GREYHOUNDS MAKE GREAT PETS BITCHES
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ My Lil Bellab 2y 23 | P W Young — 18% R1322 W243 P772 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 50 | 46 | 62 (5) | 55 (4) | 56 (5) | 93 (1) | 77 (2) | 65 (3) | 59 (4) | 68 (4) | 64 (4) | 71 (3) | - | 35 | - | 44 | 55 | 48 | 5 | 5/2 | |
| 2 | ▶ Bacon Burrgerb 2y 7 | P D Burr — 19% R253 W48 P135 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 54 | 57 | 85 (1) | 77 (2) | 55 (5) | 64 (3) | 68 (3) | 88 (3) | 80 (1) | 67 (2) | - | - | 44 | 43 | 26 | 46 | 58 | 52 | 3 | 6/4F | |
| 3 | ▶ Bretons Girlb 3y 5 | N J Hunt — 19% R372 W72 P205 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 62 | 67 | 56 (6) | 54 (5) | 64 (4) | 91 (1) | 62 (4) | 64 (4) | 85 (2) | 53 (5) | 93 (1) | - | 47 | 28 | 40 | 40 | 65 | 54 | 2 | 5/2 | |
| 4 | ▶ Kilara Magicb 3yN/R 2 | R P Rees — 23% R141 W32 P78 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 40 | 37 | 32 (3) | 28 (4) | 31 (5) | 34 (3) | 40 (2) | 35 (3) | 41 (2) | 34 (3) | 44 (6) | 43 (6) | - | 27 | 20 | 37 | 60 | 47 | - | - | |
| 5 | ▶ Yahoo Poppyb 2y 5 | P D Burr — 19% R253 W48 P135 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 51 | 54 | 69 (4) | 84 (1) | 77 (1) | 52 (5) | 51 (6) | 48 (5) | 74 (2) | 82 (2) | 73 (2) | 73 (2) | - | 28 | 23 | 38 | 60 | 48 | 4 | 9/2 | |
| 6 | ▶ Swift Agileb 3y 25 | P D Burr — 19% R253 W48 P135 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 39 | 37 | 86 (4) | 100 (3) | 55 (1) | 48 (4) | 97 (3) | 73 (1) | 81 (5) | 69 (4) | - | - | 39 | 44 | 37 | 44 | 70 | 57 | 1 | 16/1 | |
The headline is the 44% trainer win rate — that's not just strong tier, it's elite-tier by a massive margin. When a trainer places a dog at this level with that strike rate, it signals deliberate intent and confidence. AP60 is mid-pack but the Fader profile at tight Romford is actually advantageous — Faders hold position here because the sharp bends prevent closers from passing. T4 wins 15.0% (mid-range trap) but combined with the trainer edge, this is the most likely winner based on the human intelligence signal. SM21 is poor, suggesting limited CD form, but a 44% trainer may be stepping this dog into a winnable race deliberately.
DANGER: Best speed, second-best AP, good trap. The most complete runner on measurable factors — only beaten here by the trainer signal on Magic.
DANGER: Raw talent is best in field but wrong track, wrong trap, wrong pace profile. A frustrating runner to rate — she'd win at a galloping track but Romford's tight bends cage her closing speed.
Mid-field finisher. Nothing wrong but nothing special — overshadowed by Girl's speed, Agile's AP, and Magic's trainer.
Place contender at best. No standout quality in this field.
ELIMINATE: Best trap wasted on worst AP. No scenario where she overcomes a 15-point talent deficit.
Large sample (728 runs). T1 best at 17.7%, T6 worst at 9.0%. R2 beats R1 (16.7% vs 14.3%) — upsets common. Inside bias evident but moderate.
T1:17.7% T2:12.0% T3:16.4% T4:15.0% T5:15.6% T6:9.0%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 400m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Pace Profile
Avg early pace vs closing speed from last 5 runs
| Dog | Early | Close | Style |
|---|---|---|---|
1My Lil Bella | 43 | 70 | Closer |
2Bacon Burrger | 52 | 47 | All-Rounder |
3Bretons Girl | 66 | 41 | Fader |
4Kilara Magic | 69 | 0 | Fader |
5Yahoo Poppy | 48 | 53 | All-Rounder |
6Swift Agile | 0 | 100 | Closer |
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.