Loading...
Watch PGR On greyhounds.attheraces.com Stakes
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Swift Doireannb 3y 10 | M T Munslow — 23% R148 W34 P93 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 48 | 43 | 71 (1) | 77 (1) | 70 (1) | 61 (2) | 61 (2) | 46 (5) | 48 (4) | 71 (1) | 46 (4) | 68 (1) | 41 | 41 | 35 | 40 | 54 | 45 | 4 | 8/1 | |
| 2 | ▶ Aegean Songb 1y 8 | K Wilton — 23% R173 W40 P91 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 49 | 55 | 86 (1) | 73 (2) | 80 (1) | 65 (1) | 55 (6) | - | - | - | - | - | 37 | 65 | 18 | 48 | 60 | 54 | 1 | 6/5F | |
| 3 | ▶ Hollyhill Bulletd 1y 5 | F Macklin — 20% R205 W42 P105 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 49 | 50 | 83 (2) | 90 (1) | 80 (1) | 53 (3) | 62 (2) | 74 (1) | 45 (5) | 70 (1) | 59 (2) | - | 33 | 45 | - | 37 | 57 | 45 | 3 | 7/4 | |
| 4 | ▶ Wolf Flareb 3y 3 | J Llewellin — 17% R365 W61 P195 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 48 | 46 | 52 (3) | 72 (1) | 56 (3) | 61 (2) | 54 (4) | 55 (4) | 58 (3) | 50 (6) | 21 (1) | 74 (1) | 32 | 33 | 30 | 34 | 53 | 40 | 5 | 7/1 | |
| 5 | ▶ Saul Goodmand 2y 17 | S W Deakin — 17% R519 W87 P242 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 53 | 51 | 39 (5) | 31 (6) | 50 (5) | 28 (6) | 39 (6) | 46 (6) | 51 (6) | 55 (5) | 57 (3) | - | 26 | 32 | 11 | 14 | 49 | 33 | 6 | 12/1 | |
| 6 | ▶ Toddys Thunderb 4y 25 | S W Deakin — 17% R519 W87 P242 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 60 | 53 | 35 (6) | 48 (5) | 70 (1) | 41 (6) | 54 (5) | 63 (6) | 51 (4) | 58 (4) | 65 (2) | 53 (4) | 31 | 25 | - | 17 | 58 | 36 | 2 | 6/1 | |
The classiest dog in the field on average performance, and her track suitability of 65 is comfortably the highest — she clearly handles Nottingham well. Her two most recent runs produced figures of 65 and 55, suggesting she's in decent form after a difficult spell earlier in the year. She leads her races early and tends to weaken in the closing stages, but at this level her quality advantage may be enough to hold on. The trap 2 draw is fair at these conditions and her strong bend rating should see her well placed through that crucial first turn.
Best speed and most consistent form in the field but faces a dead draw — the one to beat if the pace collapses.
Strong draw and proven course form but inconsistent recent performances and reliant on a pace collapse to win.
Talented on her day but wildly inconsistent — impossible to back with any confidence.
Capable of a big run on his day but recent form is too patchy to warrant serious consideration.
Best draw in the race but bottom on ability — the data says this dog can't capitalise on the structural advantage.
LOW SEPARATION — composite rank 1 wins just 19.8% vs rank 3 at 18.3%. Speed rank is the better predictor at 23.8% for rank 1. Trap 6 is significantly disadvantaged.
T1:21.5% T2:20.6% T3:19.0% T4:19.2% T5:22.0% T6:13.5%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 500m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Pace Profile
Avg early pace vs closing speed from last 5 runs
| Dog | Early | Close | Style |
|---|---|---|---|
1Swift Doireann | 44 | 56 | Closer |
2Aegean Song | 58 | 19 | Fader |
3Hollyhill Bullet | 53 | 40 | All-Rounder |
4Wolf Flare | 47 | 63 | Closer |
5Saul Goodman | 53 | 44 | All-Rounder |
6Toddys Thunder | 0 | 100 | Closer |
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.