (elite tier) — the highest trainer win rate on the entire Romford card. Performance trajectory 80→81→84→80→78 — five consecutive runs at 78-84, which is A1-level consistency in an OR3 race. That's not just the best in this field — it's the best form of any dog at Romford tonight. Pure Closer (CS 100, EP 0) at 225m is theoretically wrong — closers shouldn't win sprints. One CD run (1st) — she won. But the 36% trainer has placed her here deliberately knowing the distance. When you're running 80-84 perfs against dogs running 65-70, you don't need early pace — you're 15 performance points better. SM data shows SP 50 joint-best.
DANGER: Best EP + inside draw at 225m sprint. He'll lead but AP 64 is 13 below Rockmount Kellie — if she can close in 225m, he's caught.
DANGER: Two CD wins from three starts is an excellent record. His balanced pace works at 225m. But AP 67 is 10 below Rockmount Kellie.
One CD win but declining form. AP 65 is 12 below the leader. Mid-pack finisher.
Pace-maker with the worst AP. Will lead briefly and get caught.
Closer from T6 at 225m without the class to compensate. Structurally beaten.
Only 22 historical runs at Romford 225m OR3 — any statistical patterns are meaningless at this sample size. Race must be analysed on raw form and pace profiles.
Very small sample (22 runs) — trap data unreliable
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 225m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.