ROMFORD GREYHOUND OWNERS ASSOCIATION
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | Bet | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | ||||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Aminutetootend 2y 4 | D K Hurlock — 19% R927 W178 P513 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 45 | 48 | 49 (5) | 77 (1) | 47 (5) | 39 (6) | 51 (4) | 59 (3) | 58 (2) | 48 (6) | 70 (2) | 78 (1) | 39 | 47 | 34 | 32 | 56 | 44 | 3 | 8/1 | - | |
| 2 | ▶ Churchfield Kingd 1y | D Mullins — 18% R363 W67 P230 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | 38 | 5 | 11/4 | - | |
| 3 | ▶ Thorney Viewd 1y 23 | P W Young — 18% R1312 W233 P739 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 51 | 47 | 56 (5) | 69 (2) | 39 (5) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 16 | 24 | - | 14 | 56 | 36 | 2 | 6/4F | - | |
| 4 | ▶ Bubbly Monzad 3y 36 | P W Young — 18% R1312 W233 P739 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 51 | 54 | 50 (4) | 52 (5) | 79 (1) | 64 (3) | 70 (2) | 61 (4) | 70 (3) | 63 (3) | 54 (5) | 79 (1) | 21 | 30 | 21 | 23 | 62 | 36 | 4 | 10/3 | - | |
| 5 | ▶ Carrick Riod 1y 12 | T S Welch — 16% R110 W18 P51 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 53 | 53 | 63 (2) | 67 (3) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 19 | 15 | 6 | 16 | 65 | 41 | 1 | 10/3 | - | |
The required model selection, and the statistical case is built on a two-run career that has produced consistently promising output — P63 and P67, both at A4 here, both producing performances that put him firmly in contention at this level from the start. An average performance of 65 from just two runs is the highest in today's five-runner field, suggesting he is a talented young dog who may have more development ahead. He came second last time out, pushing the winner close, and the consistency of his two runs (only four points apart) is unusual for such an inexperienced runner. The uncertainty is that two runs is a very small sample — we cannot know how he will handle a full competitive season — but on merit, the raw performance numbers suggest he belongs at A4 and may yet improve further.
Composite R1 with best course record — the analytical pick and primary danger to the required selection.
No form — cannot be assessed or recommended. The draw advantage is irrelevant without performance evidence.
Showed A3-level quality (P69) two runs back but fifth last time — inconsistent enough to be a place candidate only.
Best structural draw in the race — in a five-runner field, the trap 4 advantage at A4 is particularly significant and she has the form to exploit it.
Trap 4 strongest at A4 (24.6%). Composite R1 wins 21.7% with a big drop to R3 (13.8%), making it a two-runner race analytically. Five-runner field reduces interference risk and increases single-runner dominance.
T1:17.5% T2:16.7% T3:18.8% T4:24.6% T5:17.7% T6:16.3%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 400m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Pace Profile
Avg early pace vs closing speed from last 5 runs
| Dog | Early | Close | Style |
|---|---|---|---|
1Aminutetooten | 49 | 43 | All-Rounder |
2Churchfield King | — | — | No data |
3Thorney View | 48 | 48 | All-Rounder |
4Bubbly Monza | 51 | 52 | All-Rounder |
5Carrick Rio | 52 | 53 | All-Rounder |
Only runs at exactly 400m — no cross-distance comparisons. Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.